The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Natalia,Sumerova
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Menahem,Neuman, Haim,Krissi, Dmitri,Pushkar
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000300507
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objectives To evaluate the feasibility, safety and surgical results of skeletonized mesh implants to form a pelvic harness for pelvic floor reconstruction surgery. Study design Patients with advanced pelvic floor prolapse were enrolled to this study. Study model was a kit mesh, reduced to 75% of the original surface area by cutting out mesh material from the central mesh body. Patients were evaluated at the end of the 1st and 6th post-operative months and interviewed at the study conclusion. Results Ninety-five women with advanced pelvic floor prolapse had this implant. Mean follow-up duration was 9 months (6-12 months). The POP-Q point’s measurements showed marked and statistically significant improvements. Bladder over-activity symptoms, fecal incontinence, pelvic pain and constipation rates were all reduced as well. No adverse effects related to the dissection or mesh implantation were marked. The first and sixth post-operative month follow-up records as well as the study conclusion interview findings were satisfactory in terms of subjective and objective cure and adverse effects occurrence. Conclusion This study data proposes that skeletonizing meshes might be safely and successfully implanted for potentially improved pelvic floor reconstruction.
id SBU-1_ca98e4efa73b707e212c98339c23e1bf
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382016000300507
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstructionReconstructive Surgical ProceduresGeneral SurgeryPelvic Floor DisordersABSTRACT Objectives To evaluate the feasibility, safety and surgical results of skeletonized mesh implants to form a pelvic harness for pelvic floor reconstruction surgery. Study design Patients with advanced pelvic floor prolapse were enrolled to this study. Study model was a kit mesh, reduced to 75% of the original surface area by cutting out mesh material from the central mesh body. Patients were evaluated at the end of the 1st and 6th post-operative months and interviewed at the study conclusion. Results Ninety-five women with advanced pelvic floor prolapse had this implant. Mean follow-up duration was 9 months (6-12 months). The POP-Q point’s measurements showed marked and statistically significant improvements. Bladder over-activity symptoms, fecal incontinence, pelvic pain and constipation rates were all reduced as well. No adverse effects related to the dissection or mesh implantation were marked. The first and sixth post-operative month follow-up records as well as the study conclusion interview findings were satisfactory in terms of subjective and objective cure and adverse effects occurrence. Conclusion This study data proposes that skeletonizing meshes might be safely and successfully implanted for potentially improved pelvic floor reconstruction.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2016-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000300507International braz j urol v.42 n.3 2016reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0177info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNatalia,SumerovaMenahem,NeumanHaim,KrissiDmitri,Pushkareng2016-06-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382016000300507Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2016-06-28T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
title The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
spellingShingle The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
Natalia,Sumerova
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
General Surgery
Pelvic Floor Disorders
title_short The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
title_full The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
title_fullStr The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
title_sort The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
author Natalia,Sumerova
author_facet Natalia,Sumerova
Menahem,Neuman
Haim,Krissi
Dmitri,Pushkar
author_role author
author2 Menahem,Neuman
Haim,Krissi
Dmitri,Pushkar
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Natalia,Sumerova
Menahem,Neuman
Haim,Krissi
Dmitri,Pushkar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
General Surgery
Pelvic Floor Disorders
topic Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
General Surgery
Pelvic Floor Disorders
description ABSTRACT Objectives To evaluate the feasibility, safety and surgical results of skeletonized mesh implants to form a pelvic harness for pelvic floor reconstruction surgery. Study design Patients with advanced pelvic floor prolapse were enrolled to this study. Study model was a kit mesh, reduced to 75% of the original surface area by cutting out mesh material from the central mesh body. Patients were evaluated at the end of the 1st and 6th post-operative months and interviewed at the study conclusion. Results Ninety-five women with advanced pelvic floor prolapse had this implant. Mean follow-up duration was 9 months (6-12 months). The POP-Q point’s measurements showed marked and statistically significant improvements. Bladder over-activity symptoms, fecal incontinence, pelvic pain and constipation rates were all reduced as well. No adverse effects related to the dissection or mesh implantation were marked. The first and sixth post-operative month follow-up records as well as the study conclusion interview findings were satisfactory in terms of subjective and objective cure and adverse effects occurrence. Conclusion This study data proposes that skeletonizing meshes might be safely and successfully implanted for potentially improved pelvic floor reconstruction.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000300507
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000300507
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0177
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.42 n.3 2016
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318074931707904