Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Almeida, Jane de Oliveira Rabelo de
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
Texto Completo: https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2215
Resumo: The objective of this study is to verify that the main issues may involve the social acceptance of the right to the implementation of ortotanasia in the context of the transformations brought about by the evolution of technology, Bioethics and, consequently, Law. It is a current theme, complex in itself, therefore involving the view of diverse disciplines, such as Biology, Philosophy and Sociology, which are represented in their constituent elements, such as common sense, science and culture, respectively. Religion stands out in this context, because the subject has the object of death and the treatment given to it. Theoretically, it was tried to characterize the evolution of the law in front of the social development resulting from the technological transformations and the emergence of Bioethics; analyzing ortotanasia in the context of the unfolding of the terminality of life; highlighting cultural aspects that can mobilize popular acceptance of controversial issues in general and ortotanasia in particular (common sense, science); to raise, among law students, objective and subjective aspects that may justify the non-undertaking of the artificial prolongation of life in terminal patients by the physician. Empirically, the results showed that there is still a lot of ignorance on the subject, which hinders or prevents answers that clearly point out the main difficulties of the social acceptance of ortotanasia. However, the tendency to recognize the right to refuse to therapeutic obstinacy was clear, which in itself already represents an advance against traditional culture.
id UCB_bbdaf148f1e26c9abae1cc1f3d7c7a96
oai_identifier_str oai:bdtd.ucb.br:tede/2215
network_acronym_str UCB
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
spelling Ribeiro, Diaulas Costahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8452624048767920http://lattes.cnpq.br/7298632829733429Almeida, Jane de Oliveira Rabelo de2017-08-10T17:35:06Z2017-05-05ALMEIDA, Jane de Oliveira Rabelo de. Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia. 2017. 135 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2017.https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2215The objective of this study is to verify that the main issues may involve the social acceptance of the right to the implementation of ortotanasia in the context of the transformations brought about by the evolution of technology, Bioethics and, consequently, Law. It is a current theme, complex in itself, therefore involving the view of diverse disciplines, such as Biology, Philosophy and Sociology, which are represented in their constituent elements, such as common sense, science and culture, respectively. Religion stands out in this context, because the subject has the object of death and the treatment given to it. Theoretically, it was tried to characterize the evolution of the law in front of the social development resulting from the technological transformations and the emergence of Bioethics; analyzing ortotanasia in the context of the unfolding of the terminality of life; highlighting cultural aspects that can mobilize popular acceptance of controversial issues in general and ortotanasia in particular (common sense, science); to raise, among law students, objective and subjective aspects that may justify the non-undertaking of the artificial prolongation of life in terminal patients by the physician. Empirically, the results showed that there is still a lot of ignorance on the subject, which hinders or prevents answers that clearly point out the main difficulties of the social acceptance of ortotanasia. However, the tendency to recognize the right to refuse to therapeutic obstinacy was clear, which in itself already represents an advance against traditional culture.O objetivo deste trabalho ?? verificar que principais quest??es podem envolver a aceita????o social do direito ?? implementa????o da ortotan??sia no contexto das transforma????es trazidas pela evolu????o da tecnologia, da Bio??tica e, consequentemente, do Direito. Trata-se de um tema atual, complexo em si, por isso mesmo envolvendo o olhar de disciplinas diversas, como o Biodireito, a Filosofia e a Sociologia, essas representadas em seus elementos constituintes, como senso comum, ci??ncia e cultura, respectivamente. A religi??o se destaca nesse contexto, pelo fato de o tema ter como objeto a morte e o tratamento dado a ela. Teoricamente, buscou-se caracterizar a evolu????o do Direito frente ao desenvolvimento social resultante das transforma????es tecnol??gicas e do surgimento da Bio??tica; analisar a ortotan??sia no contexto dos desdobramentos da terminalidade da vida; destacar aspectos culturais que podem mobilizar a aceita????o popular de quest??es pol??micas em geral e da ortotan??sia em particular (senso comum, ci??ncia); levantar, entre estudantes de Direito, aspectos objetivos e subjetivos que podem justificar o n??o empreendimento do prolongamento artificial da vida em pacientes terminais pelo m??dico. Empiricamente, os resultados demonstraram que ainda h?? muito desconhecimento sobre o assunto, o que dificulta ou impede respostas que claramente apontem as principais dificuldades da aceita????o social da ortotan??sia. Por??m, ficou clara a tend??ncia ao reconhecimento do