Histomorphometric bone assessment in patients with fracture of the proximal end of the femur

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza,Caio Gonçalves de
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Souza,Márcio Passini Gonçalves de, Jorgetti,Vanda, Reis,Luciene Machado dos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522015000200103
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is a difference on the bone architecture in patients with femoral neck fracture compared to patients with intertrochanteric fractures and assess the importance of aging on bone microarchitecture in patients with proximal femoral fracture.METHODS: Biopsy of the iliac crest was made in seventeen patients between 55 and 90 years old who were admitted to the emergency room with fractures of the proximal end of the femur. After a small fragment was removed, we made a histomorphometric analysis of it.RESULTS: There was no significant difference between patients with femoral neck fracture and trochanteric fracture in structural parameters, formation and resorption. Comparing age groups we also did not find any significant change between the groups in the parameters volume and trabecular separation.CONCLUSION: There are no difference in the morphometric parameters analyzed between the different types of fracture and age is not a significant factor in the alteration of these parameters.Level of Evidence II, Diagnostic Studies.
id SBOT-1_d02189e6d296c439b4d4f94f2a9e276a
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-78522015000200103
network_acronym_str SBOT-1
network_name_str Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Histomorphometric bone assessment in patients with fracture of the proximal end of the femurBone and bonesOsteoporosisHip fracturesOBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is a difference on the bone architecture in patients with femoral neck fracture compared to patients with intertrochanteric fractures and assess the importance of aging on bone microarchitecture in patients with proximal femoral fracture.METHODS: Biopsy of the iliac crest was made in seventeen patients between 55 and 90 years old who were admitted to the emergency room with fractures of the proximal end of the femur. After a small fragment was removed, we made a histomorphometric analysis of it.RESULTS: There was no significant difference between patients with femoral neck fracture and trochanteric fracture in structural parameters, formation and resorption. Comparing age groups we also did not find any significant change between the groups in the parameters volume and trabecular separation.CONCLUSION: There are no difference in the morphometric parameters analyzed between the different types of fracture and age is not a significant factor in the alteration of these parameters.Level of Evidence II, Diagnostic Studies.ATHA EDITORA2015-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522015000200103Acta Ortopédica Brasileira v.23 n.2 2015reponame:Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1590/1413-78522015230201056info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza,Caio Gonçalves deSouza,Márcio Passini Gonçalves deJorgetti,VandaReis,Luciene Machado doseng2015-10-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-78522015000200103Revistahttp://www.actaortopedica.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php1atha@uol.com.br||actaortopedicabrasileira@uol.com.br1809-44061413-7852opendoar:2015-10-27T00:00Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Histomorphometric bone assessment in patients with fracture of the proximal end of the femur
title Histomorphometric bone assessment in patients with fracture of the proximal end of the femur
spellingShingle Histomorphometric bone assessment in patients with fracture of the proximal end of the femur
Souza,Caio Gonçalves de
Bone and bones
Osteoporosis
Hip fractures
title_short Histomorphometric bone assessment in patients with fracture of the proximal end of the femur
title_full Histomorphometric bone assessment in patients with fracture of the proximal end of the femur
title_fullStr Histomorphometric bone assessment in patients with fracture of the proximal end of the femur
title_full_unstemmed Histomorphometric bone assessment in patients with fracture of the proximal end of the femur
title_sort Histomorphometric bone assessment in patients with fracture of the proximal end of the femur
author Souza,Caio Gonçalves de
author_facet Souza,Caio Gonçalves de
Souza,Márcio Passini Gonçalves de
Jorgetti,Vanda
Reis,Luciene Machado dos
author_role author
author2 Souza,Márcio Passini Gonçalves de
Jorgetti,Vanda
Reis,Luciene Machado dos
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza,Caio Gonçalves de
Souza,Márcio Passini Gonçalves de
Jorgetti,Vanda
Reis,Luciene Machado dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bone and bones
Osteoporosis
Hip fractures
topic Bone and bones
Osteoporosis
Hip fractures
description OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is a difference on the bone architecture in patients with femoral neck fracture compared to patients with intertrochanteric fractures and assess the importance of aging on bone microarchitecture in patients with proximal femoral fracture.METHODS: Biopsy of the iliac crest was made in seventeen patients between 55 and 90 years old who were admitted to the emergency room with fractures of the proximal end of the femur. After a small fragment was removed, we made a histomorphometric analysis of it.RESULTS: There was no significant difference between patients with femoral neck fracture and trochanteric fracture in structural parameters, formation and resorption. Comparing age groups we also did not find any significant change between the groups in the parameters volume and trabecular separation.CONCLUSION: There are no difference in the morphometric parameters analyzed between the different types of fracture and age is not a significant factor in the alteration of these parameters.Level of Evidence II, Diagnostic Studies.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522015000200103
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522015000200103
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1413-78522015230201056
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ATHA EDITORA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ATHA EDITORA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Ortopédica Brasileira v.23 n.2 2015
reponame:Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron:SBOT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron_str SBOT
institution SBOT
reponame_str Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
collection Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv 1atha@uol.com.br||actaortopedicabrasileira@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752122275137585152