The direct actions of unconstitutionality proposed by political parties during the Michel Temer administration (2016/2018)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
Texto Completo: | https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/733 |
Resumo: | The 1988 Constitution placed great emphasis on the importance of political parties to the democratic game and endowed them with several prerogatives and instruments for healthy action in favor of maintaining the democratic system. And it is around this premise that the article is developed seeking to identify traits about the performance of the parties in the opening of Direct Actions of Unconstitutionality (ADI) with the STF in the presidential government of Michel Temer (2016/2018). The method adopted is exploratory-descriptive quantitative research on the 534 ADI proposed to the STF between 2016 and 2018. It was also adopted the use of bibliographic research on the literature that deals with the judicialization of politics and the performance of the parties as relevant actors in requesting the intervention of the Judiciary in given matters. Among the conclusions it is observed that in the investigated period 13% of the ADI, which corresponds to 70, were proposed by the parties. In this amount, we highlight the parties with less parliamentary representation that were more active in the use of lawsuits. The opposition parties to the federal government energetically used the constitutional prerogative conferred, with a high number of ADI, which suggests that legal actions are placed as instruments of political and electoral strategy for opposition parties to mark their place in government. |
id |
RPED-1_3533a4afeb7c3f1cac9d02dcb18e6847 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/733 |
network_acronym_str |
RPED-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The direct actions of unconstitutionality proposed by political parties during the Michel Temer administration (2016/2018)As ações diretas de inconstitucionalidade propostas pelos partidos políticos durante o governo Michel Temer (2016/2018)political partiesjudicialization of politicsdirect action of unconstitutionallypartidos políticosjudicialização da políticaação direta de inconstitucionalidadeThe 1988 Constitution placed great emphasis on the importance of political parties to the democratic game and endowed them with several prerogatives and instruments for healthy action in favor of maintaining the democratic system. And it is around this premise that the article is developed seeking to identify traits about the performance of the parties in the opening of Direct Actions of Unconstitutionality (ADI) with the STF in the presidential government of Michel Temer (2016/2018). The method adopted is exploratory-descriptive quantitative research on the 534 ADI proposed to the STF between 2016 and 2018. It was also adopted the use of bibliographic research on the literature that deals with the judicialization of politics and the performance of the parties as relevant actors in requesting the intervention of the Judiciary in given matters. Among the conclusions it is observed that in the investigated period 13% of the ADI, which corresponds to 70, were proposed by the parties. In this amount, we highlight the parties with less parliamentary representation that were more active in the use of lawsuits. The opposition parties to the federal government energetically used the constitutional prerogative conferred, with a high number of ADI, which suggests that legal actions are placed as instruments of political and electoral strategy for opposition parties to mark their place in government.A Constituição de 1988 resguardou com grande ênfase a importância dos partidos políticos no jogo democrático e os dotou de diversas prerrogativas e instrumentos para atuação salutar em prol da manutenção do sistema democrático. É em torno dessa premissa que o artigo é desenvolvido buscando identificar traços sobre a atuação dos partidos na abertura de Ações Diretas de Inconstitucionalidade (ADI) junto ao STF no governo presidencial de Michel Temer (2016/2018). O método adotado é de pesquisa exploratória-descritiva quantitativa sobre as 534 ADI propostas ao STF entre 2016 e 2018. Adotou-se também o uso da pesquisa bibliográfica sobre a literatura que trata a judicialização da política e da atuação das siglas como atores relevantes na solicitação da intervenção do Judiciário em dados assuntos. Dentre as conclusões observa-se que no período investigado 13% do total das ADI, isto é 70 foram propostas pelos partidos. Nesse montante destaque para as siglas com menor representação parlamentar no período que se mostraram mais atuantes no uso das ações judiciais. Os partidos de oposição ao governo federal usaram de modo enérgico da prerrogativa constitucional conferida, com elevado número de ADI o que sugere que as ações judiciais se colocam como instrumentos de estratégia política e eleitoral para os partidos de oposição marcar o lugar no governo.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2023-07-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/73310.19092/reed.v10.733Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 10 (2023): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-36Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 10 (2023): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-362319-081710.19092/reed.v10reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/733/457Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Quadros, DoacirBueno de Castro, Fernando2024-03-10T15:52:48Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/733Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2024-03-10T15:52:48Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The direct actions of unconstitutionality proposed by political parties during the Michel Temer administration (2016/2018) As ações diretas de inconstitucionalidade propostas pelos partidos políticos durante o governo Michel Temer (2016/2018) |
title |
The direct actions of unconstitutionality proposed by political parties during the Michel Temer administration (2016/2018) |
spellingShingle |
The direct actions of unconstitutionality proposed by political parties during the Michel Temer administration (2016/2018) de Quadros, Doacir political parties judicialization of politics direct action of unconstitutionally partidos políticos judicialização da política ação direta de inconstitucionalidade |
title_short |
The direct actions of unconstitutionality proposed by political parties during the Michel Temer administration (2016/2018) |
title_full |
The direct actions of unconstitutionality proposed by political parties during the Michel Temer administration (2016/2018) |
title_fullStr |
The direct actions of unconstitutionality proposed by political parties during the Michel Temer administration (2016/2018) |
title_full_unstemmed |
The direct actions of unconstitutionality proposed by political parties during the Michel Temer administration (2016/2018) |
title_sort |
The direct actions of unconstitutionality proposed by political parties during the Michel Temer administration (2016/2018) |
author |
de Quadros, Doacir |
author_facet |
de Quadros, Doacir Bueno de Castro, Fernando |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bueno de Castro, Fernando |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Quadros, Doacir Bueno de Castro, Fernando |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
political parties judicialization of politics direct action of unconstitutionally partidos políticos judicialização da política ação direta de inconstitucionalidade |
topic |
political parties judicialization of politics direct action of unconstitutionally partidos políticos judicialização da política ação direta de inconstitucionalidade |
description |
The 1988 Constitution placed great emphasis on the importance of political parties to the democratic game and endowed them with several prerogatives and instruments for healthy action in favor of maintaining the democratic system. And it is around this premise that the article is developed seeking to identify traits about the performance of the parties in the opening of Direct Actions of Unconstitutionality (ADI) with the STF in the presidential government of Michel Temer (2016/2018). The method adopted is exploratory-descriptive quantitative research on the 534 ADI proposed to the STF between 2016 and 2018. It was also adopted the use of bibliographic research on the literature that deals with the judicialization of politics and the performance of the parties as relevant actors in requesting the intervention of the Judiciary in given matters. Among the conclusions it is observed that in the investigated period 13% of the ADI, which corresponds to 70, were proposed by the parties. In this amount, we highlight the parties with less parliamentary representation that were more active in the use of lawsuits. The opposition parties to the federal government energetically used the constitutional prerogative conferred, with a high number of ADI, which suggests that legal actions are placed as instruments of political and electoral strategy for opposition parties to mark their place in government. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/733 10.19092/reed.v10.733 |
url |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/733 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19092/reed.v10.733 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/733/457 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 10 (2023): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-36 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 10 (2023): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-36 2319-0817 10.19092/reed.v10 reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) instacron:RPED |
instname_str |
Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
instacron_str |
RPED |
institution |
RPED |
reponame_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
collection |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799138702546436096 |