As Teorias Rivais sobre a Propriedade Intelectual no Brasil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng spa |
Título da fonte: | Economic Analysis of law Review |
Texto Completo: | https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/1464 |
Resumo: | The present essay analyzes the state-of-the-art in the debate concerning the interactions between intellectual property, innovation and economic development. On one hand, the treatment conferred to the theme by the Law & Economics approach is exposed, taking as premises the Schumpeterian theory of creative destruction, as well as Douglass North’s neo-institutional theory. Accordingly, a faulty intellectual property protection is considered a tragedy of the commons. On the other hand, the theory supporting that the consequence of the current protection provided by intellectual property and its exclusionary rights is actually a tragedy of anticommons. It is also described here the social function of property theory (so vigorous in Brazil) that considers intellectual property as a form of property that should be devoted to satisfy a social function. Finally, a Brazilian innovation database and some implications in the country about the importance given by the government and society to intellectual property are analyzed. |
id |
UCB-6_2ba889376f8b1d98fa8e7f49ca639808 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.portalrevistas.ucb.br:article/1464 |
network_acronym_str |
UCB-6 |
network_name_str |
Economic Analysis of law Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
As Teorias Rivais sobre a Propriedade Intelectual no BrasilAs Teorias Rivais sobre a Propriedade Intelectual no Brasil DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18836/2178-0587/ealr.v1n1p49-77Law & Economics Intellectual Property Innovation Tragedy of Commons Tragedy of Anticommons Social FunctionLaw & Economics Propriedade Intelectual Inovação Tragédia dos Baldios Tragédia dos Anti-Baldios Função SocialThe present essay analyzes the state-of-the-art in the debate concerning the interactions between intellectual property, innovation and economic development. On one hand, the treatment conferred to the theme by the Law & Economics approach is exposed, taking as premises the Schumpeterian theory of creative destruction, as well as Douglass North’s neo-institutional theory. Accordingly, a faulty intellectual property protection is considered a tragedy of the commons. On the other hand, the theory supporting that the consequence of the current protection provided by intellectual property and its exclusionary rights is actually a tragedy of anticommons. It is also described here the social function of property theory (so vigorous in Brazil) that considers intellectual property as a form of property that should be devoted to satisfy a social function. Finally, a Brazilian innovation database and some implications in the country about the importance given by the government and society to intellectual property are analyzed.O objeto do presente ensaio é a constatação do debate existente acerca da relação entre propriedade intelectual e promoção de inovações e de desenvolvimento econômico, por meio da exposição de teorias rivais. De um lado, expõe-se a abordagem AED sobre o tema e adota-se por premissa a teoria schumpeteriana de desenvolvimento, bem como a teoria de Douglass North, que expressa instituições, formais e informais, como estruturas de incentivos aos agentes econômicos capazes de punir (custo) ou premiar (benefício) o desenvolvimento de inovações; ainda, ressalta-se a conseqüência da não-proteção das inovações como uma tragédia dos baldios. De outro lado, expõe-se a teoria que indica como resultado da proteção conferida pela propriedade intelectual como uma tragédia dos anti-baldios, capaz de não trazer benefício à promoção de inovações nem ao desenvolvimento econômico de uma nação. Descreve-se ainda a posição da doutrina brasileira que exalta a função social da propriedade como elemento de legitimação da propriedade. Por fim, analisam-se as implicações e dados brasileiros referentes ao tratamento conferido à inovação.Universidade Católica de Brasília2010-06-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Pares; Peer ReviewedTeóricoapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/146410.18836/2178-0587/ealr.v1n1p49-77Economic Analysis of Law Review; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2010): EALR's First Issue.; 49-77Economic Analysis of Law Review ; Vol. 1 Núm. 1 (2010): EALR's First Issue.; 49-77Economic Analysis of Law Review; v. 1 n. 1 (2010): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 49-772178-0587reponame:Economic Analysis of law Reviewinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBporengspahttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/1464/1113https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/1464/1920https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/1464/1921Timm, Luciano BenettiCaovilla, Renatoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-06-24T16:38:03Zoai:ojs.portalrevistas.ucb.br:article/1464Revistahttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/ealrONGhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/oaieditor.ealr@gmail.com||sdi@ucb.br||benjaminm.tabak@gmail.com2178-05872178-0587opendoar:2022-06-24T16:38:03Economic Analysis of law Review - Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
