Influence of nitrogen, environment, and cultivars on the industrial quality of wheat

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Raphael Rossi
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Zucareli, Claudemir, Fonseca, Inês Cristina de Batista, Gazola, Diego, Riede, Carlos Roberto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/34203
Resumo: The quality of wheat is a pre-eminent factor in the criteria for commercialization of this cereal, and several parameters contribute to the evaluation of wheat quality. The objective of this study was to verify the effects of nitrogen fertilization on the cover and the environment for wheat cultivars and the effects on the industrial quality of the grain. Furthermore, we sought to identify correlations between the parameters of industrial quality. Experiments were conducted in Londrina for 2 years, in two distinct environments (A1 and A2). The experimental design was a randomized complete block design with four replications. The cultivars IPR Catuara TM, BRS Gaivota, Quartzo, and CD 120 were evaluated with different forms of nitrogen management: N1, without N in coverage; N2, 60 kg ha-1 of N in the form of urea at the beginning of tillering; N3, 80 kg ha-1 of N in urea formulation (60 kg ha-1 in tillering and 20 kg ha-1 in booting); N4, 100 kg ha-1 of N in the form of urea (60 kg ha-1 in tillering and 40 kg ha-1 in booting); N5, 80 kg ha-1 of N (60 kg ha-1 of N in the form of urea at the beginning of tillering, and 20 kg ha-1 of N in the form of ammonium sulfate in booting); N6, 100 kg ha-1 of N (60 kg ha-1 of N in the form of urea at the beginning of tillering, and 40 kg ha-1 of N in the form of ammonium sulfate in booting). Further, we evaluated grain yield, protein content, sedimentation volume with sodium dodecyl sulfate, and parameters of alveograph and farinograph. Nitrogen fertilization did not influence industrial quality parameters. The stability of the mass was influenced by the isolated effects of cultivars and the environment. The interaction of cultivars and environments influenced the parameters of alveograph and water absorption of the mass. The higher the protein content, the lower the stability of the mass, independent of the cultivar.
id UEL-11_5294e69aa641e067a628c64e2882c923
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34203
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Influence of nitrogen, environment, and cultivars on the industrial quality of wheatInfluência do nitrogênio, ambiente e cultivares na qualidade industrial de trigoFarinographGluten strengthTriticum aestivum LProtein contentNitrogen management.FarinografiaForça de glútenTeor de proteínasTriticum aestivum LManejo do nitrogênio.The quality of wheat is a pre-eminent factor in the criteria for commercialization of this cereal, and several parameters contribute to the evaluation of wheat quality. The objective of this study was to verify the effects of nitrogen fertilization on the cover and the environment for wheat cultivars and the effects on the industrial quality of the grain. Furthermore, we sought to identify correlations between the parameters of industrial quality. Experiments were conducted in Londrina for 2 years, in two distinct environments (A1 and A2). The experimental design was a randomized complete block design with four replications. The cultivars IPR Catuara TM, BRS Gaivota, Quartzo, and CD 120 were evaluated with different forms of nitrogen management: N1, without N in coverage; N2, 60 kg ha-1 of N in the form of urea at the beginning of tillering; N3, 80 kg ha-1 of N in urea formulation (60 kg ha-1 in tillering and 20 kg ha-1 in booting); N4, 100 kg ha-1 of N in the form of urea (60 kg ha-1 in tillering and 40 kg ha-1 in booting); N5, 80 kg ha-1 of N (60 kg ha-1 of N in the form of urea at the beginning of tillering, and 20 kg ha-1 of N in the form of ammonium sulfate in booting); N6, 100 kg ha-1 of N (60 kg ha-1 of N in the form of urea at the beginning of tillering, and 40 kg ha-1 of N in the form of ammonium sulfate in booting). Further, we evaluated grain yield, protein content, sedimentation volume with sodium dodecyl sulfate, and parameters of alveograph and farinograph. Nitrogen fertilization did not influence industrial quality parameters. The stability of the mass was influenced by the isolated effects of cultivars and the environment. The interaction of cultivars and environments influenced the parameters of alveograph and water absorption of the mass. The higher the protein content, the lower the stability of the mass, independent of the cultivar.A qualidade do trigo é fator preponderante nos critérios para comercialização desse cereal e diversos parâmetros contribuem na avaliação de sua qualidade. O objetivo deste estudo foi verificar o efeito da adubação nitrogenada de cobertura e do ambiente, em cultivares de trigo e seus efeitos na qualidade industrial do grão, bem como identificar correlações entre os parâmetros de qualidade industrial. Foram conduzidos experimentos em Londrina em dois anos, caracterizando dois ambientes (A1 e A2). O delineamento experimental utilizado foi o de blocos ao acaso em parcelas subdivididas, com quatro repetições. Foram avaliadas as cultivares IPR Catuara TM, BRS Gaivota, Quartzo e CD 120 em diferentes formas de manejo do nitrogênio em cobertura: N1 – sem N em cobertura; N2 – 60 kg ha-1 de N na formulação de ureia no início do perfilhamento; N3 - 80 kg ha-1 de N na formulação de ureia, (60 kg ha-1 no perfilhamento e 20 kg ha-1 no emborrachamento); N4 - 100 kg ha-1 de N na formulação de ureia (60 kg ha-1 no perfilhamento e 40 kg ha-1 no emborrachamento); N5 - 80 kg ha-1 de N (60 kg ha-1 de N na formulação de ureia no início do perfilhamento, e 20 kg ha-1 de N na formulação de sulfato de amônio no emborrachamento); N6 - 100 kg ha-1 de N (60 kg ha-1 de N na formulação de ureia no início do perfilhamento, e 40 kg ha-1 de N na formulação de sulfato de amônio no emborrachamento). Foram procedidas as avaliações da produtividade de grãos, do teor de proteínas, do volume de sedimentação com dodecil sulfato de sódio e dos parâmetros de alveografia e farinografia. A adubação nitrogenada não influencia os parâmetros de qualidade industrial. A estabilidade da massa é influenciada pelos efeitos isolados de cultivar e ambiente. A interação cultivares e ambientes influencia os parâmetros de alveografia e absorção de água da massa. Quanto maior o teor protéico menor a estabilidade da massa, independentemente da cultivar. UEL2019-08-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Empírica de Campoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/3420310.