Estimation of error followed by knowledge of results in a moderate or high frequency enhances motor learning and may avoid extrinsic feedback dependence
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/58154 |
Resumo: | The present study aimed to analyze how different schedules combining error estimation and relative frequency of extrinsic feedback affects motor learning. Fifty-two undergraduate students (30 males, 22 females) aged 18 to 35 years old (M = 21.15, SD = 2.97), all novices in the task, practiced a force-production task with different combinations between error estimation and relative frequency of knowledge of results. Four experimental conditions were compared: no error estimation with feedback after every trial; no error estimation with feedback every two trials; error estimation following by feedback after every trial-and-error estimation following feedback every two trials. The absolute force error analysis revealed a significant main effect for both feedback frequency [F(1, 76) = 4.209, p = 0.044, ηp2 = 0.52] and error estimation [F(1, 76) = 7.483, p = 0.008, ηp2 = 0.77]. The constant force error analysis did not reveal a significant main effect for Error Estimation [F(1, 76) = 2.323, p = 0.132, ηp2 = 0.37], but did for Feedback Frequency [F(1, 76) = 8.481, p = 0.005, ηp2 = 0.83]. Results showed superior learning of groups that combined error estimation following receiving feedback, regardless of feedback frequency. The association between error estimation and relative frequency of extrinsic feedback (high or moderate) seems to favor the development of error-detection mechanism, thus avoiding the effects of extrinsic feedback dependence, and consequently enhancing learning. |
id |
UEM-9_1e57aa6c8870a6246d0ab3ac03406b79 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/58154 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-9 |
network_name_str |
Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Estimation of error followed by knowledge of results in a moderate or high frequency enhances motor learning and may avoid extrinsic feedback dependenceEstimativa de erro seguida por conhecimento dos resultados em frequência moderada ou alta melhora a aprendizagem motora e pode evitar a dependência de feedback extrínsecoMotor learningFeedbackError estimationKnowledge of resultsAprendizagem motoraFeedbackEstimativa de erroConhecimento de resultadosThe present study aimed to analyze how different schedules combining error estimation and relative frequency of extrinsic feedback affects motor learning. Fifty-two undergraduate students (30 males, 22 females) aged 18 to 35 years old (M = 21.15, SD = 2.97), all novices in the task, practiced a force-production task with different combinations between error estimation and relative frequency of knowledge of results. Four experimental conditions were compared: no error estimation with feedback after every trial; no error estimation with feedback every two trials; error estimation following by feedback after every trial-and-error estimation following feedback every two trials. The absolute force error analysis revealed a significant main effect for both feedback frequency [F(1, 76) = 4.209, p = 0.044, ηp2 = 0.52] and error estimation [F(1, 76) = 7.483, p = 0.008, ηp2 = 0.77]. The constant force error analysis did not reveal a significant main effect for Error Estimation [F(1, 76) = 2.323, p = 0.132, ηp2 = 0.37], but did for Feedback Frequency [F(1, 76) = 8.481, p = 0.005, ηp2 = 0.83]. Results showed superior learning of groups that combined error estimation following receiving feedback, regardless of feedback frequency. The association between error estimation and relative frequency of extrinsic feedback (high or moderate) seems to favor the development of error-detection mechanism, thus avoiding the effects of extrinsic feedback dependence, and consequently enhancing learning.O presente estudo teve como objetivo analisar como diferentes esquemas combinando estimativa de erro e frequência relativa de feedback extrínseco afetam a aprendizagem motora. Cinquenta e dois estudantes de graduação (30 homens, 22 mulheres) com idades entre 18 e 35 anos (M = 21,15, DP = 2,97), todos novatos na tarefa, praticaram uma habilidade de produção de força com diferentes combinações entre estimativa de erro e frequência relativa de conhecimento dos resultados. Quatro condições experimentais foram comparadas: 1) nenhuma estimativa de erro com feedback após cada tentativa; 2) nenhuma estimativa de erro com feedback a cada duas tentativas; 3) estimativa de erro seguida de feedback após cada tentativa e 4) estimativa de tentativa após feedback a cada duas tentativas. A análise do erro absoluto da força revelou efeito significante para a frequência de feedback [F(1, 76) = 4.209, p = 0.044, ηp2 = 0.52] e estimativa de erro [F(1, 76) = 7.483, p = 0.008, ηp2 = 0.77]. A análise do erro constante da força não revelou diferenças significantes para estimativa de erro [F(1, 76) = 2.323, p = 0.132, ηp2 = 0.37], mas para a frequência de feedback [F(1, 76) = 8.481, p = 0.005, ηp2 = 0.83]. Os resultados mostraram aprendizagem superior dos grupos que combinaram estimativa de erro após receber feedback, independentemente da frequência relativa apresentada. A associação entre estimativa de erro e frequência relativa de feedback extrínseco (alto ou moderado) parece favorecer o desenvolvimento de mecanismos de detecção de erros, evitando os efeitos da dependência de feedback extrínseco e, consequentemente, potencializando o aprendizado.Department of Physical Education - State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá-PR, Brazil2022-02-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/5815410.4025/jphyseduc.v33i1.3320Journal of Physical Education; Vol 33 No 1 (2022): Journal of Physical Education; e-3320Journal of Physical Education; Vol. 33 Núm. 1 (2022): Journal of Physical Education; e-3320Journal of Physical Education; v. 33 n. 1 (2022): Journal of Physical Education; e-33202448-2455reponame:Journal of