As Teorias Rivais sobre a Propriedade Intelectual no Brasil As Teorias Rivais sobre a Propriedade Intelectual no Brasil DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18836/2178-0587/ealr.v1n1p49-77 |
title |
As Teorias Rivais sobre a Propriedade Intelectual no Brasil |
spellingShingle |
As Teorias Rivais sobre a Propriedade Intelectual no Brasil Timm, Luciano Benetti Law & Economics Intellectual Property Innovation Tragedy of Commons Tragedy of Anticommons Social Function Law & Economics Propriedade Intelectual Inovação Tragédia dos Baldios Tragédia dos Anti-Baldios Função Social |
title_short |
As Teorias Rivais sobre a Propriedade Intelectual no Brasil |
title_full |
As Teorias Rivais sobre a Propriedade Intelectual no Brasil |
title_fullStr |
As Teorias Rivais sobre a Propriedade Intelectual no Brasil |
title_full_unstemmed |
As Teorias Rivais sobre a Propriedade Intelectual no Brasil |
title_sort |
As Teorias Rivais sobre a Propriedade Intelectual no Brasil |
author |
Timm, Luciano Benetti |
author_facet |
Timm, Luciano Benetti Caovilla, Renato |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Caovilla, Renato |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Timm, Luciano Benetti Caovilla, Renato |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Law & Economics Intellectual Property Innovation Tragedy of Commons Tragedy of Anticommons Social Function Law & Economics Propriedade Intelectual Inovação Tragédia dos Baldios Tragédia dos Anti-Baldios Função Social |
topic |
Law & Economics Intellectual Property Innovation Tragedy of Commons Tragedy of Anticommons Social Function Law & Economics Propriedade Intelectual Inovação Tragédia dos Baldios Tragédia dos Anti-Baldios Função Social |
description |
The present essay analyzes the state-of-the-art in the debate concerning the interactions between intellectual property, innovation and economic development. On one hand, the treatment conferred to the theme by the Law & Economics approach is exposed, taking as premises the Schumpeterian theory of creative destruction, as well as Douglass North’s neo-institutional theory. Accordingly, a faulty intellectual property protection is considered a tragedy of the commons. On the other hand, the theory supporting that the consequence of the current protection provided by intellectual property and its exclusionary rights is actually a tragedy of anticommons. It is also described here the social function of property theory (so vigorous in Brazil) that considers intellectual property as a form of property that should be devoted to satisfy a social function. Finally, a Brazilian innovation database and some implications in the country about the importance given by the government and society to intellectual property are analyzed. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-06-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares; Peer Reviewed Teórico |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/1464 10.18836/2178-0587/ealr.v1n1p49-77 |
url |
https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/1464 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18836/2178-0587/ealr.v1n1p49-77 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng spa |
language |
por eng spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/1464/1113 https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/1464/1920 https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/1464/1921 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica de Brasília |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica de Brasília |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Economic Analysis of Law Review; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2010): EALR's First Issue.; 49-77 Economic Analysis of Law Review ; Vol. 1 Núm. 1 (2010): EALR's First Issue.; 49-77 Economic Analysis of Law Review; v. 1 n. 1 (2010): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 49-77 2178-0587 reponame:Economic Analysis of law Review instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) instacron:UCB |
instname_str |
Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) |
instacron_str |
UCB |
institution |
UCB |
reponame_str |
Economic Analysis of law Review |
collection |
Economic Analysis of law Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Economic Analysis of law Review - Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editor.ealr@gmail.com||sdi@ucb.br||benjaminm.tabak@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798675422370594816 |