Coverage comparison by knapsack sprayers manual and engine powered

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ruas, João Miguel Francisco
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Balan, Rafael, Abi Saab, Otávio Jorge Grigoli
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/5151
Resumo: The aim of this study is to compare the application efficiency between costal manual sprayer and an engine powered. Trapezoidal architecture of coffee plants and leafs position constitute a large obstacle to spraying. In this context, application technology became an important factor. One alternative is the use of air assistance to accomplish the distance between the sprayer and the application target. This experiment was entirely randomized with four replications, comparing the two spraying equipments regarding the coverage percentage in three different heights (superior, median and inferior), two different leafs position (external and internal) and two foliar faces (abaxial and adaxial), totalizing 48 plots. The spray rate used was 100L.ha-1, composed by a water solution with fluorescent tracer. Based on results observed from leafs located in the external position and leafs from internal position of the median height, they denote that the utilization of air assistance is more efficient in leafs percent coverage in coffee plants than a conventional sprayers. This result was especially noted at the abaxial leaves side in the external position, as well as on both sides of the leaves positioned internally and in the plant medium.
id UEL-11_6fe8df50cb226b801cfc951de6979eaa
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5151
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Coverage comparison by knapsack sprayers manual and engine poweredComparação da cobertura de pulverizadores costais de acionamento manual e motorizadoCoffeeApplication technologySpray.CaféTecnologia de aplicaçãoPulverização.Mecanização AgrícolaThe aim of this study is to compare the application efficiency between costal manual sprayer and an engine powered. Trapezoidal architecture of coffee plants and leafs position constitute a large obstacle to spraying. In this context, application technology became an important factor. One alternative is the use of air assistance to accomplish the distance between the sprayer and the application target. This experiment was entirely randomized with four replications, comparing the two spraying equipments regarding the coverage percentage in three different heights (superior, median and inferior), two different leafs position (external and internal) and two foliar faces (abaxial and adaxial), totalizing 48 plots. The spray rate used was 100L.ha-1, composed by a water solution with fluorescent tracer. Based on results observed from leafs located in the external position and leafs from internal position of the median height, they denote that the utilization of air assistance is more efficient in leafs percent coverage in coffee plants than a conventional sprayers. This result was especially noted at the abaxial leaves side in the external position, as well as on both sides of the leaves positioned internally and in the plant medium.O objetivo deste trabalho foi comparar a eficiência da aplicação entre o pulverizador costal de acionamento por alavanca manual e o pulverizador costal motorizado (assistência de ar). A arquitetura trapezoidal da planta de café e o posicionamento das folhas constituem sérios entraves à aplicação. Nesse contexto a tecnologia de aplicação torna-se um fator de grande importância. Uma alternativa é o uso de assistência de ar para que se vença a distância entre o pulverizador e o alvo pretendido. O experimento foi delineado no esquema inteiramente casualisado com quatro repetições, comparando os dois equipamentos de pulverização quanto à porcentagem de cobertura em três diferentes alturas (superior, médio e inferior), duas diferentes posições de folhas (externas e internas) e duas faces foliares (abaxial e adaxial), totalizando 48 parcelas. A taxa de aplicação utilizada foi de 100L.ha-1, sendo a calda composta por traçante fluorescente diluído em água. Com base nos resultados observados tanto para as folhas situadas na posição externa, como para as folhas da altura mediana na posição interna, denotam que a utilização do pulverizador motorizado (com assistência de ar) foi mais eficiente na cobertura das folhas do cafeeiro do que o pulverizador convencional. Esse resultado foi especialmente notado na face abaxial das folhas situadas na posição externa da plantas, assim como, nas duas faces das folhas posicionadas internamente e na parte mediana.UEL2011-10-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa de campoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/515110.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n4p1417Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 32 No. 4 (2011); 1417-1422Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 32 n. 4 (2011); 1417-14221679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/5151/8904Ruas, João Miguel FranciscoBalan, RafaelAbi Saab, Otávio Jorge Grigoliinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-11-19T18:37:47Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5151Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2015-11-19T18:37:47Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Coverage comparison by knapsack sprayers manual and engine powered
Comparação da cobertura de pulverizadores costais de acionamento manual e motorizado
title Coverage comparison by knapsack sprayers manual and engine powered
spellingShingle Coverage comparison by knapsack sprayers manual and engine powered
Ruas, João Miguel Francisco
Coffee
Application technology
Spray.
Café
Tecnologia de aplicação
Pulverização.
Mecanização Agrícola
title_short Coverage comparison by knapsack sprayers manual and engine powered
title_full Coverage comparison by knapsack sprayers manual and engine powered
title_fullStr Coverage comparison by knapsack sprayers manual and engine powered
title_full_unstemmed Coverage comparison by knapsack sprayers manual and engine powered
title_sort Coverage comparison by knapsack sprayers manual and engine powered
author Ruas, João Miguel Francisco
author_facet Ruas, João Miguel Francisco
Balan, Rafael
Abi Saab, Otávio Jorge Grigoli
author_role author
author2 Balan, Rafael
Abi Saab, Otávio Jorge Grigoli
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ruas, João Miguel Francisco
Balan, Rafael
Abi Saab, Otávio Jorge Grigoli
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Coffee
Application technology
Spray.
Café
Tecnologia de aplicação
Pulverização.
Mecanização Agrícola
topic Coffee
Application technology
Spray.
Café
Tecnologia de aplicação
Pulverização.
Mecanização Agrícola
description The aim of this study is to compare the application efficiency between costal manual sprayer and an engine powered. Trapezoidal architecture of coffee plants and leafs position constitute a large obstacle to spraying. In this context, application technology became an important factor. One alternative is the use of air assistance to accomplish the distance between the sprayer and the application target. This experiment was entirely randomized with four replications, comparing the two spraying equipments regarding the coverage percentage in three different heights (superior, median and inferior), two different leafs position (external and internal) and two foliar faces (abaxial and adaxial), totalizing 48 plots. The spray rate used was 100L.ha-1, composed by a water solution with fluorescent tracer. Based on results observed from leafs located in the external position and leafs from internal position of the median height, they denote that the utilization of air assistance is more efficient in leafs percent coverage in coffee plants than a conventional sprayers. This result was especially noted at the abaxial leaves side in the external position, as well as on both sides of the leaves positioned internally and in the plant medium.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-10-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa de campo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/5151
10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n4p1417
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/5151
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n4p1417
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/5151/8904
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 32 No. 4 (2011); 1417-1422
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 32 n. 4 (2011); 1417-1422
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306061883113472