Impact evaluation of the geometry on measurements of solid radioactive waste exposure rates in nuclear medicine

• Autor(a) principal: Brambilla,Cláudia Régio
• Data de Publicação: 2014
• Outros Autores: Hoff,Gabriela
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica (Online)
• Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-31512014000400006
• topic: Radioactive solid waste; Nuclear medicine; Exposure rate; Monte Carlo simulations

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this paper is to verify the influence of the source geometry on Geiger Müller (GM) exposure rate data. This paper presents a validation of an application based on Monte Carlo (MC) data simulated using Geant4, based on a comparison of the exposure rates calculated via MC and Deterministic Calculations (DC) to experimental (measured) exposure rates. METHODS: Experimental data that were collected through measurements of standard sources were used for MC and DC validation. In addition, the best method of analyzing the impact of the real source geometry on calculations of a descarpack box of radioactive waste was verified. Furthermore, were estimated the exposure rates from a homogeneous solid waste box (used at clinical sites) and from a point source. These results were compared to confirm possible discrepancies related to source geometry in exposure rates collected using a GM detector. RESULTS: The investigated estimation methods were statistically compared; the MC presented higher agreement with the experimental data than did the deterministic calculations. The impact of considering a point source instead of the real geometry (descarpack box) was an underestimation of between 20% and 70%, depending on the source - detector distance and the isotope evaluated. CONCLUSION: The DC always presented a higher difference with respect to the experimental data than did the MC calculation. The use of realistic geometry proved to exert a significant impact on the exposure rate data for solid radioactive waste compared with the exposure rate induced by a point source; the exposure rate estimation obtained using the real geometry was always at least 16% higher than the estimation obtained for a point source, and some differences greater than 50% were found.