From judicial protagonism to institucional dialogues: an introduction to Kramer's popular constitucionalis, Sunstein's minimalism, and the dialogical theories of Bateup and Linares
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/34145 |
Resumo: | This article examines some of the different theories and conceptions that seek alternative forms of opposition to judicial protagonism, either through dialogical theories, which propose that there be a dialogue between the powers, their institutions and popular movements; or by state models that do not contemplate the Judiciary as having the final word in law, such as Kramer's popular constitutionalism, Sunstein's democratic constitutionalism and Minimalism. Without retension to exhaust such analytical aspects, the article introduces the dialogical theories from the systematization of Bateup and Linares. The work leads to a reflection on the limits and possibilities of these forms of dialogue, and their importance for guaranteeing access to justice and for the enjoyment of fundamental rights in contemporary democracies. From this study, the objective of the article is to counter to the judicial protagonism these diverse proposals of State that seek a dialogue between the powers through the study of the selected authors and the several institutions, using bibliographical revision in the field of the right constitutional and comparative. |
id |
UEL-2_f97e9ec4d8204b87b36b0c78effa339f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34145 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
From judicial protagonism to institucional dialogues: an introduction to Kramer's popular constitucionalis, Sunstein's minimalism, and the dialogical theories of Bateup and LinaresDo protagonismo judicial aos diálogos institucionais: uma introdução ao constitucionalismo popular de Kramer, ao minimalismo de Sunstein e às teorias dialógicas de Bateup e LinaresInstitutional dialoguesPopular constitutionalismMinimalismDialogical theories.Diálogos institucionaisConstitucionalismo popularMinimalismoTeorias dialógicasThis article examines some of the different theories and conceptions that seek alternative forms of opposition to judicial protagonism, either through dialogical theories, which propose that there be a dialogue between the powers, their institutions and popular movements; or by state models that do not contemplate the Judiciary as having the final word in law, such as Kramer's popular constitutionalism, Sunstein's democratic constitutionalism and Minimalism. Without retension to exhaust such analytical aspects, the article introduces the dialogical theories from the systematization of Bateup and Linares. The work leads to a reflection on the limits and possibilities of these forms of dialogue, and their importance for guaranteeing access to justice and for the enjoyment of fundamental rights in contemporary democracies. From this study, the objective of the article is to counter to the judicial protagonism these diverse proposals of State that seek a dialogue between the powers through the study of the selected authors and the several institutions, using bibliographical revision in the field of the right constitutional and comparative.O presente artigo examina algumas das diversas teorias e concepções que buscam formas alternativas ou de oposição ao protagonismo judicial, seja por meio das teorias dialógicas, que propõem que haja um diálogo entre os poderes, suas instituições e os movimentos populares; seja por modelos de Estado que não contemplem o Judiciário como detentor da palavra final no direito, como é o caso do constitucionalismo popular, do constitucionalismo democrático e do Minimalismo. O trabalho leva a uma reflexão sobre os limites e possibilidades dessas formas de diálogo, e sua importância para a garantia do acesso à justiça e para a fruição dos direitos fundamentais nas democracias contemporâneas. A partir deste quadro de estudo, o objetivo do artigo é contrapor ao protagonismo judicial essas diversas propostas de Estado que buscam um diálogo entre os poderes e as diversas instituições, utilizando-se de pesquisa documental e de revisão bibliográfica no campo do direito constitucional e comparadoUniversidade Estadual de Londrina2018-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/3414510.5433/1980-511X.2018v13n2p267Revista do Direito Público; v. 13 n. 2 (2018); 267-2961980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/34145/24160Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Direito Públicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssis, Fábio José Silva deSilva, Sayonara Grillo Coutinho Leonardo da2018-08-31T18:11:02Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34145Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2018-08-31T18:11:02Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
From judicial protagonism to institucional dialogues: an introduction to Kramer's popular constitucionalis, Sunstein's minimalism, and the dialogical theories of Bateup and Linares Do protagonismo judicial aos diálogos institucionais: uma introdução ao constitucionalismo popular de Kramer, ao minimalismo de Sunstein e às teorias dialógicas de Bateup e Linares |
title |
From judicial protagonism to institucional dialogues: an introduction to Kramer's popular constitucionalis, Sunstein's minimalism, and the dialogical theories of Bateup and Linares |
spellingShingle |
From judicial protagonism to institucional dialogues: an introduction to Kramer's popular constitucionalis, Sunstein's minimalism, and the dialogical theories of Bateup and Linares Assis, Fábio José Silva de Institutional dialogues Popular constitutionalism Minimalism Dialogical theories. Diálogos institucionais Constitucionalismo popular Minimalismo Teorias dialógicas |
title_short |
From judicial protagonism to institucional dialogues: an introduction to Kramer's popular constitucionalis, Sunstein's minimalism, and the dialogical theories of Bateup and Linares |
title_full |
From judicial protagonism to institucional dialogues: an introduction to Kramer's popular constitucionalis, Sunstein's minimalism, and the dialogical theories of Bateup and Linares |
title_fullStr |
From judicial protagonism to institucional dialogues: an introduction to Kramer's popular constitucionalis, Sunstein's minimalism, and the dialogical theories of Bateup and Linares |
title_full_unstemmed |
From judicial protagonism to institucional dialogues: an introduction to Kramer's popular constitucionalis, Sunstein's minimalism, and the dialogical theories of Bateup and Linares |
title_sort |
From judicial protagonism to institucional dialogues: an introduction to Kramer's popular constitucionalis, Sunstein's minimalism, and the dialogical theories of Bateup and Linares |
author |
Assis, Fábio José Silva de |
author_facet |
Assis, Fábio José Silva de Silva, Sayonara Grillo Coutinho Leonardo da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Sayonara Grillo Coutinho Leonardo da |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Assis, Fábio José Silva de Silva, Sayonara Grillo Coutinho Leonardo da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Institutional dialogues Popular constitutionalism Minimalism Dialogical theories. Diálogos institucionais Constitucionalismo popular Minimalismo Teorias dialógicas |
topic |
Institutional dialogues Popular constitutionalism Minimalism Dialogical theories. Diálogos institucionais Constitucionalismo popular Minimalismo Teorias dialógicas |
description |
This article examines some of the different theories and conceptions that seek alternative forms of opposition to judicial protagonism, either through dialogical theories, which propose that there be a dialogue between the powers, their institutions and popular movements; or by state models that do not contemplate the Judiciary as having the final word in law, such as Kramer's popular constitutionalism, Sunstein's democratic constitutionalism and Minimalism. Without retension to exhaust such analytical aspects, the article introduces the dialogical theories from the systematization of Bateup and Linares. The work leads to a reflection on the limits and possibilities of these forms of dialogue, and their importance for guaranteeing access to justice and for the enjoyment of fundamental rights in contemporary democracies. From this study, the objective of the article is to counter to the judicial protagonism these diverse proposals of State that seek a dialogue between the powers through the study of the selected authors and the several institutions, using bibliographical revision in the field of the right constitutional and comparative. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/34145 10.5433/1980-511X.2018v13n2p267 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/34145 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2018v13n2p267 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/34145/24160 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Direito Público info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Direito Público |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 13 n. 2 (2018); 267-296 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305932175310848 |