Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB |
Texto Completo: | https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2215 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study is to verify that the main issues may involve the social acceptance of the right to the implementation of ortotanasia in the context of the transformations brought about by the evolution of technology, Bioethics and, consequently, Law. It is a current theme, complex in itself, therefore involving the view of diverse disciplines, such as Biology, Philosophy and Sociology, which are represented in their constituent elements, such as common sense, science and culture, respectively. Religion stands out in this context, because the subject has the object of death and the treatment given to it. Theoretically, it was tried to characterize the evolution of the law in front of the social development resulting from the technological transformations and the emergence of Bioethics; analyzing ortotanasia in the context of the unfolding of the terminality of life; highlighting cultural aspects that can mobilize popular acceptance of controversial issues in general and ortotanasia in particular (common sense, science); to raise, among law students, objective and subjective aspects that may justify the non-undertaking of the artificial prolongation of life in terminal patients by the physician. Empirically, the results showed that there is still a lot of ignorance on the subject, which hinders or prevents answers that clearly point out the main difficulties of the social acceptance of ortotanasia. However, the tendency to recognize the right to refuse to therapeutic obstinacy was clear, which in itself already represents an advance against traditional culture. |
id |
UCB_bbdaf148f1e26c9abae1cc1f3d7c7a96 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:bdtd.ucb.br:tede/2215 |
network_acronym_str |
UCB |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB |
spelling |
Ribeiro, Diaulas Costahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8452624048767920http://lattes.cnpq.br/7298632829733429Almeida, Jane de Oliveira Rabelo de2017-08-10T17:35:06Z2017-05-05ALMEIDA, Jane de Oliveira Rabelo de. Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia. 2017. 135 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2017.https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2215The objective of this study is to verify that the main issues may involve the social acceptance of the right to the implementation of ortotanasia in the context of the transformations brought about by the evolution of technology, Bioethics and, consequently, Law. It is a current theme, complex in itself, therefore involving the view of diverse disciplines, such as Biology, Philosophy and Sociology, which are represented in their constituent elements, such as common sense, science and culture, respectively. Religion stands out in this context, because the subject has the object of death and the treatment given to it. Theoretically, it was tried to characterize the evolution of the law in front of the social development resulting from the technological transformations and the emergence of Bioethics; analyzing ortotanasia in the context of the unfolding of the terminality of life; highlighting cultural aspects that can mobilize popular acceptance of controversial issues in general and ortotanasia in particular (common sense, science); to raise, among law students, objective and subjective aspects that may justify the non-undertaking of the artificial prolongation of life in terminal patients by the physician. Empirically, the results showed that there is still a lot of ignorance on the subject, which hinders or prevents answers that clearly point out the main difficulties of the social acceptance of ortotanasia. However, the tendency to recognize the right to refuse to therapeutic obstinacy was clear, which in itself already represents an advance against traditional culture.O objetivo deste trabalho ?? verificar que principais quest??es podem envolver a aceita????o social do direito ?? implementa????o da ortotan??sia no contexto das transforma????es trazidas pela evolu????o da tecnologia, da Bio??tica e, consequentemente, do Direito. Trata-se de um tema atual, complexo em si, por isso mesmo envolvendo o olhar de disciplinas diversas, como o Biodireito, a Filosofia e a Sociologia, essas representadas em seus elementos constituintes, como senso comum, ci??ncia e cultura, respectivamente. A religi??o se destaca nesse contexto, pelo fato de o tema ter como objeto a morte e o tratamento dado a ela. Teoricamente, buscou-se caracterizar a evolu????o do Direito frente ao desenvolvimento social resultante das transforma????es tecnol??gicas e do surgimento da Bio??tica; analisar a ortotan??sia no contexto dos desdobramentos da terminalidade da vida; destacar aspectos culturais que podem mobilizar a aceita????o popular de quest??es pol??micas em geral e da ortotan??sia em particular (senso comum, ci??ncia); levantar, entre estudantes de Direito, aspectos objetivos e subjetivos que podem justificar o n??o empreendimento do prolongamento artificial da vida em pacientes terminais pelo m??dico. Empiricamente, os resultados demonstraram que ainda h?? muito desconhecimento sobre o assunto, o que dificulta ou impede respostas que