Risk parity: true versus naive approach

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alves, Gonçalo Filipe Abreu
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/15043
Resumo: This paper studies the performance of two different Risk Parity strategies, one from Maillard (2008) and a “naïve” that was already used by market practitioners, against traditional strategies. The tests will compare different regions (US, UK, Germany and Japan) since 1991 to 2013, and will use different ways of volatility. The main findings are that Risk Parity outperforms any traditional strategy, and the “true” (by Maillard) has considerable better results than the “naïve” when using historical volatility, while using EWMA there are significant differences.
id RCAP_fc7474314d2afd7956b1de1a832454bb
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/15043
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Risk parity: true versus naive approachRisk parityEqual risk contributionsERC portfolioAsset allocationThis paper studies the performance of two different Risk Parity strategies, one from Maillard (2008) and a “naïve” that was already used by market practitioners, against traditional strategies. The tests will compare different regions (US, UK, Germany and Japan) since 1991 to 2013, and will use different ways of volatility. The main findings are that Risk Parity outperforms any traditional strategy, and the “true” (by Maillard) has considerable better results than the “naïve” when using historical volatility, while using EWMA there are significant differences.NSBE - UNLEça, Afonso FuzetaRUNAlves, Gonçalo Filipe Abreu2015-06-02T10:36:37Z2014-052014-05-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/15043TID:201474832enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T03:50:37Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/15043Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:22:15.196439Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Risk parity: true versus naive approach
title Risk parity: true versus naive approach
spellingShingle Risk parity: true versus naive approach
Alves, Gonçalo Filipe Abreu
Risk parity
Equal risk contributions
ERC portfolio
Asset allocation
title_short Risk parity: true versus naive approach
title_full Risk parity: true versus naive approach
title_fullStr Risk parity: true versus naive approach
title_full_unstemmed Risk parity: true versus naive approach
title_sort Risk parity: true versus naive approach
author Alves, Gonçalo Filipe Abreu
author_facet Alves, Gonçalo Filipe Abreu
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Eça, Afonso Fuzeta
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves, Gonçalo Filipe Abreu
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Risk parity
Equal risk contributions
ERC portfolio
Asset allocation
topic Risk parity
Equal risk contributions
ERC portfolio
Asset allocation
description This paper studies the performance of two different Risk Parity strategies, one from Maillard (2008) and a “naïve” that was already used by market practitioners, against traditional strategies. The tests will compare different regions (US, UK, Germany and Japan) since 1991 to 2013, and will use different ways of volatility. The main findings are that Risk Parity outperforms any traditional strategy, and the “true” (by Maillard) has considerable better results than the “naïve” when using historical volatility, while using EWMA there are significant differences.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-05
2014-05-01T00:00:00Z
2015-06-02T10:36:37Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/15043
TID:201474832
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/15043
identifier_str_mv TID:201474832
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137861992185856