From judicial protagonism to institucional dialogues: an introduction to Kramer's popular constitucionalis, Sunstein's minimalism, and the dialogical theories of Bateup and Linares

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Assis, Fábio José Silva de
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Silva, Sayonara Grillo Coutinho Leonardo da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/34145
Resumo: This article examines some of the different theories and conceptions that seek alternative forms of opposition to judicial protagonism, either through dialogical theories, which propose that there be a dialogue between the powers, their institutions and popular movements; or by state models that do not contemplate the Judiciary as having the final word in law, such as Kramer's popular constitutionalism, Sunstein's democratic constitutionalism and Minimalism. Without  retension to exhaust such analytical aspects, the article introduces the dialogical theories from the systematization of Bateup and Linares. The work leads to a reflection on the limits and possibilities of these forms of dialogue, and their importance for guaranteeing access to justice and for the enjoyment of fundamental rights in contemporary democracies. From this study, the objective of the article is to counter to the judicial protagonism these diverse proposals of State that seek a dialogue between the powers through the study of the selected authors and the several institutions, using bibliographical revision in the field of the right constitutional and comparative.
id UEL-2_f97e9ec4d8204b87b36b0c78effa339f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34145
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling From judicial protagonism to institucional dialogues: an introduction to Kramer's popular constitucionalis, Sunstein's minimalism, and the dialogical theories of Bateup and LinaresDo protagonismo judicial aos diálogos institucionais: uma introdução ao constitucionalismo popular de Kramer, ao minimalismo de Sunstein e às teorias dialógicas de Bateup e LinaresInstitutional dialoguesPopular constitutionalismMinimalismDialogical theories.Diálogos institucionaisConstitucionalismo popularMinimalismoTeorias dialógicasThis article examines some of the different theories and conceptions that seek alternative forms of opposition to judicial protagonism, either through dialogical theories, which propose that there be a dialogue between the powers, their institutions and popular movements; or by state models that do not contemplate the Judiciary as having the final word in law, such as Kramer's popular constitutionalism, Sunstein's democratic constitutionalism and Minimalism. Without  retension to exhaust such analytical aspects, the article introduces the dialogical theories from the systematization of Bateup and Linares. The work leads to a reflection on the limits and possibilities of these forms of dialogue, and their importance for guaranteeing access to justice and for the enjoyment of fundamental rights in contemporary democracies. From this study, the objective of the article is to counter to the judicial protagonism these diverse proposals of State that seek a dialogue between the powers through the study of the selected authors and the several institutions, using bibliographical revision in the field of the right constitutional and comparative.O presente artigo examina algumas das diversas teorias e concepções que buscam formas alternativas ou de oposição ao protagonismo judicial, seja por meio das teorias dialógicas, que propõem que haja um diálogo entre os poderes, suas instituições e os movimentos populares; seja por modelos de Estado que não contemplem o Judiciário como detentor da palavra final no direito, como é o caso do constitucionalismo popular, do constitucionalismo democrático e do Minimalismo. O trabalho leva a uma reflexão sobre os limites e possibilidades dessas formas de diálogo, e sua importância para a garantia do acesso à justiça e para a fruição dos direitos fundamentais nas democracias contemporâneas. A partir deste quadro de estudo, o objetivo do artigo é contrapor ao protagonismo judicial essas diversas propostas de Estado que buscam um diálogo entre os poderes e as diversas instituições, utilizando-se de pesquisa documental e de revisão bibliográfica no campo do direito constitucional e comparadoUniversidade Estadual de Londrina2018-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/3414510.5433/1980-511X.2018v13n2p267Revista do Direito Público; v. 13 n. 2 (2018); 267-2961980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/34145/24160Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Direito Públicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssis, Fábio José Silva deSilva, Sayonara Grillo Coutinho Leonardo da2018-08-31T18:11:02Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34145Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2018-08-31T18:11:02Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv From judicial protagonism to institucional dialogues: an introduction to Kramer's popular constitucionalis, Sunstein's minimalism, and the dialogical theories of Bateup and Linares
Do protagonismo judicial aos diálogos institucionais: uma introdução ao constitucionalismo popular de Kramer, ao minimalismo de Sunstein e às teorias dialógicas de Bateup e Linares
title From judicial protagonism to institucional dialogues: an introduction to Kramer's popular constitucionalis, Sunstein's minimalism, and the dialogical theories of Bateup and Linares
spellingShingle From judicial protagonism to institucional dialogues: an introduction to Kramer's popular constitucionalis, Sunstein's minimalism, and the dialogical theories of Bateup and Linares
Assis, Fábio José Silva de
Institutional dialogues
Popular constitutionalism
Minimalism
Dialogical theories.
Diálogos institucionais
Constitucionalismo popular
Minimalismo
Teorias dialógicas
title_short From judicial protagonism to institucional dialogues: an introduction to Kramer's popular constitucionalis, Sunstein's minimalism, and the dialogical theories of Bateup and Linares
title_full From judicial protagonism to institucional dialogues: an introduction to Kramer's popular constitucionalis, Sunstein's minimalism, and the dialogical theories of Bateup and Linares
title_fullStr From judicial protagonism to institucional dialogues: an introduction to Kramer's popular constitucionalis, Sunstein's minimalism, and the dialogical theories of Bateup and Linares
title_full_unstemmed From judicial protagonism to institucional dialogues: an introduction to Kramer's popular constitucionalis, Sunstein's minimalism, and the dialogical theories of Bateup and Linares
title_sort From judicial protagonism to institucional dialogues: an introduction to Kramer's popular constitucionalis, Sunstein's minimalism, and the dialogical theories of Bateup and Linares
author Assis, Fábio José Silva de
author_facet Assis, Fábio José Silva de
Silva, Sayonara Grillo Coutinho Leonardo da
author_role author
author2 Silva, Sayonara Grillo Coutinho Leonardo da
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Assis, Fábio José Silva de
Silva, Sayonara Grillo Coutinho Leonardo da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Institutional dialogues
Popular constitutionalism
Minimalism
Dialogical theories.
Diálogos institucionais
Constitucionalismo popular
Minimalismo
Teorias dialógicas
topic Institutional dialogues
Popular constitutionalism
Minimalism
Dialogical theories.
Diálogos institucionais
Constitucionalismo popular
Minimalismo
Teorias dialógicas
description This article examines some of the different theories and conceptions that seek alternative forms of opposition to judicial protagonism, either through dialogical theories, which propose that there be a dialogue between the powers, their institutions and popular movements; or by state models that do not contemplate the Judiciary as having the final word in law, such as Kramer's popular constitutionalism, Sunstein's democratic constitutionalism and Minimalism. Without  retension to exhaust such analytical aspects, the article introduces the dialogical theories from the systematization of Bateup and Linares. The work leads to a reflection on the limits and possibilities of these forms of dialogue, and their importance for guaranteeing access to justice and for the enjoyment of fundamental rights in contemporary democracies. From this study, the objective of the article is to counter to the judicial protagonism these diverse proposals of State that seek a dialogue between the powers through the study of the selected authors and the several institutions, using bibliographical revision in the field of the right constitutional and comparative.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/34145
10.5433/1980-511X.2018v13n2p267
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/34145
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2018v13n2p267
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/34145/24160
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Direito Público
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Direito Público
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 13 n. 2 (2018); 267-296
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1799305932175310848

Registros relacionados