A uniformização da jurisprudência nos juizados especiais no modelo constitucional de processo como condição para o acesso efetivo à justiça e o direito ao processo justo

• Autor(a) principal: Soares, Fábio Costa
• Data de Publicação: 2023
• Outros Autores: [e-mail]
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ
• Texto Completo: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/20034
• topic: Uniformization of jurisprudence; Constitutional model of process; Effective access to justice; Right to a fair trial; Legal certainty; Isonomy; Right to trial within a reasonable time; Legitimacy of the judicial function; Efficiency; Cost reduction; Consensual solution; Precedent; Common law; Civil law; Binding effect; Small claims courts; Appeal courts; Incident of resolution of repetitive demands; Incident of Assumption of Competence; Standardization of interpretation of law; Preliminary injunction; Monocratic judgment; Absolute competence; Persuasive effect; Special appeal; Superior Justice Tribunal; Uniformização da jurisprudência; Modelo constitucional de processo; Acesso efetivo à justiça; Direito ao processo justo; Segurança jurídica; Isonomia; Duração razoável do processo; Legitimidade da função judicial; Eficiência; Redução dos custos; Solução consensual; Precedentes; Common law; Civil law; Efeito vinculativo; Juizados especiais; Turmas recursais; Incidente de resolução de demandas repetitivas; Incidente de assunção de competência; Uniformização de interpretação de lei; Improcedência liminar; Julgamento monocrático; Competência absoluta; Efeito persuasivo; Recurso especial; Superior Tribunal de Justiça; CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL PENAL

The thesis supports the need to standardize jurisprudence in brasilian small claims courts based on the theoretical framework of the constitutionalization of procedural law and the constitutional model of procedure, as a condition for effective access to justice and to make effective the right to a fair trial, unattainable in an environment of legal uncertainty that generates unequal treatment for injured right holders, or threatened with injury, who are in fact identical situations, or similar and regulated by the same normative text. The study on the creation of the system of precedents in brasilian law by Civil Procedure Code enacted in 2015, the influence of New York small claims courts and the causes of dispersion of jurisprudence in brasilian small claims courts made it possible to develop the foundations for the standardization of jurisprudence in that microsystem in the constitutional model of process. Legal certainty, isonomy, right to trial within a reasonable time, effective access to justice, the legitimacy of the judicial function through public confidence in the courts, the efficiency of the justice system and cost reduction, in addition to encouraging a consensual solution, as an alternative to trial, are the constitutional foundations for the creation and use of instruments and mechanisms aimed at eliminating the divergence of jurisprudence in the organs of the structured judicial system for the process and judgment of causes of limited economic value and without factual complexity, making it possible to achieve stability, integrity and consistency of jurisprudence, without which no whether people can be guaranteed effective access to justice and the realization of the right to a fair trial.