The challenges of the insider researcher: reflexivity, triangulation and ethical concerns in qualitative research in institutions in which they work

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cunha Filho, Marcio
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
Texto Completo: https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/361
Resumo: This article explores a frequent albeit rarely discussed issue in judicial research: the challenges of doing qualitative research in which the researcher is an insider, that is, when he investigates the institution in which he works. This article reflects on methodological and ethical strategies aimed at overcoming biases in native qualitative researches, in order to provide researchers with tools to produce more reliable research in the future. The study explores four research strategies adopted in the author’s doctoral thesis: reflexivity, which means reflecting about how one’s epistemological position affects the collection of data and its results; triangulation, which is related to collection of data in different sources and different levels of analysis; case selection through transparent criteria that include negative or dissonant cases that contradict the author’s initial research hypothesis; and, finally, the adoption of ethical concerns, such as anonymity, respondent validation and the approval of the research project in the Ethics Committee.
id RPED-1_40c4af88b5ae6210a7f0c4568ac457fc
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/361
network_acronym_str RPED-1
network_name_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository_id_str
spelling The challenges of the insider researcher: reflexivity, triangulation and ethical concerns in qualitative research in institutions in which they workOs desafios do pesquisador nativo: reflexividade, triangulação e questões éticas em pesquisas qualitativas que envolvem o local de trabalho do pesquisadorThis article explores a frequent albeit rarely discussed issue in judicial research: the challenges of doing qualitative research in which the researcher is an insider, that is, when he investigates the institution in which he works. This article reflects on methodological and ethical strategies aimed at overcoming biases in native qualitative researches, in order to provide researchers with tools to produce more reliable research in the future. The study explores four research strategies adopted in the author’s doctoral thesis: reflexivity, which means reflecting about how one’s epistemological position affects the collection of data and its results; triangulation, which is related to collection of data in different sources and different levels of analysis; case selection through transparent criteria that include negative or dissonant cases that contradict the author’s initial research hypothesis; and, finally, the adoption of ethical concerns, such as anonymity, respondent validation and the approval of the research project in the Ethics Committee.Este artigo explora uma situação frequente, porém pouco debatida em pesquisas jurídicas: os desafios metodológicos e éticos da realização de pesquisas nativas, em que o pesquisador trabalha profissionalmente na instituição que estuda. O objetivo do artigo é explorar as estratégias metodológicas e éticas adotadas na tese de doutorado do autor para superar vieses de pesquisas nativas qualitativas, com a finalidade de contribuir para que futuras pesquisas feitas por insiders obtenham resultados mais confiáveis. O artigo demonstra quatro estratégias utilizadas na pesquisa de campo realizada pelo autor em seu ambiente de trabalho: a reflexividade, que envolve a compreensão e reflexão sobre o próprio posicionamento epistemológico e a sua influência na coleta de dados de pesquisa; a triangulação, que diz respeito à coleta de dados em fontes diversas de diferentes níveis de análise; a adoção de critérios para seleção de casos de estudo de forma transparente e que envolva o enfrentamento de casos dissonantes, isto é, casos que não se enquadram na hipótese de pesquisa preliminar do autor; e, por fim, a adoção de cuidados éticos, tais como o anonimato, a validação do respondente e a aprovação de projeto de pesquisa no Comitê de Ética em PesquisaRede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2019-08-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/36110.19092/reed.v6i2.361Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2019): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal StudiesRevista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 6 n. 2 (2019): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2319-081710.19092/reed.v6i2reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/361/218Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCunha Filho, Marcio2020-07-05T16:21:52Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/361Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2020-07-05T16:21:52Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The challenges of the insider researcher: reflexivity, triangulation and ethical concerns in qualitative research in institutions in which they work
Os desafios do pesquisador nativo: reflexividade, triangulação e questões éticas em pesquisas qualitativas que envolvem o local de trabalho do pesquisador
title The challenges of the insider researcher: reflexivity, triangulation and ethical concerns in qualitative research in institutions in which they work
spellingShingle The challenges of the insider researcher: reflexivity, triangulation and ethical concerns in qualitative research in institutions in which they work
Cunha Filho, Marcio
title_short The challenges of the insider researcher: reflexivity, triangulation and ethical concerns in qualitative research in institutions in which they work
title_full The challenges of the insider researcher: reflexivity, triangulation and ethical concerns in qualitative research in institutions in which they work
title_fullStr The challenges of the insider researcher: reflexivity, triangulation and ethical concerns in qualitative research in institutions in which they work
title_full_unstemmed The challenges of the insider researcher: reflexivity, triangulation and ethical concerns in qualitative research in institutions in which they work
title_sort The challenges of the insider researcher: reflexivity, triangulation and ethical concerns in qualitative research in institutions in which they work
author Cunha Filho, Marcio
author_facet Cunha Filho, Marcio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cunha Filho, Marcio
description This article explores a frequent albeit rarely discussed issue in judicial research: the challenges of doing qualitative research in which the researcher is an insider, that is, when he investigates the institution in which he works. This article reflects on methodological and ethical strategies aimed at overcoming biases in native qualitative researches, in order to provide researchers with tools to produce more reliable research in the future. The study explores four research strategies adopted in the author’s doctoral thesis: reflexivity, which means reflecting about how one’s epistemological position affects the collection of data and its results; triangulation, which is related to collection of data in different sources and different levels of analysis; case selection through transparent criteria that include negative or dissonant cases that contradict the author’s initial research hypothesis; and, finally, the adoption of ethical concerns, such as anonymity, respondent validation and the approval of the research project in the Ethics Committee.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/361
10.19092/reed.v6i2.361
url https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/361
identifier_str_mv 10.19092/reed.v6i2.361
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/361/218
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2019): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 6 n. 2 (2019): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
2319-0817
10.19092/reed.v6i2
reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron:RPED
instname_str Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron_str RPED
institution RPED
reponame_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
collection Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com
_version_ 1799138703560409088