Public management: what methodological options for analysis of public investment projects in Portugal?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Teixeira, C.
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Pereira, L.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/10833
Resumo: This paper intends to provide a deeper understanding about the current public best practices applied in organizations/countries worldwide. Although the international advanced practices on cost benefit analysis of public investment projects, in Portugal, the last twenty years it was found serious failures in the process of appraisal and evaluation of public investment projects, which led to high financial deviations with strong consequences for current and future taxpayers. For this reason, this paper seeks to identify the best international practices for Portuguese public sector, in order to provide managers, auditors and policy makers, tools and technics for successful investment projects in the near future. This paper presents the main results from a research about the current evaluation projects best practices used by high developed countries, where it was possible to conclude that (1) risk management and (2) examines/review projects at key decisions points are critical in the process of projects appraisals. For example, a peer examine provides the project team with an independent view of the current progress of the project and assurance that it can proceed successfully to the next stage.
id RCAP_d43f50f3d3b1961d84aca75e45e4c9e8
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/10833
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Public management: what methodological options for analysis of public investment projects in Portugal?Best practicesEvaluating projectsGateway review processPublic managementThis paper intends to provide a deeper understanding about the current public best practices applied in organizations/countries worldwide. Although the international advanced practices on cost benefit analysis of public investment projects, in Portugal, the last twenty years it was found serious failures in the process of appraisal and evaluation of public investment projects, which led to high financial deviations with strong consequences for current and future taxpayers. For this reason, this paper seeks to identify the best international practices for Portuguese public sector, in order to provide managers, auditors and policy makers, tools and technics for successful investment projects in the near future. This paper presents the main results from a research about the current evaluation projects best practices used by high developed countries, where it was possible to conclude that (1) risk management and (2) examines/review projects at key decisions points are critical in the process of projects appraisals. For example, a peer examine provides the project team with an independent view of the current progress of the project and assurance that it can proceed successfully to the next stage.International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications2016-02-02T14:35:58Z2015-01-01T00:00:00Z20152019-05-15T17:07:20Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/10833eng2250-3153Teixeira, C.Pereira, L.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:35:44Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/10833Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:16:10.858590Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Public management: what methodological options for analysis of public investment projects in Portugal?
title Public management: what methodological options for analysis of public investment projects in Portugal?
spellingShingle Public management: what methodological options for analysis of public investment projects in Portugal?
Teixeira, C.
Best practices
Evaluating projects
Gateway review process
Public management
title_short Public management: what methodological options for analysis of public investment projects in Portugal?
title_full Public management: what methodological options for analysis of public investment projects in Portugal?
title_fullStr Public management: what methodological options for analysis of public investment projects in Portugal?
title_full_unstemmed Public management: what methodological options for analysis of public investment projects in Portugal?
title_sort Public management: what methodological options for analysis of public investment projects in Portugal?
author Teixeira, C.
author_facet Teixeira, C.
Pereira, L.
author_role author
author2 Pereira, L.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Teixeira, C.
Pereira, L.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Best practices
Evaluating projects
Gateway review process
Public management
topic Best practices
Evaluating projects
Gateway review process
Public management
description This paper intends to provide a deeper understanding about the current public best practices applied in organizations/countries worldwide. Although the international advanced practices on cost benefit analysis of public investment projects, in Portugal, the last twenty years it was found serious failures in the process of appraisal and evaluation of public investment projects, which led to high financial deviations with strong consequences for current and future taxpayers. For this reason, this paper seeks to identify the best international practices for Portuguese public sector, in order to provide managers, auditors and policy makers, tools and technics for successful investment projects in the near future. This paper presents the main results from a research about the current evaluation projects best practices used by high developed countries, where it was possible to conclude that (1) risk management and (2) examines/review projects at key decisions points are critical in the process of projects appraisals. For example, a peer examine provides the project team with an independent view of the current progress of the project and assurance that it can proceed successfully to the next stage.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
2015
2016-02-02T14:35:58Z
2019-05-15T17:07:20Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/10833
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/10833
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2250-3153
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications
publisher.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134719993970688