Comparing sprinkler and surface irrigation for wheat using multi-criteria analysis: water saving vs. economic returns

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Darouich, Hanaa
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Cameira, M.R., Gonçalves, José M., Paredes, Paula, Pereira, L.S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/13720
Resumo: Coping with water scarcity using supplemental irrigation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the semi-arid northeast Syria is a great challenge for sustainable water use in agriculture. Graded borders and set sprinkler systems were compared using multi-criteria analysis. Alternative solutions for surface irrigation and for sprinkler systems were developed with the SADREG and the PROASPER design models, respectively. For each alternative, two deficit irrigation strategies were considered, which were characterized using indicators relative to irrigation water use, yields and water productivity, including farm economic returns. Alternatives were ranked considering two contrasting priorities: economic returns and water saving. A first step in ranking led to a selection of graded borders with and without precise land levelling and of solid set and semi-permanent sprinkler systems. Precise-levelled borders were better for water saving, while non-precise ones ranked higher for economic returns. Semi-permanent set systems have been shown to be better in economic terms and similar to solid set systems when water saving is prioritized. Semi-permanent sprinkler systems rank first when comparing all type of systems together regardless of the considered deficit irrigation strategy. Likely, border irrigation is appropriate when wheat is in rotation with cotton if the latter is surface irrigated. When peace becomes effective, appropriate economic incentives and training for farmers are required to implement innovative approaches
id RCAP_b59d2427ca86e1b1cd969c99385f879b
oai_identifier_str oai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/13720
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Comparing sprinkler and surface irrigation for wheat using multi-criteria analysis: water saving vs. economic returnsborder irrigationset sprinkler irrigationnortheast Syriawater productivitydeficit irrigationCoping with water scarcity using supplemental irrigation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the semi-arid northeast Syria is a great challenge for sustainable water use in agriculture. Graded borders and set sprinkler systems were compared using multi-criteria analysis. Alternative solutions for surface irrigation and for sprinkler systems were developed with the SADREG and the PROASPER design models, respectively. For each alternative, two deficit irrigation strategies were considered, which were characterized using indicators relative to irrigation water use, yields and water productivity, including farm economic returns. Alternatives were ranked considering two contrasting priorities: economic returns and water saving. A first step in ranking led to a selection of graded borders with and without precise land levelling and of solid set and semi-permanent sprinkler systems. Precise-levelled borders were better for water saving, while non-precise ones ranked higher for economic returns. Semi-permanent set systems have been shown to be better in economic terms and similar to solid set systems when water saving is prioritized. Semi-permanent sprinkler systems rank first when comparing all type of systems together regardless of the considered deficit irrigation strategy. Likely, border irrigation is appropriate when wheat is in rotation with cotton if the latter is surface irrigated. When peace becomes effective, appropriate economic incentives and training for farmers are required to implement innovative approachesMDPIRepositório da Universidade de LisboaDarouich, HanaaCameira, M.R.Gonçalves, José M.Paredes, PaulaPereira, L.S.2017-06-06T12:50:41Z20172017-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/13720eng"Water". ISSN 2073-4441. 9 (2017), p.502073-444110.3390/w9010050info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-06T14:43:48Zoai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/13720Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:59:39.892990Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparing sprinkler and surface irrigation for wheat using multi-criteria analysis: water saving vs. economic returns
title Comparing sprinkler and surface irrigation for wheat using multi-criteria analysis: water saving vs. economic returns
spellingShingle Comparing sprinkler and surface irrigation for wheat using multi-criteria analysis: water saving vs. economic returns
Darouich, Hanaa
border irrigation
set sprinkler irrigation
northeast Syria
water productivity
deficit irrigation
title_short Comparing sprinkler and surface irrigation for wheat using multi-criteria analysis: water saving vs. economic returns
title_full Comparing sprinkler and surface irrigation for wheat using multi-criteria analysis: water saving vs. economic returns
title_fullStr Comparing sprinkler and surface irrigation for wheat using multi-criteria analysis: water saving vs. economic returns
title_full_unstemmed Comparing sprinkler and surface irrigation for wheat using multi-criteria analysis: water saving vs. economic returns
title_sort Comparing sprinkler and surface irrigation for wheat using multi-criteria analysis: water saving vs. economic returns
author Darouich, Hanaa
author_facet Darouich, Hanaa
Cameira, M.R.
Gonçalves, José M.
Paredes, Paula
Pereira, L.S.
author_role author
author2 Cameira, M.R.
Gonçalves, José M.
Paredes, Paula
Pereira, L.S.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Darouich, Hanaa
Cameira, M.R.
Gonçalves, José M.
Paredes, Paula
Pereira, L.S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv border irrigation
set sprinkler irrigation
northeast Syria
water productivity
deficit irrigation
topic border irrigation
set sprinkler irrigation
northeast Syria
water productivity
deficit irrigation
description Coping with water scarcity using supplemental irrigation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the semi-arid northeast Syria is a great challenge for sustainable water use in agriculture. Graded borders and set sprinkler systems were compared using multi-criteria analysis. Alternative solutions for surface irrigation and for sprinkler systems were developed with the SADREG and the PROASPER design models, respectively. For each alternative, two deficit irrigation strategies were considered, which were characterized using indicators relative to irrigation water use, yields and water productivity, including farm economic returns. Alternatives were ranked considering two contrasting priorities: economic returns and water saving. A first step in ranking led to a selection of graded borders with and without precise land levelling and of solid set and semi-permanent sprinkler systems. Precise-levelled borders were better for water saving, while non-precise ones ranked higher for economic returns. Semi-permanent set systems have been shown to be better in economic terms and similar to solid set systems when water saving is prioritized. Semi-permanent sprinkler systems rank first when comparing all type of systems together regardless of the considered deficit irrigation strategy. Likely, border irrigation is appropriate when wheat is in rotation with cotton if the latter is surface irrigated. When peace becomes effective, appropriate economic incentives and training for farmers are required to implement innovative approaches
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06-06T12:50:41Z
2017
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/13720
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/13720
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv "Water". ISSN 2073-4441. 9 (2017), p.50
2073-4441
10.3390/w9010050
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131083689689088