Counting invasive breast cancer cells in the HER2 silver in-situ hybridization test: how many cells are enough?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.10/1991 |
Resumo: | AIM: To evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of the HER2 in-situ hybridization (ISH) test in breast cancer by measuring the impact of counting different numbers of invasive cancer cells. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cohort of 101 primary invasive breast cancer cases were evaluated for HER2 gene amplification by silver ISH, and the concordance among four observers with different levels of experience, counting different numbers of invasive cancer cells, was determined. The evaluation of the samples included scoring 20 nuclei, in three different areas. The cases were scored twice, with a washout interval of at least 2 weeks. We observed an increase in the intraobserver concordance rate between the first and second evaluations with an increase in cell count. A count of 60 invasive cells was needed to obtain a concordance rate near 95% and an agreement rate greater than 0.80 by all observers. The interobserver concordance rate of the HER2 test also increased with the increase in cell count, reaching at least a 90% concordance rate with a count of 60 invasive cells. The median variability of both the HER2/CEP17 ratio and the average HER2 copy number between different evaluations decreased with the increase in cell count, being statistically higher in HER2-positive cases. CONCLUSIONS: The minimal cell number recommended in current guidelines should be raised to at least 40, and preferably 60, invasive cells. Moreover, cases with amplification levels close to the threshold should be subjected to a dual count from an experienced observer. |
id |
RCAP_d030d696f87a519905cf6f3cb1722b2e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.hff.min-saude.pt:10400.10/1991 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Counting invasive breast cancer cells in the HER2 silver in-situ hybridization test: how many cells are enough?Breast neoplasmsIn situ hybridizationerbB-2 genesAIM: To evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of the HER2 in-situ hybridization (ISH) test in breast cancer by measuring the impact of counting different numbers of invasive cancer cells. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cohort of 101 primary invasive breast cancer cases were evaluated for HER2 gene amplification by silver ISH, and the concordance among four observers with different levels of experience, counting different numbers of invasive cancer cells, was determined. The evaluation of the samples included scoring 20 nuclei, in three different areas. The cases were scored twice, with a washout interval of at least 2 weeks. We observed an increase in the intraobserver concordance rate between the first and second evaluations with an increase in cell count. A count of 60 invasive cells was needed to obtain a concordance rate near 95% and an agreement rate greater than 0.80 by all observers. The interobserver concordance rate of the HER2 test also increased with the increase in cell count, reaching at least a 90% concordance rate with a count of 60 invasive cells. The median variability of both the HER2/CEP17 ratio and the average HER2 copy number between different evaluations decreased with the increase in cell count, being statistically higher in HER2-positive cases. CONCLUSIONS: The minimal cell number recommended in current guidelines should be raised to at least 40, and preferably 60, invasive cells. Moreover, cases with amplification levels close to the threshold should be subjected to a dual count from an experienced observer.Blackwell Scientific PublicationsRepositório do Hospital Prof. Doutor Fernando FonsecaPolónia, AEloy, CPinto, JBraga, AOliveira, GSchmitt, F2018-04-13T11:25:13Z2017-01-01T00:00:00Z2017-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.10/1991engHistopathology. 2017 Aug;71(2):247-257.1365-255910.1111/his.13208metadata only accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-20T15:52:42Zoai:repositorio.hff.min-saude.pt:10400.10/1991Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:53:00.359433Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Counting invasive breast cancer cells in the HER2 silver in-situ hybridization test: how many cells are enough? |
title |
Counting invasive breast cancer cells in the HER2 silver in-situ hybridization test: how many cells are enough? |
spellingShingle |
Counting invasive breast cancer cells in the HER2 silver in-situ hybridization test: how many cells are enough? Polónia, A Breast neoplasms In situ hybridization erbB-2 genes |
title_short |
Counting invasive breast cancer cells in the HER2 silver in-situ hybridization test: how many cells are enough? |
title_full |
Counting invasive breast cancer cells in the HER2 silver in-situ hybridization test: how many cells are enough? |
title_fullStr |
Counting invasive breast cancer cells in the HER2 silver in-situ hybridization test: how many cells are enough? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Counting invasive breast cancer cells in the HER2 silver in-situ hybridization test: how many cells are enough? |
title_sort |
Counting invasive breast cancer cells in the HER2 silver in-situ hybridization test: how many cells are enough? |
author |
Polónia, A |
author_facet |
Polónia, A Eloy, C Pinto, J Braga, A Oliveira, G Schmitt, F |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Eloy, C Pinto, J Braga, A Oliveira, G Schmitt, F |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório do Hospital Prof. Doutor Fernando Fonseca |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Polónia, A Eloy, C Pinto, J Braga, A Oliveira, G Schmitt, F |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Breast neoplasms In situ hybridization erbB-2 genes |
topic |
Breast neoplasms In situ hybridization erbB-2 genes |
description |
AIM: To evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of the HER2 in-situ hybridization (ISH) test in breast cancer by measuring the impact of counting different numbers of invasive cancer cells. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cohort of 101 primary invasive breast cancer cases were evaluated for HER2 gene amplification by silver ISH, and the concordance among four observers with different levels of experience, counting different numbers of invasive cancer cells, was determined. The evaluation of the samples included scoring 20 nuclei, in three different areas. The cases were scored twice, with a washout interval of at least 2 weeks. We observed an increase in the intraobserver concordance rate between the first and second evaluations with an increase in cell count. A count of 60 invasive cells was needed to obtain a concordance rate near 95% and an agreement rate greater than 0.80 by all observers. The interobserver concordance rate of the HER2 test also increased with the increase in cell count, reaching at least a 90% concordance rate with a count of 60 invasive cells. The median variability of both the HER2/CEP17 ratio and the average HER2 copy number between different evaluations decreased with the increase in cell count, being statistically higher in HER2-positive cases. CONCLUSIONS: The minimal cell number recommended in current guidelines should be raised to at least 40, and preferably 60, invasive cells. Moreover, cases with amplification levels close to the threshold should be subjected to a dual count from an experienced observer. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z 2018-04-13T11:25:13Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.10/1991 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.10/1991 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Histopathology. 2017 Aug;71(2):247-257. 1365-2559 10.1111/his.13208 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
metadata only access info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
metadata only access |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Blackwell Scientific Publications |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Blackwell Scientific Publications |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130396720365568 |