Reflecting on corporate social responsability: implications of a multidisciplinary reading

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lebbos Favoreto, Ricardo
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Bannwart Júnior, Clodomiro José, França Mazzei Nogueira, Arnaldo José
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/38159
Resumo: In recent decades, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has gained headway in academic research and managerial practice. Although CSR has become notorious, its concept still raises doubts. What is CSR really about? How do the parties involved in CSR relate? Is the concept of CSR influenced by any kind of control? With the spread of CSR, its concept became unclear, attracting different meanings that emerged as the results of the forces involved. In order to better understand the concept, this article presents a multidisciplinary reading of CSR. For this purpose, the contributions of three areas of knowledge are used: Business, Law and Philosophy, focusing on Habermasian thought. Habermas’ Theory of Communicative Action makes it possible to take a critical view on CSR, extending its traditional meaning. This essay faces some important questions that surrounds CSR and brings attention to the necessity of consciously improve its concept
id UEL-6_0a76ccb0bd79d4853edfcc92302bb112
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38159
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Reflecting on corporate social responsability: implications of a multidisciplinary readingProblematizando o conceito de responsabilidade social empresarial: implicações de uma leitura multidisciplinarCorporate Social ResponsibilityBusiness ManagementLawHabermasTheory of Communicative ActionResponsabilidade Social EmpresarialGestão EmpresarialDireitoHabermasTeoria da Ação ComunicativaIn recent decades, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has gained headway in academic research and managerial practice. Although CSR has become notorious, its concept still raises doubts. What is CSR really about? How do the parties involved in CSR relate? Is the concept of CSR influenced by any kind of control? With the spread of CSR, its concept became unclear, attracting different meanings that emerged as the results of the forces involved. In order to better understand the concept, this article presents a multidisciplinary reading of CSR. For this purpose, the contributions of three areas of knowledge are used: Business, Law and Philosophy, focusing on Habermasian thought. Habermas’ Theory of Communicative Action makes it possible to take a critical view on CSR, extending its traditional meaning. This essay faces some important questions that surrounds CSR and brings attention to the necessity of consciously improve its conceptA responsabilidade social empresarial (RSE), em décadas recentes, ganhou amplo espaço na pesquisa acadêmica e na prática gerencial. Apesar de estar em evidência, seu conceito ainda suscita dúvidas. De que realmente se trata a RSE? Como se relacionam as partes envolvidas? Sujeita-se a ideia que representa a algum tipo de controle? Com a difusão da RSE, o conceito anuviou-se, adquirindo sentidos diversos, conforme as resultantes dos propósitos em questão. Visando-se compreendê-lo melhor, procede-se neste artigo a uma leitura multidisciplinar da RSE. Utiliza-se, para tanto, de aportes da Administração, do Direito e da Filosofia, com enfoque no pensamento habermasiano. A Teoria da Ação Comunicativa de Habermas possibilita que se direcione à RSE uma visão crítica, extensora das acepções que a ela usualmente se atribuem. Trata-se de pesquisa teórica, cujo objetivo é discutir a RSE reflexivamente e por ângulos variados. Aponta-se para a necessidade de investir na inteligibilidade conceitual da RSE.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2020-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/3815910.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n1p55Scientia Iuris; v. 24 n. 1 (2020); 55-772178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/38159/27715Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLebbos Favoreto, RicardoBannwart Júnior, Clodomiro JoséFrança Mazzei Nogueira, Arnaldo José2023-01-26T22:29:51Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38159Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-26T22:29:51Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reflecting on corporate social responsability: implications of a multidisciplinary reading
Problematizando o conceito de responsabilidade social empresarial: implicações de uma leitura multidisciplinar
title Reflecting on corporate social responsability: implications of a multidisciplinary reading
spellingShingle Reflecting on corporate social responsability: implications of a multidisciplinary reading
Lebbos Favoreto, Ricardo
Corporate Social Responsibility
Business Management
Law
Habermas
Theory of Communicative Action
Responsabilidade Social Empresarial
Gestão Empresarial
Direito
Habermas
Teoria da Ação Comunicativa
title_short Reflecting on corporate social responsability: implications of a multidisciplinary reading
title_full Reflecting on corporate social responsability: implications of a multidisciplinary reading
title_fullStr Reflecting on corporate social responsability: implications of a multidisciplinary reading
title_full_unstemmed Reflecting on corporate social responsability: implications of a multidisciplinary reading
title_sort Reflecting on corporate social responsability: implications of a multidisciplinary reading
author Lebbos Favoreto, Ricardo
author_facet Lebbos Favoreto, Ricardo
Bannwart Júnior, Clodomiro José
França Mazzei Nogueira, Arnaldo José
author_role author
author2 Bannwart Júnior, Clodomiro José
França Mazzei Nogueira, Arnaldo José
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lebbos Favoreto, Ricardo
Bannwart Júnior, Clodomiro José
França Mazzei Nogueira, Arnaldo José
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Corporate Social Responsibility
Business Management
Law
Habermas
Theory of Communicative Action
Responsabilidade Social Empresarial
Gestão Empresarial
Direito
Habermas
Teoria da Ação Comunicativa
topic Corporate Social Responsibility
Business Management
Law
Habermas
Theory of Communicative Action
Responsabilidade Social Empresarial
Gestão Empresarial
Direito
Habermas
Teoria da Ação Comunicativa
description In recent decades, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has gained headway in academic research and managerial practice. Although CSR has become notorious, its concept still raises doubts. What is CSR really about? How do the parties involved in CSR relate? Is the concept of CSR influenced by any kind of control? With the spread of CSR, its concept became unclear, attracting different meanings that emerged as the results of the forces involved. In order to better understand the concept, this article presents a multidisciplinary reading of CSR. For this purpose, the contributions of three areas of knowledge are used: Business, Law and Philosophy, focusing on Habermasian thought. Habermas’ Theory of Communicative Action makes it possible to take a critical view on CSR, extending its traditional meaning. This essay faces some important questions that surrounds CSR and brings attention to the necessity of consciously improve its concept
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/38159
10.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n1p55
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/38159
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n1p55
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/38159/27715
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 24 n. 1 (2020); 55-77
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306015607357440