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n6p2571Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 6 (2019); 2571-2580Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 6 (2019); 2571-25801679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/34203/25932Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Raphael RossiZucareli, ClaudemirFonseca, Inês Cristina de BatistaGazola, DiegoRiede, Carlos Roberto2022-10-10T16:49:57Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34203Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-10T16:49:57Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of nitrogen, environment, and cultivars on the industrial quality of wheat
Influência do nitrogênio, ambiente e cultivares na qualidade industrial de trigo
title Influence of nitrogen, environment, and cultivars on the industrial quality of wheat
spellingShingle Influence of nitrogen, environment, and cultivars on the industrial quality of wheat
Silva, Raphael Rossi
Farinograph
Gluten strength
Triticum aestivum L
Protein content
Nitrogen management.
Farinografia
Força de glúten
Teor de proteínas
Triticum aestivum L
Manejo do nitrogênio.
title_short Influence of nitrogen, environment, and cultivars on the industrial quality of wheat
title_full Influence of nitrogen, environment, and cultivars on the industrial quality of wheat
title_fullStr Influence of nitrogen, environment, and cultivars on the industrial quality of wheat
title_full_unstemmed Influence of nitrogen, environment, and cultivars on the industrial quality of wheat
title_sort Influence of nitrogen, environment, and cultivars on the industrial quality of wheat
author Silva, Raphael Rossi
author_facet Silva, Raphael Rossi
Zucareli, Claudemir
Fonseca, Inês Cristina de Batista
Gazola, Diego
Riede, Carlos Roberto
author_role author
author2 Zucareli, Claudemir
Fonseca, Inês Cristina de Batista
Gazola, Diego
Riede, Carlos Roberto
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Raphael Rossi
Zucareli, Claudemir
Fonseca, Inês Cristina de Batista
Gazola, Diego
Riede, Carlos Roberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Farinograph
Gluten strength
Triticum aestivum L
Protein content
Nitrogen management.
Farinografia
Força de glúten
Teor de proteínas
Triticum aestivum L
Manejo do nitrogênio.
topic Farinograph
Gluten strength
Triticum aestivum L
Protein content
Nitrogen management.
Farinografia
Força de glúten
Teor de proteínas
Triticum aestivum L
Manejo do nitrogênio.
description The quality of wheat is a pre-eminent factor in the criteria for commercialization of this cereal, and several parameters contribute to the evaluation of wheat quality. The objective of this study was to verify the effects of nitrogen fertilization on the cover and the environment for wheat cultivars and the effects on the industrial quality of the grain. Furthermore, we sought to identify correlations between the parameters of industrial quality. Experiments were conducted in Londrina for 2 years, in two distinct environments (A1 and A2). The experimental design was a randomized complete block design with four replications. The cultivars IPR Catuara TM, BRS Gaivota, Quartzo, and CD 120 were evaluated with different forms of nitrogen management: N1, without N in coverage; N2, 60 kg ha-1 of N in the form of urea at the beginning of tillering; N3, 80 kg ha-1 of N in urea formulation (60 kg ha-1 in tillering and 20 kg ha-1 in booting); N4, 100 kg ha-1 of N in the form of urea (60 kg ha-1 in tillering and 40 kg ha-1 in booting); N5, 80 kg ha-1 of N (60 kg ha-1 of N in the form of urea at the beginning of tillering, and 20 kg ha-1 of N in the form of ammonium sulfate in booting); N6, 100 kg ha-1 of N (60 kg ha-1 of N in the form of urea at the beginning of tillering, and 40 kg ha-1 of N in the form of ammonium sulfate in booting). Further, we evaluated grain yield, protein content, sedimentation volume with sodium dodecyl sulfate, and parameters of alveograph and farinograph. Nitrogen fertilization did not influence industrial quality parameters. The stability of the mass was influenced by the isolated effects of cultivars and the environment. The interaction of cultivars and environments influenced the parameters of alveograph and water absorption of the mass. The higher the protein content, the lower the stability of the mass, independent of the cultivar.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa Empírica de Campo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/34203
10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n6p2571
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/34203
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n6p2571
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/34203/25932
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 6 (2019); 2571-2580
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 6 (2019); 2571-2580
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306080418791424