direito de recusa ?? obstina????o terap??utica o que, em si, j?? representa um avan??o frente ?? cultura tradicional.Submitted by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2017-08-10T17:34:49Z No. of bitstreams: 1 JanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf: 1758339 bytes, checksum: 3e9677fa5ca1963932cfd2cf81d5d806 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2017-08-10T17:35:06Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 JanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf: 1758339 bytes, checksum: 3e9677fa5ca1963932cfd2cf81d5d806 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-10T17:35:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 JanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf: 1758339 bytes, checksum: 3e9677fa5ca1963932cfd2cf81d5d806 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-05-05application/pdfhttps://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/retrieve/4899/JanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Cat??lica de Bras??liaPrograma Strictu Sensu em DireitoUCBBrasilEscola de Humanidade e DireitoDireitoBio??ticaBiodireitoOrtotan??siaSenso comumCi??nciaCulturaCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITODilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??siainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCBinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82122https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2215/1/license.txt302d2cd6169132532f8ce4ab3974cba3MD51ORIGINALJanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdfJanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdfapplication/pdf1758339https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2215/2/JanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf3e9677fa5ca1963932cfd2cf81d5d806MD52TEXTJanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf.txtJanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf.txttext/plain305809https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2215/3/JanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf.txt1b6ebb77cb4a83f4228ba45426fe6e7dMD53THUMBNAILJanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf.jpgJanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5099https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2215/4/JanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf.jpg8108ebd59ebeb0ee39e71c5a10b3ff82MD54tede/22152019-09-19 09:18:12.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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia
title Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia
spellingShingle Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia
Almeida, Jane de Oliveira Rabelo de
Direito
Bio??tica
Biodireito
Ortotan??sia
Senso comum
Ci??ncia
Cultura
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
title_short Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia
title_full Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia
title_fullStr Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia
title_full_unstemmed Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia
title_sort Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia
author Almeida, Jane de Oliveira Rabelo de
author_facet Almeida, Jane de Oliveira Rabelo de
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Diaulas Costa
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8452624048767920
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/7298632829733429
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Almeida, Jane de Oliveira Rabelo de
contributor_str_mv Ribeiro, Diaulas Costa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Direito
Bio??tica
Biodireito
Ortotan??sia
Senso comum
Ci??ncia
Cultura
topic Direito
Bio??tica
Biodireito
Ortotan??sia
Senso comum
Ci??ncia
Cultura
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
dc.description.abstract.eng.fl_txt_mv The objective of this study is to verify that the main issues may involve the social acceptance of the right to the implementation of ortotanasia in the context of the transformations brought about by the evolution of technology, Bioethics and, consequently, Law. It is a current theme, complex in itself, therefore involving the view of diverse disciplines, such as Biology, Philosophy and Sociology, which are represented in their constituent elements, such as common sense, science and culture, respectively. Religion stands out in this context, because the subject has the object of death and the treatment given to it. Theoretically, it was tried to characterize the evolution of the law in front of the social development resulting from the technological transformations and the emergence of Bioethics; analyzing ortotanasia in the context of the unfolding of the terminality of life; highlighting cultural aspects that can mobilize popular acceptance of controversial issues in general and ortotanasia in particular (common sense, science); to raise, among law students, objective and subjective aspects that may justify the non-undertaking of the artificial prolongation of life in terminal patients by the physician. Empirically, the results showed that there is still a lot of ignorance on the subject, which hinders or prevents answers that clearly point out the main difficulties of the social acceptance of ortotanasia. However, the tendency to recognize the right to refuse to therapeutic obstinacy was clear, which in itself already represents an advance against traditional culture.
