Reviewing the role of the positive breach of contract in the theory of default

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Fabio Queiroz
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Andrade, Daniel de Pádua
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/30366
Resumo: Currently, in Brazilian law, the positive breach of contract is applied as an autonomous instrument to protect the obligatory interests indirectly linked to the provision. According to this majority view, the figures of absolute default and delay are restricted to the obligatory interests directly related to the provision. The contemporary re-reading of the law of obligations, however, reveals the inseparability between duties of protection and duties of provision. Based on the conceptual reformulation of default and performance in the Brazilian legal system, the present study proposes to review the role of positive breach of contract in the theory of default. This body of work is an investigation of the legal-theoretical aspect and of the legal-propositional type. This study uses, therefore, a qualitative methodology that, from secondary data and inductive reasoning, seeks to work normative and doctrinal bases for the formulation of new frameworks related to the matter. In this sense, instead of a third kind of default, it is suggested to consider the positive breach of contract as a theoretical reference to update and expand the institutes of absolute default and delay.
id UEL-6_66977c26294af47f80c2e69d3710ac78
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30366
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Reviewing the role of the positive breach of contract in the theory of defaultRevisitando o papel da violação positiva do contrato na teoria do inadimplementoViolação Positiva do ContratoTeoria do InadimplementoDireito das obrigaçõesCurrently, in Brazilian law, the positive breach of contract is applied as an autonomous instrument to protect the obligatory interests indirectly linked to the provision. According to this majority view, the figures of absolute default and delay are restricted to the obligatory interests directly related to the provision. The contemporary re-reading of the law of obligations, however, reveals the inseparability between duties of protection and duties of provision. Based on the conceptual reformulation of default and performance in the Brazilian legal system, the present study proposes to review the role of positive breach of contract in the theory of default. This body of work is an investigation of the legal-theoretical aspect and of the legal-propositional type. This study uses, therefore, a qualitative methodology that, from secondary data and inductive reasoning, seeks to work normative and doctrinal bases for the formulation of new frameworks related to the matter. In this sense, instead of a third kind of default, it is suggested to consider the positive breach of contract as a theoretical reference to update and expand the institutes of absolute default and delay.Atualmente, no direito brasileiro, prevalece a aplicação da violação positiva do contrato enquanto instrumento autônomo de tutela dos interesses obrigacionais indiretamente vinculados à prestação. Segundo esse entendimento majoritário, as figuras do inadimplemento absoluto e da mora restringem-se aos interesses obrigacionais diretamente relacionados com a prestação. A releitura contemporânea do direito das obrigações, entretanto, revela a indissociabilidade entre deveres de proteção e deveres de prestação. A partir da reformulação conceitual do (in)adimplemento no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro, o presente estudo propõe a revisão do papel da violação positiva do contrato na teoria do inadimplemento. Trata-se de uma investigação de vertente jurídico-teórica e de tipo propositivo. Nesse sentido, ao invés de terceira espécie de inadimplemento, sugere-se a consideração da violação positiva do contrato como referencial teórico de atualização e ampliação dos institutos do inadimplemento absoluto e da mora.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2018-03-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/3036610.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n1p258Scientia Iuris; v. 22 n. 1 (2018); 258-2822178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/30366/23357Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira, Fabio QueirozAndrade, Daniel de Pádua2018-04-04T18:29:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30366Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2018-04-04T18:29:49Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reviewing the role of the positive breach of contract in the theory of default
Revisitando o papel da violação positiva do contrato na teoria do inadimplemento
title Reviewing the role of the positive breach of contract in the theory of default
spellingShingle Reviewing the role of the positive breach of contract in the theory of default
Pereira, Fabio Queiroz
Violação Positiva do Contrato
Teoria do Inadimplemento
Direito das obrigações
title_short Reviewing the role of the positive breach of contract in the theory of default
title_full Reviewing the role of the positive breach of contract in the theory of default
title_fullStr Reviewing the role of the positive breach of contract in the theory of default
title_full_unstemmed Reviewing the role of the positive breach of contract in the theory of default
title_sort Reviewing the role of the positive breach of contract in the theory of default
author Pereira, Fabio Queiroz
author_facet Pereira, Fabio Queiroz
Andrade, Daniel de Pádua
author_role author
author2 Andrade, Daniel de Pádua
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Fabio Queiroz
Andrade, Daniel de Pádua
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Violação Positiva do Contrato
Teoria do Inadimplemento
Direito das obrigações
topic Violação Positiva do Contrato
Teoria do Inadimplemento
Direito das obrigações
description Currently, in Brazilian law, the positive breach of contract is applied as an autonomous instrument to protect the obligatory interests indirectly linked to the provision. According to this majority view, the figures of absolute default and delay are restricted to the obligatory interests directly related to the provision. The contemporary re-reading of the law of obligations, however, reveals the inseparability between duties of protection and duties of provision. Based on the conceptual reformulation of default and performance in the Brazilian legal system, the present study proposes to review the role of positive breach of contract in the theory of default. This body of work is an investigation of the legal-theoretical aspect and of the legal-propositional type. This study uses, therefore, a qualitative methodology that, from secondary data and inductive reasoning, seeks to work normative and doctrinal bases for the formulation of new frameworks related to the matter. In this sense, instead of a third kind of default, it is suggested to consider the positive breach of contract as a theoretical reference to update and expand the institutes of absolute default and delay.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/30366
10.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n1p258
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/30366
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n1p258
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/30366/23357
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 22 n. 1 (2018); 258-282
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306015216238592

Registros relacionados