Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Therapy on whole Salivary Flow in Patients with Xerostomia and Healthy Adults

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chhugani, Satish
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Chhugani, Gunjan Khatwani, Pratap, Abhishek Sahu Vishwa, Adwani, Lokesh, Jain, Supreet, Patil, Santosh Rayagouda
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/573
Resumo: Objective: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) therapy on whole salivary flow in patients with xerostomia and healthy adults. Material and Methods:  Thirty subjects with a history of xerostomia and subjects with unstimulated salivary flow equal to or less than 0.5 ml in 5 min were included in the study group, and 30 healthy subjects were included in the control group. Low forced spitting unstimulated saliva was collected for five minutes in a test tube fitted with a funnel. Then electrode pads of the TENS unit were applied bilaterally on skin overlying the parotid glands and at optimal intensity, stimulated saliva was collected for 5 minutes with the same method in a separate graduated test tube. The salivary flow rate (per minute) was calculated by dividing the amount of collected saliva (volume in mL) by the duration of collection period (5 minutes) and the salivary flow rates prior and after electrostimulation were compared for both groups. The Student’s t-test (unpaired and paired) was performed for group-wise comparisons. Results: In study group, the mean unstimulated salivary flow rate was 0.07 ± 0.01 mL/min. There was an 85.71% increase in salivary flow (0.13 ± 0.03 mL/min) during the TENS application and the difference was highly significant (p<0.001). In control group, the mean unstimulated salivary flow rate was 0.37 ± 0.07 mL/min. There was a 21.62% increase in salivary flow (0.45 ± 0.07 mL/min) during the TENS application and the difference was highly significant (p<0.001). An increase in mean salivary flow rate both in males and females after TENS application in both groups (p<0.001) was noted. The difference between unstimulated, stimulated and mean difference in salivary flow rate between males and females was not statistically significant in both groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: TENS can be an effective therapy in increasing whole salivary flow rates in patients with xerostomia.
id UEPB-4_d793c19d9768f84ee36d78532aaffcf7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/573
network_acronym_str UEPB-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Therapy on whole Salivary Flow in Patients with Xerostomia and Healthy AdultsSalivaTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationXerostomiaObjective: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) therapy on whole salivary flow in patients with xerostomia and healthy adults. Material and Methods:  Thirty subjects with a history of xerostomia and subjects with unstimulated salivary flow equal to or less than 0.5 ml in 5 min were included in the study group, and 30 healthy subjects were included in the control group. Low forced spitting unstimulated saliva was collected for five minutes in a test tube fitted with a funnel. Then electrode pads of the TENS unit were applied bilaterally on skin overlying the parotid glands and at optimal intensity, stimulated saliva was collected for 5 minutes with the same method in a separate graduated test tube. The salivary flow rate (per minute) was calculated by dividing the amount of collected saliva (volume in mL) by the duration of collection period (5 minutes) and the salivary flow rates prior and after electrostimulation were compared for both groups. The Student’s t-test (unpaired and paired) was performed for group-wise comparisons. Results: In study group, the mean unstimulated salivary flow rate was 0.07 ± 0.01 mL/min. There was an 85.71% increase in salivary flow (0.13 ± 0.03 mL/min) during the TENS application and the difference was highly significant (p<0.001). In control group, the mean unstimulated salivary flow rate was 0.37 ± 0.07 mL/min. There was a 21.62% increase in salivary flow (0.45 ± 0.07 mL/min) during the TENS application and the difference was highly significant (p<0.001). An increase in mean salivary flow rate both in males and females after TENS application in both groups (p<0.001) was noted. The difference between unstimulated, stimulated and mean difference in salivary flow rate between males and females was not statistically significant in both groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: TENS can be an effective therapy in increasing whole salivary flow rates in patients with xerostomia.EDUEPB - EDITORA DA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DA PARAÍBA2021-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/573Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; Vol. 21 (2021); e0008Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; v. 21 (2021); e00081983-46321519-0501reponame:Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)instacron:UEPBenghttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/573/301Copyright (c) 2021 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integradahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessChhugani, Satish Chhugani, Gunjan Khatwani Pratap, Abhishek Sahu Vishwa Adwani, Lokesh Jain, SupreetPatil, Santosh Rayagouda 2021-11-02T19:07:17Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/573Revistahttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/PUBhttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/oaipboci.editoria@gmail.com || alessandrouepb@gmail.com1983-46321519-0501opendoar:2021-11-02T19:07:17Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) - Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Therapy on whole Salivary Flow in Patients with Xerostomia and Healthy Adults
title Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Therapy on whole Salivary Flow in Patients with Xerostomia and Healthy Adults
spellingShingle Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Therapy on whole Salivary Flow in Patients with Xerostomia and Healthy Adults
Chhugani, Satish
Saliva
Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
Xerostomia
title_short Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Therapy on whole Salivary Flow in Patients with Xerostomia and Healthy Adults
title_full Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Therapy on whole Salivary Flow in Patients with Xerostomia and Healthy Adults
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Therapy on whole Salivary Flow in Patients with Xerostomia and Healthy Adults
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Therapy on whole Salivary Flow in Patients with Xerostomia and Healthy Adults
title_sort Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Therapy on whole Salivary Flow in Patients with Xerostomia and Healthy Adults
author Chhugani, Satish
author_facet Chhugani, Satish
Chhugani, Gunjan Khatwani
Pratap, Abhishek Sahu Vishwa
Adwani, Lokesh
Jain, Supreet
Patil, Santosh Rayagouda
author_role author
author2 Chhugani, Gunjan Khatwani
Pratap, Abhishek Sahu Vishwa
Adwani, Lokesh
Jain, Supreet
Patil, Santosh Rayagouda
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chhugani, Satish
Chhugani, Gunjan Khatwani
Pratap, Abhishek Sahu Vishwa
Adwani, Lokesh
Jain, Supreet
Patil, Santosh Rayagouda
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Saliva
Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
Xerostomia
topic Saliva
Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
Xerostomia
description Objective: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) therapy on whole salivary flow in patients with xerostomia and healthy adults. Material and Methods:  Thirty subjects with a history of xerostomia and subjects with unstimulated salivary flow equal to or less than 0.5 ml in 5 min were included in the study group, and 30 healthy subjects were included in the control group. Low forced spitting unstimulated saliva was collected for five minutes in a test tube fitted with a funnel. Then electrode pads of the TENS unit were applied bilaterally on skin overlying the parotid glands and at optimal intensity, stimulated saliva was collected for 5 minutes with the same method in a separate graduated test tube. The salivary flow rate (per minute) was calculated by dividing the amount of collected saliva (volume in mL) by the duration of collection period (5 minutes) and the salivary flow rates prior and after electrostimulation were compared for both groups. The Student’s t-test (unpaired and paired) was performed for group-wise comparisons. Results: In study group, the mean unstimulated salivary flow rate was 0.07 ± 0.01 mL/min. There was an 85.71% increase in salivary flow (0.13 ± 0.03 mL/min) during the TENS application and the difference was highly significant (p<0.001). In control group, the mean unstimulated salivary flow rate was 0.37 ± 0.07 mL/min. There was a 21.62% increase in salivary flow (0.45 ± 0.07 mL/min) during the TENS application and the difference was highly significant (p<0.001). An increase in mean salivary flow rate both in males and females after TENS application in both groups (p<0.001) was noted. The difference between unstimulated, stimulated and mean difference in salivary flow rate between males and females was not statistically significant in both groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: TENS can be an effective therapy in increasing whole salivary flow rates in patients with xerostomia.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/573
url https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/573
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/573/301
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUEPB - EDITORA DA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DA PARAÍBA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUEPB - EDITORA DA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DA PARAÍBA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; Vol. 21 (2021); e0008
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; v. 21 (2021); e0008
1983-4632
1519-0501
reponame:Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)
instacron:UEPB
instname_str Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)
instacron_str UEPB
institution UEPB
reponame_str Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online)
collection Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) - Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pboci.editoria@gmail.com || alessandrouepb@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387862287122432