Comparison of performance with hearing aid programmed to NAL-NL1 first-fit and optimized-fit

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Narayanan,Sreena Ediyarath
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Manjula,Puttabasappa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: CoDAS
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822022000100303
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose The initial-fit provided by the hearing aid manufacturer’s software is generally a display of measurement done in the ear simulators. The need for verification of hearing aid output and gain in the real ear using probe-microphone measurement to match the prescriptive target is highlighted. The objective of the study was to evaluate the difference in real-ear aided response (REAR), real-ear insertion gain (REIG), aided thresholds, articulation index (AI) and word recognition score (WRS) in quiet, with hearing aid programmed to NAL-NL1 first-fit and NAL-NL1 optimized-fit using the probe-microphone technique. Methods In a repeated measure experimental design, 11 participants with a mean age of 41.09 (SD=±9.95) years having moderate and moderately-severe sensorineural hearing loss were tested monaurally in two aided conditions, with a 16-channel hearing aid programmed for manufacturer’s NAL-NL1 first-fit and optimized-fit to NAL-NL1 using probe-microphone verification. The REAR, REIG, aided threshold, articulation index and word recognition scores in quiet were obtained for both aided conditions. Results The REAR, REIG, aided threshold, AI and WRS in quiet were significantly better with the NAL-NL1 optimized-fit compared to manufacturer’s NAL-NL1 first-fit. Conclusion The optimized-fit yields better audibility and improved word recognition in quiet. This supports best practice guidelines of many professional organizations regarding the use of probe-microphone measurement as the “Gold standard” for verification of hearing aid fitting, thereby providing better satisfaction and quality of life to hearing aid users.
id SBFA-1_19234cdee273dc90cea64375c402410c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2317-17822022000100303
network_acronym_str SBFA-1
network_name_str CoDAS
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of performance with hearing aid programmed to NAL-NL1 first-fit and optimized-fitHearing AidNAL-NL1First-fitOptimized-fitProbe-microphone VerificationABSTRACT Purpose The initial-fit provided by the hearing aid manufacturer’s software is generally a display of measurement done in the ear simulators. The need for verification of hearing aid output and gain in the real ear using probe-microphone measurement to match the prescriptive target is highlighted. The objective of the study was to evaluate the difference in real-ear aided response (REAR), real-ear insertion gain (REIG), aided thresholds, articulation index (AI) and word recognition score (WRS) in quiet, with hearing aid programmed to NAL-NL1 first-fit and NAL-NL1 optimized-fit using the probe-microphone technique. Methods In a repeated measure experimental design, 11 participants with a mean age of 41.09 (SD=±9.95) years having moderate and moderately-severe sensorineural hearing loss were tested monaurally in two aided conditions, with a 16-channel hearing aid programmed for manufacturer’s NAL-NL1 first-fit and optimized-fit to NAL-NL1 using probe-microphone verification. The REAR, REIG, aided threshold, articulation index and word recognition scores in quiet were obtained for both aided conditions. Results The REAR, REIG, aided threshold, AI and WRS in quiet were significantly better with the NAL-NL1 optimized-fit compared to manufacturer’s NAL-NL1 first-fit. Conclusion The optimized-fit yields better audibility and improved word recognition in quiet. This supports best practice guidelines of many professional organizations regarding the use of probe-microphone measurement as the “Gold standard” for verification of hearing aid fitting, thereby providing better satisfaction and quality of life to hearing aid users.Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822022000100303CoDAS v.34 n.1 2022reponame:CoDASinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)instacron:SBFA10.1590/2317-1782/20212020310info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNarayanan,Sreena EdiyarathManjula,Puttabasappaeng2021-10-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2317-17822022000100303Revistahttps://www.codas.org.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcodas@editoracubo.com.br||revista@codas.org.br2317-17822317-1782opendoar:2021-10-15T00:00CoDAS - Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of performance with hearing aid programmed to NAL-NL1 first-fit and optimized-fit
title Comparison of performance with hearing aid programmed to NAL-NL1 first-fit and optimized-fit
spellingShingle Comparison of performance with hearing aid programmed to NAL-NL1 first-fit and optimized-fit
Narayanan,Sreena Ediyarath
Hearing Aid
NAL-NL1
First-fit
Optimized-fit
Probe-microphone Verification
title_short Comparison of performance with hearing aid programmed to NAL-NL1 first-fit and optimized-fit
title_full Comparison of performance with hearing aid programmed to NAL-NL1 first-fit and optimized-fit
title_fullStr Comparison of performance with hearing aid programmed to NAL-NL1 first-fit and optimized-fit
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of performance with hearing aid programmed to NAL-NL1 first-fit and optimized-fit
title_sort Comparison of performance with hearing aid programmed to NAL-NL1 first-fit and optimized-fit
author Narayanan,Sreena Ediyarath
author_facet Narayanan,Sreena Ediyarath
Manjula,Puttabasappa
author_role author
author2 Manjula,Puttabasappa
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Narayanan,Sreena Ediyarath
Manjula,Puttabasappa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hearing Aid
NAL-NL1
First-fit
Optimized-fit
Probe-microphone Verification
topic Hearing Aid
NAL-NL1
First-fit
Optimized-fit
Probe-microphone Verification
description ABSTRACT Purpose The initial-fit provided by the hearing aid manufacturer’s software is generally a display of measurement done in the ear simulators. The need for verification of hearing aid output and gain in the real ear using probe-microphone measurement to match the prescriptive target is highlighted. The objective of the study was to evaluate the difference in real-ear aided response (REAR), real-ear insertion gain (REIG), aided thresholds, articulation index (AI) and word recognition score (WRS) in quiet, with hearing aid programmed to NAL-NL1 first-fit and NAL-NL1 optimized-fit using the probe-microphone technique. Methods In a repeated measure experimental design, 11 participants with a mean age of 41.09 (SD=±9.95) years having moderate and moderately-severe sensorineural hearing loss were tested monaurally in two aided conditions, with a 16-channel hearing aid programmed for manufacturer’s NAL-NL1 first-fit and optimized-fit to NAL-NL1 using probe-microphone verification. The REAR, REIG, aided threshold, articulation index and word recognition scores in quiet were obtained for both aided conditions. Results The REAR, REIG, aided threshold, AI and WRS in quiet were significantly better with the NAL-NL1 optimized-fit compared to manufacturer’s NAL-NL1 first-fit. Conclusion The optimized-fit yields better audibility and improved word recognition in quiet. This supports best practice guidelines of many professional organizations regarding the use of probe-microphone measurement as the “Gold standard” for verification of hearing aid fitting, thereby providing better satisfaction and quality of life to hearing aid users.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822022000100303
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822022000100303
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2317-1782/20212020310
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv CoDAS v.34 n.1 2022
reponame:CoDAS
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)
instacron:SBFA
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)
instacron_str SBFA
institution SBFA
reponame_str CoDAS
collection CoDAS
repository.name.fl_str_mv CoDAS - Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv codas@editoracubo.com.br||revista@codas.org.br
_version_ 1752122443440324608