Religious belief in Peirce´s semiotic perspective

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bortolotti, Ricardo Gião
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/24125
Resumo: Current paper presents the relationships between beliefs, specifically religious ones, and the Peirce’s theory of interpretants. It is assumed that religious belief emphasizes the emotional aspect of faithful, preventing criticism and change of habit. According to the author, the nature of cognition is contrary to the determination of this kind of belief since it is based on the method and fallibility of hypotheses. It is not enough for the method to deduce its consequences but seeks the inductive verification of their results in the long run and through the community of beings who thinks through signs. The problem of religious belief is the acceptance of a transcendent world and intuition which guides behavior. The vague idea of God is not submitted to scientific hypotheses but, engendered by religious systems, it creates signs whose emotional appeal is evident, redirecting it to its own target principles. Therefore, is repeats the success achieved in the past by dogmas, which were effective to appease the anguish of the believer and reproduce order. Knowledge should not have any boundaries because it is grounded on the method and cognition of reality.
id UEM-3_5471dd14d299d1cf5b5a189200c666a5
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/24125
network_acronym_str UEM-3
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Religious belief in Peirce´s semiotic perspectiveA crença religiosa sob a perspectiva semiótica de PeircescienceemotioninterpretantssacredsignsfeelingsciênciaemoçãointerpretantessagradosentimentossignoFilosofiaCurrent paper presents the relationships between beliefs, specifically religious ones, and the Peirce’s theory of interpretants. It is assumed that religious belief emphasizes the emotional aspect of faithful, preventing criticism and change of habit. According to the author, the nature of cognition is contrary to the determination of this kind of belief since it is based on the method and fallibility of hypotheses. It is not enough for the method to deduce its consequences but seeks the inductive verification of their results in the long run and through the community of beings who thinks through signs. The problem of religious belief is the acceptance of a transcendent world and intuition which guides behavior. The vague idea of God is not submitted to scientific hypotheses but, engendered by religious systems, it creates signs whose emotional appeal is evident, redirecting it to its own target principles. Therefore, is repeats the success achieved in the past by dogmas, which were effective to appease the anguish of the believer and reproduce order. Knowledge should not have any boundaries because it is grounded on the method and cognition of reality.Esse artigo pretende apresentar algumas relações entre as crenças, especificamente a religiosa, e a teoria dos interpretantes de Peirce. Parte-se, pois, do pressuposto de que a crença religiosa enfatiza o aspecto emocional do fiel, impedindo a crítica e a mudança de hábito. Segundo o autor, a natureza da cognição é contrária à determinação desse tipo de crença, uma vez que se fundamenta no método e no falibilismo de nossas hipóteses. Tal método não se contenta em deduzir suas consequências, mas busca, ao longo do tempo, e por intermédio da comunidade de seres que pensam por meio de signos, a verificação indutiva de seus resultados. O problema da crença religiosa está na aceitação de um mundo transcendente e na intuição que servem de orientação para a conduta. A ideia de Deus, sendo vaga, não se submete aos critérios de verdade das hipóteses científicas, mas engendrada pelos sistemas religiosos cria signos cujo apelo emocional é evidente, reorientando-os para finalidades próprias. Repete, portanto, o sucesso que o dogma alcançou em fórmulas passadas e que foram eficazes para aplacar a angústia do crente e reproduzir a ordem. O conhecimento não deve ter fronteiras, pois alicerçado no método e na cognição do real. Universidade Estadual De Maringá2014-12-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/2412510.4025/actascihumansoc.v36i2.24125Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; Vol 36 No 2 (2014); 235-244Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; v. 36 n. 2 (2014); 235-2441807-86561679-7361reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/24125/pdf_37Bortolotti, Ricardo Giãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-12-05T14:07:39Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/24125Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/indexPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/oai||actahuman@uem.br1807-86561679-7361opendoar:2014-12-05T14:07:39Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Religious belief in Peirce´s semiotic perspective
A crença religiosa sob a perspectiva semiótica de Peirce
title Religious belief in Peirce´s semiotic perspective
spellingShingle Religious belief in Peirce´s semiotic perspective
Bortolotti, Ricardo Gião
science
emotion
interpretants
sacred
signs
feelings
ciência
emoção
interpretantes
sagrado
sentimentos
signo
Filosofia
title_short Religious belief in Peirce´s semiotic perspective
title_full Religious belief in Peirce´s semiotic perspective
title_fullStr Religious belief in Peirce´s semiotic perspective
title_full_unstemmed Religious belief in Peirce´s semiotic perspective
title_sort Religious belief in Peirce´s semiotic perspective
author Bortolotti, Ricardo Gião
author_facet Bortolotti, Ricardo Gião
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bortolotti, Ricardo Gião
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv science
emotion
interpretants
sacred
signs
feelings
ciência
emoção
interpretantes
sagrado
sentimentos
signo
Filosofia
topic science
emotion
interpretants
sacred
signs
feelings
ciência
emoção
interpretantes
sagrado
sentimentos
signo
Filosofia
description Current paper presents the relationships between beliefs, specifically religious ones, and the Peirce’s theory of interpretants. It is assumed that religious belief emphasizes the emotional aspect of faithful, preventing criticism and change of habit. According to the author, the nature of cognition is contrary to the determination of this kind of belief since it is based on the method and fallibility of hypotheses. It is not enough for the method to deduce its consequences but seeks the inductive verification of their results in the long run and through the community of beings who thinks through signs. The problem of religious belief is the acceptance of a transcendent world and intuition which guides behavior. The vague idea of God is not submitted to scientific hypotheses but, engendered by religious systems, it creates signs whose emotional appeal is evident, redirecting it to its own target principles. Therefore, is repeats the success achieved in the past by dogmas, which were effective to appease the anguish of the believer and reproduce order. Knowledge should not have any boundaries because it is grounded on the method and cognition of reality.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/24125
10.4025/actascihumansoc.v36i2.24125
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/24125
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v36i2.24125
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/24125/pdf_37
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual De Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual De Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; Vol 36 No 2 (2014); 235-244
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; v. 36 n. 2 (2014); 235-244
1807-8656
1679-7361
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||actahuman@uem.br
_version_ 1799317508820303872