Physical Education (Maringá)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/58154/751375153715Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Physical Education https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Souza Fonseca, FabianoFigueiredo, Lucas SavassiAndrade da Silva Lima, Marílyada Silva Maciel, JaimeGilo da Silva, DrumondVitor Alves Pereira Fialho, João2022-05-11T12:43:00Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/58154Revistahttp://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revdef@uem.br2448-24552448-2455opendoar:2022-05-11T12:43Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Estimation of error followed by knowledge of results in a moderate or high frequency enhances motor learning and may avoid extrinsic feedback dependence Estimativa de erro seguida por conhecimento dos resultados em frequência moderada ou alta melhora a aprendizagem motora e pode evitar a dependência de feedback extrínseco |
title |
Estimation of error followed by knowledge of results in a moderate or high frequency enhances motor learning and may avoid extrinsic feedback dependence |
spellingShingle |
Estimation of error followed by knowledge of results in a moderate or high frequency enhances motor learning and may avoid extrinsic feedback dependence de Souza Fonseca, Fabiano Motor learning Feedback Error estimation Knowledge of results Aprendizagem motora Feedback Estimativa de erro Conhecimento de resultados |
title_short |
Estimation of error followed by knowledge of results in a moderate or high frequency enhances motor learning and may avoid extrinsic feedback dependence |
title_full |
Estimation of error followed by knowledge of results in a moderate or high frequency enhances motor learning and may avoid extrinsic feedback dependence |
title_fullStr |
Estimation of error followed by knowledge of results in a moderate or high frequency enhances motor learning and may avoid extrinsic feedback dependence |
title_full_unstemmed |
Estimation of error followed by knowledge of results in a moderate or high frequency enhances motor learning and may avoid extrinsic feedback dependence |
title_sort |
Estimation of error followed by knowledge of results in a moderate or high frequency enhances motor learning and may avoid extrinsic feedback dependence |
author |
de Souza Fonseca, Fabiano |
author_facet |
de Souza Fonseca, Fabiano Figueiredo, Lucas Savassi Andrade da Silva Lima, Marílya da Silva Maciel, Jaime Gilo da Silva, Drumond Vitor Alves Pereira Fialho, João |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Figueiredo, Lucas Savassi Andrade da Silva Lima, Marílya da Silva Maciel, Jaime Gilo da Silva, Drumond Vitor Alves Pereira Fialho, João |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Souza Fonseca, Fabiano Figueiredo, Lucas Savassi Andrade da Silva Lima, Marílya da Silva Maciel, Jaime Gilo da Silva, Drumond Vitor Alves Pereira Fialho, João |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Motor learning Feedback Error estimation Knowledge of results Aprendizagem motora Feedback Estimativa de erro Conhecimento de resultados |
topic |
Motor learning Feedback Error estimation Knowledge of results Aprendizagem motora Feedback Estimativa de erro Conhecimento de resultados |
description |
The present study aimed to analyze how different schedules combining error estimation and relative frequency of extrinsic feedback affects motor learning. Fifty-two undergraduate students (30 males, 22 females) aged 18 to 35 years old (M = 21.15, SD = 2.97), all novices in the task, practiced a force-production task with different combinations between error estimation and relative frequency of knowledge of results. Four experimental conditions were compared: no error estimation with feedback after every trial; no error estimation with feedback every two trials; error estimation following by feedback after every trial-and-error estimation following feedback every two trials. The absolute force error analysis revealed a significant main effect for both feedback frequency [F(1, 76) = 4.209, p = 0.044, ηp2 = 0.52] and error estimation [F(1, 76) = 7.483, p = 0.008, ηp2 = 0.77]. The constant force error analysis did not reveal a significant main effect for Error Estimation [F(1, 76) = 2.323, p = 0.132, ηp2 = 0.37], but did for Feedback Frequency [F(1, 76) = 8.481, p = 0.005, ηp2 = 0.83]. Results showed superior learning of groups that combined error estimation following receiving feedback, regardless of feedback frequency. The association between error estimation and relative frequency of extrinsic feedback (high or moderate) seems to favor the development of error-detection mechanism, thus avoiding the effects of extrinsic feedback dependence, and consequently enhancing learning. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/58154 10.4025/jphyseduc.v33i1.3320 |
url |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/58154 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/jphyseduc.v33i1.3320 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/58154/751375153715 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Physical Education https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Physical Education https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Department of Physical Education - State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá-PR, Brazil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Department of Physical Education - State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá-PR, Brazil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Physical Education; Vol 33 No 1 (2022): Journal of Physical Education; e-3320 Journal of Physical Education; Vol. 33 Núm. 1 (2022): Journal of Physical Education; e-3320 Journal of Physical Education; v. 33 n. 1 (2022): Journal of Physical Education; e-3320 2448-2455 reponame:Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) |
collection |
Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revdef@uem.br |
_version_ |
1754732546554331136 |