dc.description.abstract.por.fl_txt_mv O objetivo deste trabalho ?? verificar que principais quest??es podem envolver a aceita????o social do direito ?? implementa????o da ortotan??sia no contexto das transforma????es trazidas pela evolu????o da tecnologia, da Bio??tica e, consequentemente, do Direito. Trata-se de um tema atual, complexo em si, por isso mesmo envolvendo o olhar de disciplinas diversas, como o Biodireito, a Filosofia e a Sociologia, essas representadas em seus elementos constituintes, como senso comum, ci??ncia e cultura, respectivamente. A religi??o se destaca nesse contexto, pelo fato de o tema ter como objeto a morte e o tratamento dado a ela. Teoricamente, buscou-se caracterizar a evolu????o do Direito frente ao desenvolvimento social resultante das transforma????es tecnol??gicas e do surgimento da Bio??tica; analisar a ortotan??sia no contexto dos desdobramentos da terminalidade da vida; destacar aspectos culturais que podem mobilizar a aceita????o popular de quest??es pol??micas em geral e da ortotan??sia em particular (senso comum, ci??ncia); levantar, entre estudantes de Direito, aspectos objetivos e subjetivos que podem justificar o n??o empreendimento do prolongamento artificial da vida em pacientes terminais pelo m??dico. Empiricamente, os resultados demonstraram que ainda h?? muito desconhecimento sobre o assunto, o que dificulta ou impede respostas que claramente apontem as principais dificuldades da aceita????o social da ortotan??sia. Por??m, ficou clara a tend??ncia ao reconhecimento do direito de recusa ?? obstina????o terap??utica o que, em si, j?? representa um avan??o frente ?? cultura tradicional.
description The objective of this study is to verify that the main issues may involve the social acceptance of the right to the implementation of ortotanasia in the context of the transformations brought about by the evolution of technology, Bioethics and, consequently, Law. It is a current theme, complex in itself, therefore involving the view of diverse disciplines, such as Biology, Philosophy and Sociology, which are represented in their constituent elements, such as common sense, science and culture, respectively. Religion stands out in this context, because the subject has the object of death and the treatment given to it. Theoretically, it was tried to characterize the evolution of the law in front of the social development resulting from the technological transformations and the emergence of Bioethics; analyzing ortotanasia in the context of the unfolding of the terminality of life; highlighting cultural aspects that can mobilize popular acceptance of controversial issues in general and ortotanasia in particular (common sense, science); to raise, among law students, objective and subjective aspects that may justify the non-undertaking of the artificial prolongation of life in terminal patients by the physician. Empirically, the results showed that there is still a lot of ignorance on the subject, which hinders or prevents answers that clearly point out the main difficulties of the social acceptance of ortotanasia. However, the tendency to recognize the right to refuse to therapeutic obstinacy was clear, which in itself already represents an advance against traditional culture.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-08-10T17:35:06Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017-05-05
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
format masterThesis
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv ALMEIDA, Jane de Oliveira Rabelo de. Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia. 2017. 135 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2017.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2215
identifier_str_mv ALMEIDA, Jane de Oliveira Rabelo de. Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia. 2017. 135 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2017.
url https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2215
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa Strictu Sensu em Direito
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UCB
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Escola de Humanidade e Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron:UCB
instname_str Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron_str UCB
institution UCB
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2215/1/license.txt
https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2215/2/JanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf
https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2215/3/JanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf.txt
https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2215/4/JanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 302d2cd6169132532f8ce4ab3974cba3
3e9677fa5ca1963932cfd2cf81d5d806
1b6ebb77cb4a83f4228ba45426fe6e7d
8108ebd59ebeb0ee39e71c5a10b3ff82
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1724829775255568384