Decision-making process of Supreme Court in Brazil’s democratic transition (1978-1988)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Fabiana Luci de
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Bassi Stern, Rafael, Noli, Ana Fernanda
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
Texto Completo: https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/563
Resumo: This paper describes the dynamics of Brazil's Supreme Court decision-making in the period of democratic transition. It describes how the sitting Justices of the Supreme Court, from 1978 to 1988, decide judicial review cases. Our goal is to identify through the W-Nominate method the formation of coalitions, and to verify whether they can be explained by presidential nominations and past career paths of Justices. We conclude that the court was quite consensual during the democratic transition, since only 11% of the 703 judicial review cases filed and judged in the period, were decided by a majority. The model showed that although the presidential nomination helps to understand the formation of coalitions, this factor is not sufficient to explain the pattern of divergence among the Justices.
id RPED-1_c4abb5c252b23c0235703a17bf506d68
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/563
network_acronym_str RPED-1
network_name_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository_id_str
spelling Decision-making process of Supreme Court in Brazil’s democratic transition (1978-1988)Processo decisório do Supremo Tribunal Federal na transição democrática brasileira (1978-1988)Processo decisório judicialSTFpadrões de divergênciaThis paper describes the dynamics of Brazil's Supreme Court decision-making in the period of democratic transition. It describes how the sitting Justices of the Supreme Court, from 1978 to 1988, decide judicial review cases. Our goal is to identify through the W-Nominate method the formation of coalitions, and to verify whether they can be explained by presidential nominations and past career paths of Justices. We conclude that the court was quite consensual during the democratic transition, since only 11% of the 703 judicial review cases filed and judged in the period, were decided by a majority. The model showed that although the presidential nomination helps to understand the formation of coalitions, this factor is not sufficient to explain the pattern of divergence among the Justices.O artigo descreve a dinâmica do processo decisório do STF no período de transição democrática, observando como os ministros que integraram o tribunal entre os anos de 1978 e 1988 se compuseram para decidir casos de controle abstrato de constitucionalidade. Nosso objetivo é identificar a formação de coalizões, e verificar se, e em que medida, as nomeações presidenciais e as trajetórias de carreira pregressas dos ministros ajudam a explicar essas coalizões, a partir do emprego do método de escalonamento multidimensional de votos W-Nominate. Concluímos que o STF foi bastante consensual no período de transição democrática, sendo que do total de 703 representações de inconstitucionalidade impetradas e julgadas no período, apenas 11% foram decididas de forma majoritária. O modelo mostrou que, embora a nomeação presidencial ajude a compreender a formação de coalizões, não é fator suficiente para explicar o padrão de divergência entre os ministros.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2022-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/563Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 9 (2022): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-27Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 9 (2022): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-272319-081710.19092/reed.v9reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/563/360Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Fabiana Luci deBassi Stern, RafaelNoli, Ana Fernanda2023-04-04T15:11:03Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/563Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2023-04-04T15:11:03Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Decision-making process of Supreme Court in Brazil’s democratic transition (1978-1988)
Processo decisório do Supremo Tribunal Federal na transição democrática brasileira (1978-1988)
title Decision-making process of Supreme Court in Brazil’s democratic transition (1978-1988)
spellingShingle Decision-making process of Supreme Court in Brazil’s democratic transition (1978-1988)
Oliveira, Fabiana Luci de
Processo decisório judicial
STF
padrões de divergência
title_short Decision-making process of Supreme Court in Brazil’s democratic transition (1978-1988)
title_full Decision-making process of Supreme Court in Brazil’s democratic transition (1978-1988)
title_fullStr Decision-making process of Supreme Court in Brazil’s democratic transition (1978-1988)
title_full_unstemmed Decision-making process of Supreme Court in Brazil’s democratic transition (1978-1988)
title_sort Decision-making process of Supreme Court in Brazil’s democratic transition (1978-1988)
author Oliveira, Fabiana Luci de
author_facet Oliveira, Fabiana Luci de
Bassi Stern, Rafael
Noli, Ana Fernanda
author_role author
author2 Bassi Stern, Rafael
Noli, Ana Fernanda
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Fabiana Luci de
Bassi Stern, Rafael
Noli, Ana Fernanda
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Processo decisório judicial
STF
padrões de divergência
topic Processo decisório judicial
STF
padrões de divergência
description This paper describes the dynamics of Brazil's Supreme Court decision-making in the period of democratic transition. It describes how the sitting Justices of the Supreme Court, from 1978 to 1988, decide judicial review cases. Our goal is to identify through the W-Nominate method the formation of coalitions, and to verify whether they can be explained by presidential nominations and past career paths of Justices. We conclude that the court was quite consensual during the democratic transition, since only 11% of the 703 judicial review cases filed and judged in the period, were decided by a majority. The model showed that although the presidential nomination helps to understand the formation of coalitions, this factor is not sufficient to explain the pattern of divergence among the Justices.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/563
url https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/563
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/563/360
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 9 (2022): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-27
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 9 (2022): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-27
2319-0817
10.19092/reed.v9
reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron:RPED
instname_str Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron_str RPED
institution RPED
reponame_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
collection Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com
_version_ 1799138702451015680