Reflecting on corporate social responsability: implications of a multidisciplinary reading
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/38159 |
Resumo: | In recent decades, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has gained headway in academic research and managerial practice. Although CSR has become notorious, its concept still raises doubts. What is CSR really about? How do the parties involved in CSR relate? Is the concept of CSR influenced by any kind of control? With the spread of CSR, its concept became unclear, attracting different meanings that emerged as the results of the forces involved. In order to better understand the concept, this article presents a multidisciplinary reading of CSR. For this purpose, the contributions of three areas of knowledge are used: Business, Law and Philosophy, focusing on Habermasian thought. Habermas’ Theory of Communicative Action makes it possible to take a critical view on CSR, extending its traditional meaning. This essay faces some important questions that surrounds CSR and brings attention to the necessity of consciously improve its concept |
id |
UEL-6_0a76ccb0bd79d4853edfcc92302bb112 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38159 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Reflecting on corporate social responsability: implications of a multidisciplinary readingProblematizando o conceito de responsabilidade social empresarial: implicações de uma leitura multidisciplinarCorporate Social ResponsibilityBusiness ManagementLawHabermasTheory of Communicative ActionResponsabilidade Social EmpresarialGestão EmpresarialDireitoHabermasTeoria da Ação ComunicativaIn recent decades, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has gained headway in academic research and managerial practice. Although CSR has become notorious, its concept still raises doubts. What is CSR really about? How do the parties involved in CSR relate? Is the concept of CSR influenced by any kind of control? With the spread of CSR, its concept became unclear, attracting different meanings that emerged as the results of the forces involved. In order to better understand the concept, this article presents a multidisciplinary reading of CSR. For this purpose, the contributions of three areas of knowledge are used: Business, Law and Philosophy, focusing on Habermasian thought. Habermas’ Theory of Communicative Action makes it possible to take a critical view on CSR, extending its traditional meaning. This essay faces some important questions that surrounds CSR and brings attention to the necessity of consciously improve its conceptA responsabilidade social empresarial (RSE), em décadas recentes, ganhou amplo espaço na pesquisa acadêmica e na prática gerencial. Apesar de estar em evidência, seu conceito ainda suscita dúvidas. De que realmente se trata a RSE? Como se relacionam as partes envolvidas? Sujeita-se a ideia que representa a algum tipo de controle? Com a difusão da RSE, o conceito anuviou-se, adquirindo sentidos diversos, conforme as resultantes dos propósitos em questão. Visando-se compreendê-lo melhor, procede-se neste artigo a uma leitura multidisciplinar da RSE. Utiliza-se, para tanto, de aportes da Administração, do Direito e da Filosofia, com enfoque no pensamento habermasiano. A Teoria da Ação Comunicativa de Habermas possibilita que se direcione à RSE uma visão crítica, extensora das acepções que a ela usualmente se atribuem. Trata-se de pesquisa teórica, cujo objetivo é discutir a RSE reflexivamente e por ângulos variados. Aponta-se para a necessidade de investir na inteligibilidade conceitual da RSE.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2020-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/3815910.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n1p55Scientia Iuris; v. 24 n. 1 (2020); 55-772178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/38159/27715Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLebbos Favoreto, RicardoBannwart Júnior, Clodomiro JoséFrança Mazzei Nogueira, Arnaldo José2023-01-26T22:29:51Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38159Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-26T22:29:51Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reflecting on corporate social responsability: implications of a multidisciplinary reading Problematizando o conceito de responsabilidade social empresarial: implicações de uma leitura multidisciplinar |
title |
Reflecting on corporate social responsability: implications of a multidisciplinary reading |
spellingShingle |
Reflecting on corporate social responsability: implications of a multidisciplinary reading Lebbos Favoreto, Ricardo Corporate Social Responsibility Business Management Law Habermas Theory of Communicative Action Responsabilidade Social Empresarial Gestão Empresarial Direito Habermas Teoria da Ação Comunicativa |
title_short |
Reflecting on corporate social responsability: implications of a multidisciplinary reading |
title_full |
Reflecting on corporate social responsability: implications of a multidisciplinary reading |
title_fullStr |
Reflecting on corporate social responsability: implications of a multidisciplinary reading |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reflecting on corporate social responsability: implications of a multidisciplinary reading |
title_sort |
Reflecting on corporate social responsability: implications of a multidisciplinary reading |
author |
Lebbos Favoreto, Ricardo |
author_facet |
Lebbos Favoreto, Ricardo Bannwart Júnior, Clodomiro José França Mazzei Nogueira, Arnaldo José |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bannwart Júnior, Clodomiro José França Mazzei Nogueira, Arnaldo José |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lebbos Favoreto, Ricardo Bannwart Júnior, Clodomiro José França Mazzei Nogueira, Arnaldo José |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Corporate Social Responsibility Business Management Law Habermas Theory of Communicative Action Responsabilidade Social Empresarial Gestão Empresarial Direito Habermas Teoria da Ação Comunicativa |
topic |
Corporate Social Responsibility Business Management Law Habermas Theory of Communicative Action Responsabilidade Social Empresarial Gestão Empresarial Direito Habermas Teoria da Ação Comunicativa |
description |
In recent decades, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has gained headway in academic research and managerial practice. Although CSR has become notorious, its concept still raises doubts. What is CSR really about? How do the parties involved in CSR relate? Is the concept of CSR influenced by any kind of control? With the spread of CSR, its concept became unclear, attracting different meanings that emerged as the results of the forces involved. In order to better understand the concept, this article presents a multidisciplinary reading of CSR. For this purpose, the contributions of three areas of knowledge are used: Business, Law and Philosophy, focusing on Habermasian thought. Habermas’ Theory of Communicative Action makes it possible to take a critical view on CSR, extending its traditional meaning. This essay faces some important questions that surrounds CSR and brings attention to the necessity of consciously improve its concept |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-03-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/38159 10.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n1p55 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/38159 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2020v24n1p55 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/38159/27715 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 24 n. 1 (2020); 55-77 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306015607357440 |