Measuring Online Political Dialogue: Does Polarization Trigger More Deliberation?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Serrano-Contreras, Ignacio-Jesús
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: García-Marín, Javier, Luengo, Óscar G.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i4.3149
Resumo: In recent years, we have witnessed an increasing consolidation of different realms where citizens can deliberate and discuss a variety of topics of general interest, including politics. The comments on news posts in online media are a good example. The first theoretical contributions called attention to the potential of those spaces to build a healthy (civic and participatory) public sphere, going much deeper in the process of political dialogue and deliberation (Fung, Gilman, & Shkabatur, 2013; Lilleker & Jackson, 2008; O’Reilly, 2005; Stromer-Galley & Wichowski, 2011). Polarization has been configured as a constant feature of the quality of the mentioned dialogues, particularly in Mediterranean countries (polarized pluralists’ cases). One of the research challenges at the moment has to do with the scrutiny of polarization within the political deliberation provoked by news stories. The goal of this article is the analysis of political dialogue from the perspective of the polarization in the increasingly popular network YouTube, which is presenting very particular characteristics. Using a sample of almost 400,000 posted comments about diverse topics (climate change, the Catalonian crisis, and Political parties’ electoral ads) we propose an automated method in order to measure polarization. Our hypothesis is that the number of comments (quantitative variable) is positively related to their polarization (qualitative variable). We will also include in the examination information about the ideological editorial line of newspapers, the type of topic under discussion, the amount of traceable dialogue, etc. We propose an index to (1) measure the polarization of each comment and use it to show how this value has behaved over time; and (2) verify the hypothesis using the average polarization of comments for each video.
id RCAP_f93fa90cf30d94a7bc5e5a7c425b78ea
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3149
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Measuring Online Political Dialogue: Does Polarization Trigger More Deliberation?algorithms; polarization; public sphere; social media; text mining; YouTubeIn recent years, we have witnessed an increasing consolidation of different realms where citizens can deliberate and discuss a variety of topics of general interest, including politics. The comments on news posts in online media are a good example. The first theoretical contributions called attention to the potential of those spaces to build a healthy (civic and participatory) public sphere, going much deeper in the process of political dialogue and deliberation (Fung, Gilman, & Shkabatur, 2013; Lilleker & Jackson, 2008; O’Reilly, 2005; Stromer-Galley & Wichowski, 2011). Polarization has been configured as a constant feature of the quality of the mentioned dialogues, particularly in Mediterranean countries (polarized pluralists’ cases). One of the research challenges at the moment has to do with the scrutiny of polarization within the political deliberation provoked by news stories. The goal of this article is the analysis of political dialogue from the perspective of the polarization in the increasingly popular network YouTube, which is presenting very particular characteristics. Using a sample of almost 400,000 posted comments about diverse topics (climate change, the Catalonian crisis, and Political parties’ electoral ads) we propose an automated method in order to measure polarization. Our hypothesis is that the number of comments (quantitative variable) is positively related to their polarization (qualitative variable). We will also include in the examination information about the ideological editorial line of newspapers, the type of topic under discussion, the amount of traceable dialogue, etc. We propose an index to (1) measure the polarization of each comment and use it to show how this value has behaved over time; and (2) verify the hypothesis using the average polarization of comments for each video.Cogitatio2020-10-08info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i4.3149oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3149Media and Communication; Vol 8, No 4 (2020): The Ongoing Transformation of the Digital Public Sphere; 63-722183-2439reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3149https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i4.3149https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3149/3149Copyright (c) 2020 Ignacio-Jesús Serrano-Contreras, Javier García-Marín, Óscar G. Luengohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSerrano-Contreras, Ignacio-JesúsGarcía-Marín, JavierLuengo, Óscar G.2022-12-20T10:58:53Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3149Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:09.550213Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Measuring Online Political Dialogue: Does Polarization Trigger More Deliberation?
title Measuring Online Political Dialogue: Does Polarization Trigger More Deliberation?
spellingShingle Measuring Online Political Dialogue: Does Polarization Trigger More Deliberation?
Serrano-Contreras, Ignacio-Jesús
algorithms; polarization; public sphere; social media; text mining; YouTube
title_short Measuring Online Political Dialogue: Does Polarization Trigger More Deliberation?
title_full Measuring Online Political Dialogue: Does Polarization Trigger More Deliberation?
title_fullStr Measuring Online Political Dialogue: Does Polarization Trigger More Deliberation?
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Online Political Dialogue: Does Polarization Trigger More Deliberation?
title_sort Measuring Online Political Dialogue: Does Polarization Trigger More Deliberation?
author Serrano-Contreras, Ignacio-Jesús
author_facet Serrano-Contreras, Ignacio-Jesús
García-Marín, Javier
Luengo, Óscar G.
author_role author
author2 García-Marín, Javier
Luengo, Óscar G.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Serrano-Contreras, Ignacio-Jesús
García-Marín, Javier
Luengo, Óscar G.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv algorithms; polarization; public sphere; social media; text mining; YouTube
topic algorithms; polarization; public sphere; social media; text mining; YouTube
description In recent years, we have witnessed an increasing consolidation of different realms where citizens can deliberate and discuss a variety of topics of general interest, including politics. The comments on news posts in online media are a good example. The first theoretical contributions called attention to the potential of those spaces to build a healthy (civic and participatory) public sphere, going much deeper in the process of political dialogue and deliberation (Fung, Gilman, & Shkabatur, 2013; Lilleker & Jackson, 2008; O’Reilly, 2005; Stromer-Galley & Wichowski, 2011). Polarization has been configured as a constant feature of the quality of the mentioned dialogues, particularly in Mediterranean countries (polarized pluralists’ cases). One of the research challenges at the moment has to do with the scrutiny of polarization within the political deliberation provoked by news stories. The goal of this article is the analysis of political dialogue from the perspective of the polarization in the increasingly popular network YouTube, which is presenting very particular characteristics. Using a sample of almost 400,000 posted comments about diverse topics (climate change, the Catalonian crisis, and Political parties’ electoral ads) we propose an automated method in order to measure polarization. Our hypothesis is that the number of comments (quantitative variable) is positively related to their polarization (qualitative variable). We will also include in the examination information about the ideological editorial line of newspapers, the type of topic under discussion, the amount of traceable dialogue, etc. We propose an index to (1) measure the polarization of each comment and use it to show how this value has behaved over time; and (2) verify the hypothesis using the average polarization of comments for each video.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-08
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i4.3149
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3149
url https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i4.3149
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3149
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3149
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i4.3149
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3149/3149
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Ignacio-Jesús Serrano-Contreras, Javier García-Marín, Óscar G. Luengo
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Ignacio-Jesús Serrano-Contreras, Javier García-Marín, Óscar G. Luengo
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Media and Communication; Vol 8, No 4 (2020): The Ongoing Transformation of the Digital Public Sphere; 63-72
2183-2439
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130658733293568