Appreciation in Relationships (AIR) Scale: Preliminary Evidence of Validity and Accuracy in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Trends in Psychology |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-18832019000400851 |
Resumo: | Abstract This study aimed to adapt the Appreciation in Relationships (AIR) scale for the Brazilian context and to seek evidence of validity and accuracy, based on evidence of construct validity (i.e. factor analysis and internal consistency). The sample consisted of 233 people in amorous relationships from 15 Brazilian states, over 18 years of age. The majority were women (52.4%), even though a population with a homogeneous composition was sought to respond to the instruments: AIR and Sociodemographic Questionnaire. Through Structural Equation Modeling, with Confirmatory Factor Analysis, the theory regarding the existence of two factors was confirmed. The two-factor model presented the following fit indices: χ2 / df = 2.70, CFI = 0.97, TLI = 0.96, RMSEA (90%CI) = 0.08 (0.07-0.10). It was concluded that the AIR presents acceptable evidence regarding the psychometric parameters in the context, and can be used in further studies on appreciation in relationships. |
id |
SBP-2_7732f8f050ac0a6e1cffc3c4ac69c0ed |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2358-18832019000400851 |
network_acronym_str |
SBP-2 |
network_name_str |
Trends in Psychology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Appreciation in Relationships (AIR) Scale: Preliminary Evidence of Validity and Accuracy in BrazilAppreciationrelationshipvalidationAbstract This study aimed to adapt the Appreciation in Relationships (AIR) scale for the Brazilian context and to seek evidence of validity and accuracy, based on evidence of construct validity (i.e. factor analysis and internal consistency). The sample consisted of 233 people in amorous relationships from 15 Brazilian states, over 18 years of age. The majority were women (52.4%), even though a population with a homogeneous composition was sought to respond to the instruments: AIR and Sociodemographic Questionnaire. Through Structural Equation Modeling, with Confirmatory Factor Analysis, the theory regarding the existence of two factors was confirmed. The two-factor model presented the following fit indices: χ2 / df = 2.70, CFI = 0.97, TLI = 0.96, RMSEA (90%CI) = 0.08 (0.07-0.10). It was concluded that the AIR presents acceptable evidence regarding the psychometric parameters in the context, and can be used in further studies on appreciation in relationships.Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia2019-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-18832019000400851Trends in Psychology v.27 n.4 2019reponame:Trends in Psychologyinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia (SBP)instacron:SBP10.9788/tp2019.4-03info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMedeiros,Emerson Diógenes deFreire,Sandra Elisa de AssisPortela,Ariane Viana MartinsBrito,Rislay Carolinne Silvaeng2019-11-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2358-18832019000400851Revistahttp://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1413-389XONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||comissaoeditorial@sbponline.org.br2358-18832358-1883opendoar:2019-11-26T00:00Trends in Psychology - Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia (SBP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Appreciation in Relationships (AIR) Scale: Preliminary Evidence of Validity and Accuracy in Brazil |
title |
Appreciation in Relationships (AIR) Scale: Preliminary Evidence of Validity and Accuracy in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Appreciation in Relationships (AIR) Scale: Preliminary Evidence of Validity and Accuracy in Brazil Medeiros,Emerson Diógenes de Appreciation relationship validation |
title_short |
Appreciation in Relationships (AIR) Scale: Preliminary Evidence of Validity and Accuracy in Brazil |
title_full |
Appreciation in Relationships (AIR) Scale: Preliminary Evidence of Validity and Accuracy in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Appreciation in Relationships (AIR) Scale: Preliminary Evidence of Validity and Accuracy in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Appreciation in Relationships (AIR) Scale: Preliminary Evidence of Validity and Accuracy in Brazil |
title_sort |
Appreciation in Relationships (AIR) Scale: Preliminary Evidence of Validity and Accuracy in Brazil |
author |
Medeiros,Emerson Diógenes de |
author_facet |
Medeiros,Emerson Diógenes de Freire,Sandra Elisa de Assis Portela,Ariane Viana Martins Brito,Rislay Carolinne Silva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Freire,Sandra Elisa de Assis Portela,Ariane Viana Martins Brito,Rislay Carolinne Silva |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Medeiros,Emerson Diógenes de Freire,Sandra Elisa de Assis Portela,Ariane Viana Martins Brito,Rislay Carolinne Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Appreciation relationship validation |
topic |
Appreciation relationship validation |
description |
Abstract This study aimed to adapt the Appreciation in Relationships (AIR) scale for the Brazilian context and to seek evidence of validity and accuracy, based on evidence of construct validity (i.e. factor analysis and internal consistency). The sample consisted of 233 people in amorous relationships from 15 Brazilian states, over 18 years of age. The majority were women (52.4%), even though a population with a homogeneous composition was sought to respond to the instruments: AIR and Sociodemographic Questionnaire. Through Structural Equation Modeling, with Confirmatory Factor Analysis, the theory regarding the existence of two factors was confirmed. The two-factor model presented the following fit indices: χ2 / df = 2.70, CFI = 0.97, TLI = 0.96, RMSEA (90%CI) = 0.08 (0.07-0.10). It was concluded that the AIR presents acceptable evidence regarding the psychometric parameters in the context, and can be used in further studies on appreciation in relationships. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-18832019000400851 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-18832019000400851 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.9788/tp2019.4-03 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Trends in Psychology v.27 n.4 2019 reponame:Trends in Psychology instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia (SBP) instacron:SBP |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia (SBP) |
instacron_str |
SBP |
institution |
SBP |
reponame_str |
Trends in Psychology |
collection |
Trends in Psychology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Trends in Psychology - Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia (SBP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||comissaoeditorial@sbponline.org.br |
_version_ |
1754734764395331584 |