Religion and citizenship: the difference assured in pluralism and democracy as an antidote to new fundamentalisms

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bartolomei, Teresa
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/36987
Resumo: If the paradigm of secularization as replacement was falsified by the permanent vitality of the religious dimension on the world horizon and in the public sphere, the universalization of the paradigm of secularization as differentiation, on the contrary, turns out to be an essential guarantee of the maintenance and promotion of the rule of law and human rights. From an alternative perspective to both secularism and fundamentalism, public theology today is therefore called upon to reconstruct and argumentatively justify the function of religious freedom as a basic principle of democratic society, within the framework of cognitive and normative disjunction between religion and citizenship which rules modernity. It is urgent to theologically demystify the regressive manipulation of this principle, as a vector of a democratically disruptive tribal pluralism, in contradiction with its nature as a catalyst for an integrative pluralism essential for social cohesion and the common good.
id RCAP_f81760164adec000e59bd887fdbd8dba
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/36987
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Religion and citizenship: the difference assured in pluralism and democracy as an antidote to new fundamentalismsReligious libertyLaïcitéSecularizationJ.C. MurrayCitizenshipReligious fundamentalismIf the paradigm of secularization as replacement was falsified by the permanent vitality of the religious dimension on the world horizon and in the public sphere, the universalization of the paradigm of secularization as differentiation, on the contrary, turns out to be an essential guarantee of the maintenance and promotion of the rule of law and human rights. From an alternative perspective to both secularism and fundamentalism, public theology today is therefore called upon to reconstruct and argumentatively justify the function of religious freedom as a basic principle of democratic society, within the framework of cognitive and normative disjunction between religion and citizenship which rules modernity. It is urgent to theologically demystify the regressive manipulation of this principle, as a vector of a democratically disruptive tribal pluralism, in contradiction with its nature as a catalyst for an integrative pluralism essential for social cohesion and the common good.Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica PortuguesaBartolomei, Teresa2022-03-10T16:10:12Z2021-11-222021-11-22T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/36987eng1872-5171info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-12T17:42:25Zoai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/36987Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:30:04.141830Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Religion and citizenship: the difference assured in pluralism and democracy as an antidote to new fundamentalisms
title Religion and citizenship: the difference assured in pluralism and democracy as an antidote to new fundamentalisms
spellingShingle Religion and citizenship: the difference assured in pluralism and democracy as an antidote to new fundamentalisms
Bartolomei, Teresa
Religious liberty
Laïcité
Secularization
J.C. Murray
Citizenship
Religious fundamentalism
title_short Religion and citizenship: the difference assured in pluralism and democracy as an antidote to new fundamentalisms
title_full Religion and citizenship: the difference assured in pluralism and democracy as an antidote to new fundamentalisms
title_fullStr Religion and citizenship: the difference assured in pluralism and democracy as an antidote to new fundamentalisms
title_full_unstemmed Religion and citizenship: the difference assured in pluralism and democracy as an antidote to new fundamentalisms
title_sort Religion and citizenship: the difference assured in pluralism and democracy as an antidote to new fundamentalisms
author Bartolomei, Teresa
author_facet Bartolomei, Teresa
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica Portuguesa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bartolomei, Teresa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Religious liberty
Laïcité
Secularization
J.C. Murray
Citizenship
Religious fundamentalism
topic Religious liberty
Laïcité
Secularization
J.C. Murray
Citizenship
Religious fundamentalism
description If the paradigm of secularization as replacement was falsified by the permanent vitality of the religious dimension on the world horizon and in the public sphere, the universalization of the paradigm of secularization as differentiation, on the contrary, turns out to be an essential guarantee of the maintenance and promotion of the rule of law and human rights. From an alternative perspective to both secularism and fundamentalism, public theology today is therefore called upon to reconstruct and argumentatively justify the function of religious freedom as a basic principle of democratic society, within the framework of cognitive and normative disjunction between religion and citizenship which rules modernity. It is urgent to theologically demystify the regressive manipulation of this principle, as a vector of a democratically disruptive tribal pluralism, in contradiction with its nature as a catalyst for an integrative pluralism essential for social cohesion and the common good.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-11-22
2021-11-22T00:00:00Z
2022-03-10T16:10:12Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/36987
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/36987
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1872-5171
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132021619949568