claramente apontem as principais dificuldades da aceita????o social da ortotan??sia. Por??m, ficou clara a tend??ncia ao reconhecimento do direito de recusa ?? obstina????o terap??utica o que, em si, j?? representa um avan??o frente ?? cultura tradicional.Submitted by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2017-08-10T17:34:49Z No. of bitstreams: 1 JanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf: 1758339 bytes, checksum: 3e9677fa5ca1963932cfd2cf81d5d806 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2017-08-10T17:35:06Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 JanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf: 1758339 bytes, checksum: 3e9677fa5ca1963932cfd2cf81d5d806 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-10T17:35:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 JanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf: 1758339 bytes, checksum: 3e9677fa5ca1963932cfd2cf81d5d806 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-05-05application/pdfhttps://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/retrieve/4899/JanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Cat??lica de Bras??liaPrograma Strictu Sensu em DireitoUCBBrasilEscola de Humanidade e DireitoDireitoBio??ticaBiodireitoOrtotan??siaSenso comumCi??nciaCulturaCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITODilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??siainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCBinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82122https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2215/1/license.txt302d2cd6169132532f8ce4ab3974cba3MD51ORIGINALJanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdfJanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdfapplication/pdf1758339https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2215/2/JanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf3e9677fa5ca1963932cfd2cf81d5d806MD52TEXTJanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf.txtJanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf.txttext/plain305809https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2215/3/JanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf.txt1b6ebb77cb4a83f4228ba45426fe6e7dMD53THUMBNAILJanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf.jpgJanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5099https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2215/4/JanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf.jpg8108ebd59ebeb0ee39e71c5a10b3ff82MD54tede/22152019-09-19 09:18:12.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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/ |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia |
title |
Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia |
spellingShingle |
Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia Almeida, Jane de Oliveira Rabelo de Direito Bio??tica Biodireito Ortotan??sia Senso comum Ci??ncia Cultura CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
title_short |
Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia |
title_full |
Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia |
title_fullStr |
Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia |
title_sort |
Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia |
author |
Almeida, Jane de Oliveira Rabelo de |
author_facet |
Almeida, Jane de Oliveira Rabelo de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro, Diaulas Costa |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/8452624048767920 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7298632829733429 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Almeida, Jane de Oliveira Rabelo de |
contributor_str_mv |
Ribeiro, Diaulas Costa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direito Bio??tica Biodireito Ortotan??sia Senso comum Ci??ncia Cultura |
topic |
Direito Bio??tica Biodireito Ortotan??sia Senso comum Ci??ncia Cultura CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.description.abstract.eng.fl_txt_mv |
The objective of this study is to verify that the main issues may involve the social acceptance of the right to the implementation of ortotanasia in the context of the transformations brought about by the evolution of technology, Bioethics and, consequently, Law. It is a current theme, complex in itself, therefore involving the view of diverse disciplines, such as Biology, Philosophy and Sociology, which are represented in their constituent elements, such as common sense, science and culture, respectively. Religion stands out in this context, because the subject has the object of death and the treatment given to it. Theoretically, it was tried to characterize the evolution of the law in front of the social development resulting from the technological transformations and the emergence of Bioethics; analyzing ortotanasia in the context of the unfolding of the terminality of life; highlighting cultural aspects that can mobilize popular acceptance of controversial issues in general and ortotanasia in particular (common sense, science); to raise, among law students, objective and subjective aspects that may justify the non-undertaking of the artificial prolongation of life in terminal patients by the physician. Empirically, the results showed that there is still a lot of ignorance on the subject, which hinders or prevents answers that clearly point out the main difficulties of the social acceptance of ortotanasia. However, the tendency to recognize the right to refuse to therapeutic obstinacy was clear, which in itself already represents an advance against traditional culture. |
