Religion and citizenship: the difference assured in pluralism and democracy as an antidote to new fundamentalisms
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/36987 |
Resumo: | If the paradigm of secularization as replacement was falsified by the permanent vitality of the religious dimension on the world horizon and in the public sphere, the universalization of the paradigm of secularization as differentiation, on the contrary, turns out to be an essential guarantee of the maintenance and promotion of the rule of law and human rights. From an alternative perspective to both secularism and fundamentalism, public theology today is therefore called upon to reconstruct and argumentatively justify the function of religious freedom as a basic principle of democratic society, within the framework of cognitive and normative disjunction between religion and citizenship which rules modernity. It is urgent to theologically demystify the regressive manipulation of this principle, as a vector of a democratically disruptive tribal pluralism, in contradiction with its nature as a catalyst for an integrative pluralism essential for social cohesion and the common good. |
id |
RCAP_f81760164adec000e59bd887fdbd8dba |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/36987 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Religion and citizenship: the difference assured in pluralism and democracy as an antidote to new fundamentalismsReligious libertyLaïcitéSecularizationJ.C. MurrayCitizenshipReligious fundamentalismIf the paradigm of secularization as replacement was falsified by the permanent vitality of the religious dimension on the world horizon and in the public sphere, the universalization of the paradigm of secularization as differentiation, on the contrary, turns out to be an essential guarantee of the maintenance and promotion of the rule of law and human rights. From an alternative perspective to both secularism and fundamentalism, public theology today is therefore called upon to reconstruct and argumentatively justify the function of religious freedom as a basic principle of democratic society, within the framework of cognitive and normative disjunction between religion and citizenship which rules modernity. It is urgent to theologically demystify the regressive manipulation of this principle, as a vector of a democratically disruptive tribal pluralism, in contradiction with its nature as a catalyst for an integrative pluralism essential for social cohesion and the common good.Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica PortuguesaBartolomei, Teresa2022-03-10T16:10:12Z2021-11-222021-11-22T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/36987eng1872-5171info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-12T17:42:25Zoai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/36987Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:30:04.141830Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Religion and citizenship: the difference assured in pluralism and democracy as an antidote to new fundamentalisms |
title |
Religion and citizenship: the difference assured in pluralism and democracy as an antidote to new fundamentalisms |
spellingShingle |
Religion and citizenship: the difference assured in pluralism and democracy as an antidote to new fundamentalisms Bartolomei, Teresa Religious liberty Laïcité Secularization J.C. Murray Citizenship Religious fundamentalism |
title_short |
Religion and citizenship: the difference assured in pluralism and democracy as an antidote to new fundamentalisms |
title_full |
Religion and citizenship: the difference assured in pluralism and democracy as an antidote to new fundamentalisms |
title_fullStr |
Religion and citizenship: the difference assured in pluralism and democracy as an antidote to new fundamentalisms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Religion and citizenship: the difference assured in pluralism and democracy as an antidote to new fundamentalisms |
title_sort |
Religion and citizenship: the difference assured in pluralism and democracy as an antidote to new fundamentalisms |
author |
Bartolomei, Teresa |
author_facet |
Bartolomei, Teresa |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica Portuguesa |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bartolomei, Teresa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Religious liberty Laïcité Secularization J.C. Murray Citizenship Religious fundamentalism |
topic |
Religious liberty Laïcité Secularization J.C. Murray Citizenship Religious fundamentalism |
description |
If the paradigm of secularization as replacement was falsified by the permanent vitality of the religious dimension on the world horizon and in the public sphere, the universalization of the paradigm of secularization as differentiation, on the contrary, turns out to be an essential guarantee of the maintenance and promotion of the rule of law and human rights. From an alternative perspective to both secularism and fundamentalism, public theology today is therefore called upon to reconstruct and argumentatively justify the function of religious freedom as a basic principle of democratic society, within the framework of cognitive and normative disjunction between religion and citizenship which rules modernity. It is urgent to theologically demystify the regressive manipulation of this principle, as a vector of a democratically disruptive tribal pluralism, in contradiction with its nature as a catalyst for an integrative pluralism essential for social cohesion and the common good. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-11-22 2021-11-22T00:00:00Z 2022-03-10T16:10:12Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/36987 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/36987 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1872-5171 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799132021619949568 |