CONSIDERATIONS ON THE CONCEPT OF ALPHABETIZATION AND LITERATENESS PRESENTED BY THE CHILDHOOD EDUCATORS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lucas, Maria Angélica Olivo Francisco
Data de Publicação: 2011
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/15563
Resumo: The objetive of this article is to expose and analyze the concepts of alphabetization and literateness presented by  the childhood educators. Based on Soares (1998-2004) we conceived alphabetization as a learning proccess and aquired skills necessary  to the act of reading and writing as a state and condition of the person who incorporates the social practice of reading and writing. Thus understanding that the terms of alphabetization and literateness are not synonyms. It refers to distinct processes that, nevertheless, occur in an interdepedent and inseparable ways.  The educators who took part in this research are people who have a higher education, who are working in public institutions which are envolved in childhood Education. The collecting  of the empirical data  was done through partly structured interviews. The set of answers presented through excerpts, allowed us to understand the way the teachers compreehend the relation  between the process of alphabetization and literateness. As the interviewed teachers spoke about alphabetization none of them mentioned the literateness process. Nevertheless, as they revealed how they understood the literateness process, the marjority related it to alphabetization, at one moment considering them synonyms, at another moment, confusing one with the other, at times, noticing the difference between both of them but not delimitating them clearly. Due to the profile of the people subjected to the interview it was possible to conclude that the curricular projects of the Pedagogy Courses recognize  the need to find another model for  initial and continued Education. We advocate that such a task requires a sistematic Education with a certain degree of depth which would allow us to understand the relation between the process of alphabetization and literateness and public policies committed to this kind of Education.
id UEM-11_8e867ff18701ff071c35bac355de439e
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/15563
network_acronym_str UEM-11
network_name_str Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling CONSIDERATIONS ON THE CONCEPT OF ALPHABETIZATION AND LITERATENESS PRESENTED BY THE CHILDHOOD EDUCATORSREFLEXÕES SOBRE OS CONCEITOS DE ALFABETIZAÇÃO E LETRAMENTO APRESENTADOS POR PROFESSORES DE EDUCAÇÃO INFANTILAlphabetizationLiteratenessChildhood educationTeacher’s educationAlfabetizaçãoLetramentoEducação infantilFormação de professoresThe objetive of this article is to expose and analyze the concepts of alphabetization and literateness presented by  the childhood educators. Based on Soares (1998-2004) we conceived alphabetization as a learning proccess and aquired skills necessary  to the act of reading and writing as a state and condition of the person who incorporates the social practice of reading and writing. Thus understanding that the terms of alphabetization and literateness are not synonyms. It refers to distinct processes that, nevertheless, occur in an interdepedent and inseparable ways.  The educators who took part in this research are people who have a higher education, who are working in public institutions which are envolved in childhood Education. The collecting  of the empirical data  was done through partly structured interviews. The set of answers presented through excerpts, allowed us to understand the way the teachers compreehend the relation  between the process of alphabetization and literateness. As the interviewed teachers spoke about alphabetization none of them mentioned the literateness process. Nevertheless, as they revealed how they understood the literateness process, the marjority related it to alphabetization, at one moment considering them synonyms, at another moment, confusing one with the other, at times, noticing the difference between both of them but not delimitating them clearly. Due to the profile of the people subjected to the interview it was possible to conclude that the curricular projects of the Pedagogy Courses recognize  the need to find another model for  initial and continued Education. We advocate that such a task requires a sistematic Education with a certain degree of depth which would allow us to understand the relation between the process of alphabetization and literateness and public policies committed to this kind of Education.O objetivo deste artigo é expor e analisar conceitos de alfabetização e letramento apresentados por professoras de educação infantil. Pautando-nos em Soares (1998; 2004), concebemos alfabetização como processo de aprendizagem de habilidades necessárias aos atos de ler e escrever e letramento como estado ou condição do sujeito que incorpora práticas sociais de leitura e escrita. Assim entendidos, os termos alfabetização e letramento não são sinônimos. Trata-se de processos distintos que, contudo, ocorrem de forma indissociável e interdependente. Participaram da pesquisa professores, em sua maioria com formação em nível superior, que atuam em instituições públicas de educação infantil. A coleta dos dados empíricos foi realizada por meio de entrevistas semi-estruturadas. O conjunto das respostas, apresentadas sob a forma de excertos, permitiu-nos compreender a forma como os professores compreendem a relação entre os processos de alfabetização e letramento. Ao falar sobre alfabetização, nenhuma professora mencionou o processo de letramento. No entanto, ao revelarem como entendem o processo