dc.description.abstract.por.fl_txt_mv |
O objetivo deste trabalho ?? verificar que principais quest??es podem envolver a aceita????o social do direito ?? implementa????o da ortotan??sia no contexto das transforma????es trazidas pela evolu????o da tecnologia, da Bio??tica e, consequentemente, do Direito. Trata-se de um tema atual, complexo em si, por isso mesmo envolvendo o olhar de disciplinas diversas, como o Biodireito, a Filosofia e a Sociologia, essas representadas em seus elementos constituintes, como senso comum, ci??ncia e cultura, respectivamente. A religi??o se destaca nesse contexto, pelo fato de o tema ter como objeto a morte e o tratamento dado a ela. Teoricamente, buscou-se caracterizar a evolu????o do Direito frente ao desenvolvimento social resultante das transforma????es tecnol??gicas e do surgimento da Bio??tica; analisar a ortotan??sia no contexto dos desdobramentos da terminalidade da vida; destacar aspectos culturais que podem mobilizar a aceita????o popular de quest??es pol??micas em geral e da ortotan??sia em particular (senso comum, ci??ncia); levantar, entre estudantes de Direito, aspectos objetivos e subjetivos que podem justificar o n??o empreendimento do prolongamento artificial da vida em pacientes terminais pelo m??dico. Empiricamente, os resultados demonstraram que ainda h?? muito desconhecimento sobre o assunto, o que dificulta ou impede respostas que claramente apontem as principais dificuldades da aceita????o social da ortotan??sia. Por??m, ficou clara a tend??ncia ao reconhecimento do direito de recusa ?? obstina????o terap??utica o que, em si, j?? representa um avan??o frente ?? cultura tradicional. |
description |
The objective of this study is to verify that the main issues may involve the social acceptance of the right to the implementation of ortotanasia in the context of the transformations brought about by the evolution of technology, Bioethics and, consequently, Law. It is a current theme, complex in itself, therefore involving the view of diverse disciplines, such as Biology, Philosophy and Sociology, which are represented in their constituent elements, such as common sense, science and culture, respectively. Religion stands out in this context, because the subject has the object of death and the treatment given to it. Theoretically, it was tried to characterize the evolution of the law in front of the social development resulting from the technological transformations and the emergence of Bioethics; analyzing ortotanasia in the context of the unfolding of the terminality of life; highlighting cultural aspects that can mobilize popular acceptance of controversial issues in general and ortotanasia in particular (common sense, science); to raise, among law students, objective and subjective aspects that may justify the non-undertaking of the artificial prolongation of life in terminal patients by the physician. Empirically, the results showed that there is still a lot of ignorance on the subject, which hinders or prevents answers that clearly point out the main difficulties of the social acceptance of ortotanasia. However, the tendency to recognize the right to refuse to therapeutic obstinacy was clear, which in itself already represents an advance against traditional culture. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-10T17:35:06Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017-05-05 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
format |
masterThesis |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
ALMEIDA, Jane de Oliveira Rabelo de. Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia. 2017. 135 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2017. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2215 |
identifier_str_mv |
ALMEIDA, Jane de Oliveira Rabelo de. Dilemas de vida e de morte: um estudo sociojur??dico sobre a ortotan??sia. 2017. 135 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2017. |
url |
https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2215 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa Strictu Sensu em Direito |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UCB |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Humanidade e Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) instacron:UCB |
instname_str |
Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) |
instacron_str |
UCB |
institution |
UCB |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2215/1/license.txt https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2215/2/JanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2215/3/JanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf.txt https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2215/4/JanedeOliveiraRabelodeAlmeidaDissertacao2016.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
302d2cd6169132532f8ce4ab3974cba3 3e9677fa5ca1963932cfd2cf81d5d806 1b6ebb77cb4a83f4228ba45426fe6e7d 8108ebd59ebeb0ee39e71c5a10b3ff82 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1724829775255568384 |