Multiple-peak and single-peak dental curing lights comparison on the wear resistance of bulk-fill composites

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sahadi,Beatriz Ometto
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Price,Richard Bengt, André,Carolina Bosso, Sebold,Maicon, Bermejo,Gabriel Nima, Palma-Dibb,Regina Guenka, Faraoni,Juliana Jendiroba, Soares,Carlos José, Giannini,Marcelo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100300
Resumo: Abstract: The effects of tooth brushing could affect the long-term esthetic outcome of composite restorations. This study evaluated the effect of two different emission spectrum light-curing units on the surface roughness, roughness profile, topography and microhardness of bulk-fill composites after in vitro toothbrushing. Valo (multiple-peak) and Demi Ultra (single-peak) curing lights were each used for 10s to polymerize three bulk-fill resin composites: Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative (FBF), Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (TET) and Surefil SDR Flow (SDR). After 30,000 reciprocal strokes in a toothbrushing machine, the roughness profile, surface roughness, surface morphology, and microhardness were examined. Representative SEM images were also obtained. When light-cured with the Demi Ultra, SDR showed the most loss in volume compared to the other composites and higher volume loss compared to when was light-cured with Valo. The highest surface roughness and roughness profile values were found in SDR after toothbrushing, for both light-curing units tested. FBF always had the greatest microhardness values. Light-curing TET with Valo resulted in higher microhardness compared to when using the Demi Ultra. Confocal and SEM images show that toothbrushing resulted in smoother surfaces for FBF and TET. All composites exhibited surface volume loss after toothbrushing. The loss in volume of SDR depended on the light-curing unit used. Toothbrushing can alter the surface roughness and superficial aspect of some bulk-fill composites. The choice of light-curing unit did not affect the roughness profile, but, depending on the composite, it affected the microhardness.
id SBPQO-1_7632a3d9975e06320ec7dd00e0803d8c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242018000100300
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling Multiple-peak and single-peak dental curing lights comparison on the wear resistance of bulk-fill compositesComposite ResinsToothbrushingPolymerizationAbstract: The effects of tooth brushing could affect the long-term esthetic outcome of composite restorations. This study evaluated the effect of two different emission spectrum light-curing units on the surface roughness, roughness profile, topography and microhardness of bulk-fill composites after in vitro toothbrushing. Valo (multiple-peak) and Demi Ultra (single-peak) curing lights were each used for 10s to polymerize three bulk-fill resin composites: Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative (FBF), Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (TET) and Surefil SDR Flow (SDR). After 30,000 reciprocal strokes in a toothbrushing machine, the roughness profile, surface roughness, surface morphology, and microhardness were examined. Representative SEM images were also obtained. When light-cured with the Demi Ultra, SDR showed the most loss in volume compared to the other composites and higher volume loss compared to when was light-cured with Valo. The highest surface roughness and roughness profile values were found in SDR after toothbrushing, for both light-curing units tested. FBF always had the greatest microhardness values. Light-curing TET with Valo resulted in higher microhardness compared to when using the Demi Ultra. Confocal and SEM images show that toothbrushing resulted in smoother surfaces for FBF and TET. All composites exhibited surface volume loss after toothbrushing. The loss in volume of SDR depended on the light-curing unit used. Toothbrushing can alter the surface roughness and superficial aspect of some bulk-fill composites. The choice of light-curing unit did not affect the roughness profile, but, depending on the composite, it affected the microhardness.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100300Brazilian Oral Research v.32 2018reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0122info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSahadi,Beatriz OmettoPrice,Richard BengtAndré,Carolina BossoSebold,MaiconBermejo,Gabriel NimaPalma-Dibb,Regina GuenkaFaraoni,Juliana JendirobaSoares,Carlos JoséGiannini,Marceloeng2018-12-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242018000100300Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2018-12-12T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Multiple-peak and single-peak dental curing lights comparison on the wear resistance of bulk-fill composites
title Multiple-peak and single-peak dental curing lights comparison on the wear resistance of bulk-fill composites
spellingShingle Multiple-peak and single-peak dental curing lights comparison on the wear resistance of bulk-fill composites
Sahadi,Beatriz Ometto
Composite Resins
Toothbrushing
Polymerization
title_short Multiple-peak and single-peak dental curing lights comparison on the wear resistance of bulk-fill composites
title_full Multiple-peak and single-peak dental curing lights comparison on the wear resistance of bulk-fill composites
title_fullStr Multiple-peak and single-peak dental curing lights comparison on the wear resistance of bulk-fill composites
title_full_unstemmed Multiple-peak and single-peak dental curing lights comparison on the wear resistance of bulk-fill composites
title_sort Multiple-peak and single-peak dental curing lights comparison on the wear resistance of bulk-fill composites
author Sahadi,Beatriz Ometto
author_facet Sahadi,Beatriz Ometto
Price,Richard Bengt
André,Carolina Bosso
Sebold,Maicon
Bermejo,Gabriel Nima
Palma-Dibb,Regina Guenka
Faraoni,Juliana Jendiroba
Soares,Carlos José
Giannini,Marcelo
author_role author
author2 Price,Richard Bengt
André,Carolina Bosso
Sebold,Maicon
Bermejo,Gabriel Nima
Palma-Dibb,Regina Guenka
Faraoni,Juliana Jendiroba
Soares,Carlos José
Giannini,Marcelo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sahadi,Beatriz Ometto
Price,Richard Bengt
André,Carolina Bosso
Sebold,Maicon
Bermejo,Gabriel Nima
Palma-Dibb,Regina Guenka
Faraoni,Juliana Jendiroba
Soares,Carlos José
Giannini,Marcelo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Composite Resins
Toothbrushing
Polymerization
topic Composite Resins
Toothbrushing
Polymerization
description Abstract: The effects of tooth brushing could affect the long-term esthetic outcome of composite restorations. This study evaluated the effect of two different emission spectrum light-curing units on the surface roughness, roughness profile, topography and microhardness of bulk-fill composites after in vitro toothbrushing. Valo (multiple-peak) and Demi Ultra (single-peak) curing lights were each used for 10s to polymerize three bulk-fill resin composites: Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative (FBF), Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (TET) and Surefil SDR Flow (SDR). After 30,000 reciprocal strokes in a toothbrushing machine, the roughness profile, surface roughness, surface morphology, and microhardness were examined. Representative SEM images were also obtained. When light-cured with the Demi Ultra, SDR showed the most loss in volume compared to the other composites and higher volume loss compared to when was light-cured with Valo. The highest surface roughness and roughness profile values were found in SDR after toothbrushing, for both light-curing units tested. FBF always had the greatest microhardness values. Light-curing TET with Valo resulted in higher microhardness compared to when using the Demi Ultra. Confocal and SEM images show that toothbrushing resulted in smoother surfaces for FBF and TET. All composites exhibited surface volume loss after toothbrushing. The loss in volume of SDR depended on the light-curing unit used. Toothbrushing can alter the surface roughness and superficial aspect of some bulk-fill composites. The choice of light-curing unit did not affect the roughness profile, but, depending on the composite, it affected the microhardness.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100300
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100300
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0122
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.32 2018
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318326154788864