Safety of Transrectal or Transvaginal Drainage of Pelvic Abscesses

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ilyas,Mohammed Iyoob Mohammed
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Kandagatla,Pridvi, Reickert,Craig A., Nalamati,Surya, Webb,Shawn P., Szilagy,Eric J., Stefanou,Amalia J.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632021000100047
Resumo: Abstract Objective The literature on the safety and long-term sequelae of transrectal and transvaginal drainage of pelvic abscesses is limited. We evaluated the outcomes and safety of pelvic abscess drainage by interventional radiology at our institution. Methods After obtaining institutional review board approval, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of transrectal and transvaginal pelvic abscesses drainage using computed tomography, endorectal ultrasound, and or fluoroscopy. Results The study included 26 patients, with an age range of 24 to 88 years old, out of whom 53.8% were men. A total of 46.1% of the participants were African Americans and 26.9% were Caucasians. The average body mass index was 28.4 (range: 15.6 to 41.9). The most common etiology was penetrating abdominal injury (27%), followed by appendectomy (23%), diverticular disease (11.5%), anastomotic leak (11.5%), and disorders of gynecological causes (11.5%). The mean abscess diameter was 6.3 cm (range: 3.3 to 10.0 cm). Transrectal drainage was performed in all except one patient who had a transvaginal drainage. Transrectal ultrasound was used for drainage in 92.3% cases, and fluoroscopy was used as an additional imaging modality in 75% of the cases. An 8- or 10-Fr pigtail catheter was used in>80% of the patients. Drains were removed between 2 and 7 days in 92.3% of the cases. The average follow-up was 30.4 months (range: 1 to 107 months), and no long-term complications were reported. Only one patient required subsequent operative intervention for an anastomotic leak. Conclusions Pelvic abscess drainage by transrectal route using radiological guidance is a safe and effective procedure.
id SBCP-1_b734b791fc201448b289bc989ad69f38
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2237-93632021000100047
network_acronym_str SBCP-1
network_name_str Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Safety of Transrectal or Transvaginal Drainage of Pelvic Abscessestransrectaltransvaginalpelvic abscessinterventional drainageAbstract Objective The literature on the safety and long-term sequelae of transrectal and transvaginal drainage of pelvic abscesses is limited. We evaluated the outcomes and safety of pelvic abscess drainage by interventional radiology at our institution. Methods After obtaining institutional review board approval, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of transrectal and transvaginal pelvic abscesses drainage using computed tomography, endorectal ultrasound, and or fluoroscopy. Results The study included 26 patients, with an age range of 24 to 88 years old, out of whom 53.8% were men. A total of 46.1% of the participants were African Americans and 26.9% were Caucasians. The average body mass index was 28.4 (range: 15.6 to 41.9). The most common etiology was penetrating abdominal injury (27%), followed by appendectomy (23%), diverticular disease (11.5%), anastomotic leak (11.5%), and disorders of gynecological causes (11.5%). The mean abscess diameter was 6.3 cm (range: 3.3 to 10.0 cm). Transrectal drainage was performed in all except one patient who had a transvaginal drainage. Transrectal ultrasound was used for drainage in 92.3% cases, and fluoroscopy was used as an additional imaging modality in 75% of the cases. An 8- or 10-Fr pigtail catheter was used in>80% of the patients. Drains were removed between 2 and 7 days in 92.3% of the cases. The average follow-up was 30.4 months (range: 1 to 107 months), and no long-term complications were reported. Only one patient required subsequent operative intervention for an anastomotic leak. Conclusions Pelvic abscess drainage by transrectal route using radiological guidance is a safe and effective procedure.Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia2021-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632021000100047Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) v.41 n.1 2021reponame:Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)instacron:SBCP10.1055/s-0041-1724059info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIlyas,Mohammed Iyoob MohammedKandagatla,PridviReickert,Craig A.Nalamati,SuryaWebb,Shawn P.Szilagy,Eric J.Stefanou,Amalia J.eng2021-07-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2237-93632021000100047Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=2237-9363&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sbcp@sbcp.org.br2317-64232237-9363opendoar:2021-07-14T00:00Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Safety of Transrectal or Transvaginal Drainage of Pelvic Abscesses
title Safety of Transrectal or Transvaginal Drainage of Pelvic Abscesses
spellingShingle Safety of Transrectal or Transvaginal Drainage of Pelvic Abscesses
Ilyas,Mohammed Iyoob Mohammed
transrectal
transvaginal
pelvic abscess
interventional drainage
title_short Safety of Transrectal or Transvaginal Drainage of Pelvic Abscesses
title_full Safety of Transrectal or Transvaginal Drainage of Pelvic Abscesses
title_fullStr Safety of Transrectal or Transvaginal Drainage of Pelvic Abscesses
title_full_unstemmed Safety of Transrectal or Transvaginal Drainage of Pelvic Abscesses
title_sort Safety of Transrectal or Transvaginal Drainage of Pelvic Abscesses
author Ilyas,Mohammed Iyoob Mohammed
author_facet Ilyas,Mohammed Iyoob Mohammed
Kandagatla,Pridvi
Reickert,Craig A.
Nalamati,Surya
Webb,Shawn P.
Szilagy,Eric J.
Stefanou,Amalia J.
author_role author
author2 Kandagatla,Pridvi
Reickert,Craig A.
Nalamati,Surya
Webb,Shawn P.
Szilagy,Eric J.
Stefanou,Amalia J.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ilyas,Mohammed Iyoob Mohammed
Kandagatla,Pridvi
Reickert,Craig A.
Nalamati,Surya
Webb,Shawn P.
Szilagy,Eric J.
Stefanou,Amalia J.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv transrectal
transvaginal
pelvic abscess
interventional drainage
topic transrectal
transvaginal
pelvic abscess
interventional drainage
description Abstract Objective The literature on the safety and long-term sequelae of transrectal and transvaginal drainage of pelvic abscesses is limited. We evaluated the outcomes and safety of pelvic abscess drainage by interventional radiology at our institution. Methods After obtaining institutional review board approval, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of transrectal and transvaginal pelvic abscesses drainage using computed tomography, endorectal ultrasound, and or fluoroscopy. Results The study included 26 patients, with an age range of 24 to 88 years old, out of whom 53.8% were men. A total of 46.1% of the participants were African Americans and 26.9% were Caucasians. The average body mass index was 28.4 (range: 15.6 to 41.9). The most common etiology was penetrating abdominal injury (27%), followed by appendectomy (23%), diverticular disease (11.5%), anastomotic leak (11.5%), and disorders of gynecological causes (11.5%). The mean abscess diameter was 6.3 cm (range: 3.3 to 10.0 cm). Transrectal drainage was performed in all except one patient who had a transvaginal drainage. Transrectal ultrasound was used for drainage in 92.3% cases, and fluoroscopy was used as an additional imaging modality in 75% of the cases. An 8- or 10-Fr pigtail catheter was used in>80% of the patients. Drains were removed between 2 and 7 days in 92.3% of the cases. The average follow-up was 30.4 months (range: 1 to 107 months), and no long-term complications were reported. Only one patient required subsequent operative intervention for an anastomotic leak. Conclusions Pelvic abscess drainage by transrectal route using radiological guidance is a safe and effective procedure.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632021000100047
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632021000100047
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1055/s-0041-1724059
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) v.41 n.1 2021
reponame:Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
instacron:SBCP
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
instacron_str SBCP
institution SBCP
reponame_str Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
collection Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sbcp@sbcp.org.br
_version_ 1752126479153496064