Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1098 |
Resumo: | In this paper, we approach the relationship between believing that affect informs about the validity of a claim and believing that one persuasive strategy will be more or less efficient in changing one’s own attitude. In one study, participants were asked to select from a set of features of a persuasive context those they perceived to have more persuasive power. Results showed that these selections were clearly clustered in two groups, suggesting that individuals tend to select either more cognitive features or more experiential affective features. Individual measures regarding participants’ need for cognition and faith in intuition did not explain the tendency to select more one type of cluster or another, but this selection was determined by how much people generally believe that affect informs about the validity or goodness of a claim. |
id |
RCAP_bcd83a3a3a8db2a37e3be54646f7bd44 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.localhost:article/1098 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacyAffect as information, Persuasion, Rational-experiential personalities.In this paper, we approach the relationship between believing that affect informs about the validity of a claim and believing that one persuasive strategy will be more or less efficient in changing one’s own attitude. In one study, participants were asked to select from a set of features of a persuasive context those they perceived to have more persuasive power. Results showed that these selections were clearly clustered in two groups, suggesting that individuals tend to select either more cognitive features or more experiential affective features. Individual measures regarding participants’ need for cognition and faith in intuition did not explain the tendency to select more one type of cluster or another, but this selection was determined by how much people generally believe that affect informs about the validity or goodness of a claim.ISPA - Instituto Universitário2016-03-02info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1098https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1098Análise Psicológica; Vol 34, No 1 (2016); 73-86Análise Psicológica; Vol 34, No 1 (2016); 73-861646-60200870-8231reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttp://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/view/1098http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/view/1098/pdfhttp://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/downloadSuppFile/1098/102http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/downloadSuppFile/1098/103Garcia-Marques, TeresaLoureiro, Filipeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-05-11T10:20:12Zoai:ojs.localhost:article/1098Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:51:18.953214Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy |
title |
Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy |
spellingShingle |
Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy Garcia-Marques, Teresa Affect as information, Persuasion, Rational-experiential personalities. |
title_short |
Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy |
title_full |
Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy |
title_fullStr |
Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy |
title_sort |
Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy |
author |
Garcia-Marques, Teresa |
author_facet |
Garcia-Marques, Teresa Loureiro, Filipe |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Loureiro, Filipe |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Garcia-Marques, Teresa Loureiro, Filipe |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Affect as information, Persuasion, Rational-experiential personalities. |
topic |
Affect as information, Persuasion, Rational-experiential personalities. |
description |
In this paper, we approach the relationship between believing that affect informs about the validity of a claim and believing that one persuasive strategy will be more or less efficient in changing one’s own attitude. In one study, participants were asked to select from a set of features of a persuasive context those they perceived to have more persuasive power. Results showed that these selections were clearly clustered in two groups, suggesting that individuals tend to select either more cognitive features or more experiential affective features. Individual measures regarding participants’ need for cognition and faith in intuition did not explain the tendency to select more one type of cluster or another, but this selection was determined by how much people generally believe that affect informs about the validity or goodness of a claim. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-03-02 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1098 https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1098 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1098 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/view/1098 http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/view/1098/pdf http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/downloadSuppFile/1098/102 http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/downloadSuppFile/1098/103 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ISPA - Instituto Universitário |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ISPA - Instituto Universitário |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Análise Psicológica; Vol 34, No 1 (2016); 73-86 Análise Psicológica; Vol 34, No 1 (2016); 73-86 1646-6020 0870-8231 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131591158530048 |