de letramento,a maioria relacionou-o à alfabetização, ora considerando-os sinônimos, ora confundindo um com o outro, ora percebendo diferenças entre ambos, mas  não as delimitando com clareza. Em função do perfil dos sujeitos da pesquisa foi possível inferirmos acerca dos projetos curriculares dos cursos de Pedagogia, reconhecendo a necessidade de encontrarmos outro modelo de formação inicial e continuada. Defendemos que tal tarefa requer formação sistemática com grau de profundidade que permita compreender a relação entre os processos de alfabetização e letramento e políticas públicas comprometidas com esse tipo de formação.Universidade Estadual de Maringá2011-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/1556310.4025/tpe.v13i3.15563Teoria e Prática da Educação; v. 13 n. 3 (2010); 109-1192237-87071415-837Xreponame:Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/15563/8434Lucas, Maria Angélica Olivo Franciscoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-01-12T13:53:52Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/15563Revistahttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEducPUBhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/oaiteoriaepraticadaeducacao@gmail.com || teoriaepraticadaeducacao@gmail.com2237-87071415-837xopendoar:2023-01-12T10:59:22.605728Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv CONSIDERATIONS ON THE CONCEPT OF ALPHABETIZATION AND LITERATENESS PRESENTED BY THE CHILDHOOD EDUCATORS
REFLEXÕES SOBRE OS CONCEITOS DE ALFABETIZAÇÃO E LETRAMENTO APRESENTADOS POR PROFESSORES DE EDUCAÇÃO INFANTIL
title CONSIDERATIONS ON THE CONCEPT OF ALPHABETIZATION AND LITERATENESS PRESENTED BY THE CHILDHOOD EDUCATORS
spellingShingle CONSIDERATIONS ON THE CONCEPT OF ALPHABETIZATION AND LITERATENESS PRESENTED BY THE CHILDHOOD EDUCATORS
Lucas, Maria Angélica Olivo Francisco
Alphabetization
Literateness
Childhood education
Teacher’s education
Alfabetização
Letramento
Educação infantil
Formação de professores
title_short CONSIDERATIONS ON THE CONCEPT OF ALPHABETIZATION AND LITERATENESS PRESENTED BY THE CHILDHOOD EDUCATORS
title_full CONSIDERATIONS ON THE CONCEPT OF ALPHABETIZATION AND LITERATENESS PRESENTED BY THE CHILDHOOD EDUCATORS
title_fullStr CONSIDERATIONS ON THE CONCEPT OF ALPHABETIZATION AND LITERATENESS PRESENTED BY THE CHILDHOOD EDUCATORS
title_full_unstemmed CONSIDERATIONS ON THE CONCEPT OF ALPHABETIZATION AND LITERATENESS PRESENTED BY THE CHILDHOOD EDUCATORS
title_sort CONSIDERATIONS ON THE CONCEPT OF ALPHABETIZATION AND LITERATENESS PRESENTED BY THE CHILDHOOD EDUCATORS
author Lucas, Maria Angélica Olivo Francisco
author_facet Lucas, Maria Angélica Olivo Francisco
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lucas, Maria Angélica Olivo Francisco
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Alphabetization
Literateness
Childhood education
Teacher’s education
Alfabetização
Letramento
Educação infantil
Formação de professores
topic Alphabetization
Literateness
Childhood education
Teacher’s education
Alfabetização
Letramento
Educação infantil
Formação de professores
description The objetive of this article is to expose and analyze the concepts of alphabetization and literateness presented by  the childhood educators. Based on Soares (1998-2004) we conceived alphabetization as a learning proccess and aquired skills necessary  to the act of reading and writing as a state and condition of the person who incorporates the social practice of reading and writing. Thus understanding that the terms of alphabetization and literateness are not synonyms. It refers to distinct processes that, nevertheless, occur in an interdepedent and inseparable ways.  The educators who took part in this research are people who have a higher education, who are working in public institutions which are envolved in childhood Education. The collecting  of the empirical data  was done through partly structured interviews. The set of answers presented through excerpts, allowed us to understand the way the teachers compreehend the relation  between the process of alphabetization and literateness. As the interviewed teachers spoke about alphabetization none of them mentioned the literateness process. Nevertheless, as they revealed how they understood the literateness process, the marjority related it to alphabetization, at one moment considering them synonyms, at another moment, confusing one with the other, at times, noticing the difference between both of them but not delimitating them clearly. Due to the profile of the people subjected to the interview it was possible to conclude that the curricular projects of the Pedagogy Courses recognize  the need to find another model for  initial and continued Education. We advocate that such a task requires a sistematic Education with a certain degree of depth which would allow us to understand the relation between the process of alphabetization and literateness and public policies committed to this kind of Education.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-12-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/15563
10.4025/tpe.v13i3.15563
url https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/15563
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/tpe.v13i3.15563
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/15563/8434
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Teoria e Prática da Educação; v. 13 n. 3 (2010); 109-119
2237-8707
1415-837X
reponame:Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online)
collection Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv teoriaepraticadaeducacao@gmail.com || teoriaepraticadaeducacao@gmail.com
_version_ 1792207155998228480