Instrumentation used to assess pain in osteopathic interventions: A critical literature review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/21155 |
Resumo: | A variety of different scales have been used to measure the intensity of pain in osteopathic-specific clinical studies; however, the criteria for the options are not always clear or reported. To compare the different questionnaires used by researchers for assessing the intensity of pain in clinical trials in osteopathy and analyse the reasons for their choice. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using 7 electronic databases (SCOPUS, Cochrane Central, MEDLINE, PEDro, OSTMED.DR, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science) for Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) articles, studying the efficacy/effectiveness of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) in reducing pain intensity. Only articles in English from 2012 to 2019 were selected. We used the Jadad score to assess the risk of bias. 130 studies were initially identified with a total of 26 included in this review. Sixteen studies used the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), four the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the remaining used other options. Researchers did not always provide an appropriate justification for their chosen evaluation instrument. The overall quality of the studies was considered moderate. Researchers in the field of osteopathy and other health care professions should provide a clear rationale for their chosen tools for measuring the intensity of pain, and these should align with the study design and objectives. |
id |
RCAP_d44379ac3483c10be9b949cbfd16741e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/21155 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Instrumentation used to assess pain in osteopathic interventions: A critical literature reviewAssessment of painEffects of OMTIntensity of painPain scalesA variety of different scales have been used to measure the intensity of pain in osteopathic-specific clinical studies; however, the criteria for the options are not always clear or reported. To compare the different questionnaires used by researchers for assessing the intensity of pain in clinical trials in osteopathy and analyse the reasons for their choice. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using 7 electronic databases (SCOPUS, Cochrane Central, MEDLINE, PEDro, OSTMED.DR, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science) for Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) articles, studying the efficacy/effectiveness of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) in reducing pain intensity. Only articles in English from 2012 to 2019 were selected. We used the Jadad score to assess the risk of bias. 130 studies were initially identified with a total of 26 included in this review. Sixteen studies used the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), four the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the remaining used other options. Researchers did not always provide an appropriate justification for their chosen evaluation instrument. The overall quality of the studies was considered moderate. Researchers in the field of osteopathy and other health care professions should provide a clear rationale for their chosen tools for measuring the intensity of pain, and these should align with the study design and objectives.ElsevierRepositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do PortoSantiago, Rui JoséEsteves, JorgeBaptista, João SantosMarques, António TorresCosta, José Torres2022-12-06T12:49:41Z2020-092020-09-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdftext/plainhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/21155engSantiago, R. J., Esteves, J., Baptista, J. S., Marques, A. T., & Costa, J. T. (2020). Instrumentation used to assess pain in osteopathic interventions: A critical literature review. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 37, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijosm.2020.05.0071746-068910.1016/j.ijosm.2020.05.0071878-0164metadata only accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-13T13:16:59Zoai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/21155Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:41:14.246460Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Instrumentation used to assess pain in osteopathic interventions: A critical literature review |
title |
Instrumentation used to assess pain in osteopathic interventions: A critical literature review |
spellingShingle |
Instrumentation used to assess pain in osteopathic interventions: A critical literature review Santiago, Rui José Assessment of pain Effects of OMT Intensity of pain Pain scales |
title_short |
Instrumentation used to assess pain in osteopathic interventions: A critical literature review |
title_full |
Instrumentation used to assess pain in osteopathic interventions: A critical literature review |
title_fullStr |
Instrumentation used to assess pain in osteopathic interventions: A critical literature review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Instrumentation used to assess pain in osteopathic interventions: A critical literature review |
title_sort |
Instrumentation used to assess pain in osteopathic interventions: A critical literature review |
author |
Santiago, Rui José |
author_facet |
Santiago, Rui José Esteves, Jorge Baptista, João Santos Marques, António Torres Costa, José Torres |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Esteves, Jorge Baptista, João Santos Marques, António Torres Costa, José Torres |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do Porto |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santiago, Rui José Esteves, Jorge Baptista, João Santos Marques, António Torres Costa, José Torres |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Assessment of pain Effects of OMT Intensity of pain Pain scales |
topic |
Assessment of pain Effects of OMT Intensity of pain Pain scales |
description |
A variety of different scales have been used to measure the intensity of pain in osteopathic-specific clinical studies; however, the criteria for the options are not always clear or reported. To compare the different questionnaires used by researchers for assessing the intensity of pain in clinical trials in osteopathy and analyse the reasons for their choice. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using 7 electronic databases (SCOPUS, Cochrane Central, MEDLINE, PEDro, OSTMED.DR, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science) for Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) articles, studying the efficacy/effectiveness of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) in reducing pain intensity. Only articles in English from 2012 to 2019 were selected. We used the Jadad score to assess the risk of bias. 130 studies were initially identified with a total of 26 included in this review. Sixteen studies used the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), four the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the remaining used other options. Researchers did not always provide an appropriate justification for their chosen evaluation instrument. The overall quality of the studies was considered moderate. Researchers in the field of osteopathy and other health care professions should provide a clear rationale for their chosen tools for measuring the intensity of pain, and these should align with the study design and objectives. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09 2020-09-01T00:00:00Z 2022-12-06T12:49:41Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/21155 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/21155 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Santiago, R. J., Esteves, J., Baptista, J. S., Marques, A. T., & Costa, J. T. (2020). Instrumentation used to assess pain in osteopathic interventions: A critical literature review. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 37, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijosm.2020.05.007 1746-0689 10.1016/j.ijosm.2020.05.007 1878-0164 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
metadata only access info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
metadata only access |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/plain |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131500375965696 |