Public management: what methodological options for analysis of public investment projects in Portugal?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/10833 |
Resumo: | This paper intends to provide a deeper understanding about the current public best practices applied in organizations/countries worldwide. Although the international advanced practices on cost benefit analysis of public investment projects, in Portugal, the last twenty years it was found serious failures in the process of appraisal and evaluation of public investment projects, which led to high financial deviations with strong consequences for current and future taxpayers. For this reason, this paper seeks to identify the best international practices for Portuguese public sector, in order to provide managers, auditors and policy makers, tools and technics for successful investment projects in the near future. This paper presents the main results from a research about the current evaluation projects best practices used by high developed countries, where it was possible to conclude that (1) risk management and (2) examines/review projects at key decisions points are critical in the process of projects appraisals. For example, a peer examine provides the project team with an independent view of the current progress of the project and assurance that it can proceed successfully to the next stage. |
id |
RCAP_d43f50f3d3b1961d84aca75e45e4c9e8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/10833 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Public management: what methodological options for analysis of public investment projects in Portugal?Best practicesEvaluating projectsGateway review processPublic managementThis paper intends to provide a deeper understanding about the current public best practices applied in organizations/countries worldwide. Although the international advanced practices on cost benefit analysis of public investment projects, in Portugal, the last twenty years it was found serious failures in the process of appraisal and evaluation of public investment projects, which led to high financial deviations with strong consequences for current and future taxpayers. For this reason, this paper seeks to identify the best international practices for Portuguese public sector, in order to provide managers, auditors and policy makers, tools and technics for successful investment projects in the near future. This paper presents the main results from a research about the current evaluation projects best practices used by high developed countries, where it was possible to conclude that (1) risk management and (2) examines/review projects at key decisions points are critical in the process of projects appraisals. For example, a peer examine provides the project team with an independent view of the current progress of the project and assurance that it can proceed successfully to the next stage.International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications2016-02-02T14:35:58Z2015-01-01T00:00:00Z20152019-05-15T17:07:20Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/10833eng2250-3153Teixeira, C.Pereira, L.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:35:44Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/10833Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:16:10.858590Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Public management: what methodological options for analysis of public investment projects in Portugal? |
title |
Public management: what methodological options for analysis of public investment projects in Portugal? |
spellingShingle |
Public management: what methodological options for analysis of public investment projects in Portugal? Teixeira, C. Best practices Evaluating projects Gateway review process Public management |
title_short |
Public management: what methodological options for analysis of public investment projects in Portugal? |
title_full |
Public management: what methodological options for analysis of public investment projects in Portugal? |
title_fullStr |
Public management: what methodological options for analysis of public investment projects in Portugal? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Public management: what methodological options for analysis of public investment projects in Portugal? |
title_sort |
Public management: what methodological options for analysis of public investment projects in Portugal? |
author |
Teixeira, C. |
author_facet |
Teixeira, C. Pereira, L. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira, L. |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Teixeira, C. Pereira, L. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Best practices Evaluating projects Gateway review process Public management |
topic |
Best practices Evaluating projects Gateway review process Public management |
description |
This paper intends to provide a deeper understanding about the current public best practices applied in organizations/countries worldwide. Although the international advanced practices on cost benefit analysis of public investment projects, in Portugal, the last twenty years it was found serious failures in the process of appraisal and evaluation of public investment projects, which led to high financial deviations with strong consequences for current and future taxpayers. For this reason, this paper seeks to identify the best international practices for Portuguese public sector, in order to provide managers, auditors and policy makers, tools and technics for successful investment projects in the near future. This paper presents the main results from a research about the current evaluation projects best practices used by high developed countries, where it was possible to conclude that (1) risk management and (2) examines/review projects at key decisions points are critical in the process of projects appraisals. For example, a peer examine provides the project team with an independent view of the current progress of the project and assurance that it can proceed successfully to the next stage. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z 2015 2016-02-02T14:35:58Z 2019-05-15T17:07:20Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/10833 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/10833 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2250-3153 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134719993970688 |