Are diaphyseal clavicular fractures still treated traditionally in a non-surgical way?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000400410 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the decision of orthopedics surgeons regarding which cases they would indicate surgery or non-surgical treatment. METHODS: 20 images of radiographs with fracture in the middle third of the collar bone (AO/OTA 15-B) in anteroposterior view were analyzed, and divided into four groups: group 1 - fracture type AO/OTA 15-B1 without displacement; group 2 - fracture type AO/OTA 15-B1 with displacement; group 3 - fracture type AO/OTA 15-B2; group 4 - fracture type AO/OTA 15-B3. The evaluator was requested to indicate the choice of treatment, surgical or non-surgical. RESULTS: There was no strong correlation between the amount of surgical indications and the working experience or age of the medical evaluator. It was observed that the average of surgical indications in the total sample was 52%. When indications were studied in different areas of Brazil, there was no significant difference among them. No pattern for the Brazilian regions studied was observed in the case analysis. Even within a group (cases of the same complexity), no specific pattern of surgical indication was observed. CONCLUSION: No association between surgical indication and the length of professional experience was found. The Southern and Southeastern regions were those that most recommended surgeries in groups 2, 3, and 4. In no region the same level of surgical indication for cases of the same complexity rate was kept. |
id |
SBOT-2_a4a47f9572c41aea541772ee7102762b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-36162017000400410 |
network_acronym_str |
SBOT-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Are diaphyseal clavicular fractures still treated traditionally in a non-surgical way?Fractures, bone surgeryFractures, bone radiographyClavicule/surgeryClavicule/radiographyBone platesABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the decision of orthopedics surgeons regarding which cases they would indicate surgery or non-surgical treatment. METHODS: 20 images of radiographs with fracture in the middle third of the collar bone (AO/OTA 15-B) in anteroposterior view were analyzed, and divided into four groups: group 1 - fracture type AO/OTA 15-B1 without displacement; group 2 - fracture type AO/OTA 15-B1 with displacement; group 3 - fracture type AO/OTA 15-B2; group 4 - fracture type AO/OTA 15-B3. The evaluator was requested to indicate the choice of treatment, surgical or non-surgical. RESULTS: There was no strong correlation between the amount of surgical indications and the working experience or age of the medical evaluator. It was observed that the average of surgical indications in the total sample was 52%. When indications were studied in different areas of Brazil, there was no significant difference among them. No pattern for the Brazilian regions studied was observed in the case analysis. Even within a group (cases of the same complexity), no specific pattern of surgical indication was observed. CONCLUSION: No association between surgical indication and the length of professional experience was found. The Southern and Southeastern regions were those that most recommended surgeries in groups 2, 3, and 4. In no region the same level of surgical indication for cases of the same complexity rate was kept.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000400410Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.52 n.4 2017reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1016/j.rboe.2017.06.012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLabronici,Pedro JoséSantos Filho,Fernando Claudino dosReis,Tales BregaldaPires,Robinson Esteves SantosMendes Junior,Adriano FernandoKojima,Kodi Edsoneng2017-10-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162017000400410Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2017-10-03T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Are diaphyseal clavicular fractures still treated traditionally in a non-surgical way? |
title |
Are diaphyseal clavicular fractures still treated traditionally in a non-surgical way? |
spellingShingle |
Are diaphyseal clavicular fractures still treated traditionally in a non-surgical way? Labronici,Pedro José Fractures, bone surgery Fractures, bone radiography Clavicule/surgery Clavicule/radiography Bone plates |
title_short |
Are diaphyseal clavicular fractures still treated traditionally in a non-surgical way? |
title_full |
Are diaphyseal clavicular fractures still treated traditionally in a non-surgical way? |
title_fullStr |
Are diaphyseal clavicular fractures still treated traditionally in a non-surgical way? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are diaphyseal clavicular fractures still treated traditionally in a non-surgical way? |
title_sort |
Are diaphyseal clavicular fractures still treated traditionally in a non-surgical way? |
author |
Labronici,Pedro José |
author_facet |
Labronici,Pedro José Santos Filho,Fernando Claudino dos Reis,Tales Bregalda Pires,Robinson Esteves Santos Mendes Junior,Adriano Fernando Kojima,Kodi Edson |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santos Filho,Fernando Claudino dos Reis,Tales Bregalda Pires,Robinson Esteves Santos Mendes Junior,Adriano Fernando Kojima,Kodi Edson |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Labronici,Pedro José Santos Filho,Fernando Claudino dos Reis,Tales Bregalda Pires,Robinson Esteves Santos Mendes Junior,Adriano Fernando Kojima,Kodi Edson |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Fractures, bone surgery Fractures, bone radiography Clavicule/surgery Clavicule/radiography Bone plates |
topic |
Fractures, bone surgery Fractures, bone radiography Clavicule/surgery Clavicule/radiography Bone plates |
description |
ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the decision of orthopedics surgeons regarding which cases they would indicate surgery or non-surgical treatment. METHODS: 20 images of radiographs with fracture in the middle third of the collar bone (AO/OTA 15-B) in anteroposterior view were analyzed, and divided into four groups: group 1 - fracture type AO/OTA 15-B1 without displacement; group 2 - fracture type AO/OTA 15-B1 with displacement; group 3 - fracture type AO/OTA 15-B2; group 4 - fracture type AO/OTA 15-B3. The evaluator was requested to indicate the choice of treatment, surgical or non-surgical. RESULTS: There was no strong correlation between the amount of surgical indications and the working experience or age of the medical evaluator. It was observed that the average of surgical indications in the total sample was 52%. When indications were studied in different areas of Brazil, there was no significant difference among them. No pattern for the Brazilian regions studied was observed in the case analysis. Even within a group (cases of the same complexity), no specific pattern of surgical indication was observed. CONCLUSION: No association between surgical indication and the length of professional experience was found. The Southern and Southeastern regions were those that most recommended surgeries in groups 2, 3, and 4. In no region the same level of surgical indication for cases of the same complexity rate was kept. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000400410 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000400410 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.rboe.2017.06.012 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.52 n.4 2017 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) instacron:SBOT |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
instacron_str |
SBOT |
institution |
SBOT |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbo@sbot.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122360886984704 |