Ecotoxicidade aguda, crônica e genotoxicidade de solo contaminado por óleo lubrificante usado e biorremediado para Eisenia andrei.

• Autor(a) principal: Guimarães, Sanye Soroldoni
• Data de Publicação: 2012
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ
• Texto Completo: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/10926
• topic: Environmental Engineering; Ecotoxicology; Eisenia andrei; Micronuclei; Hydrocarbons extraction techniques; Bioremediation; Biomass reduction; Engenharia Ambiental; Ecotoxicologia; Eisenia Andrei; Micronúcleo; Técnicas de extração de hidrocarbonetos; Biorremediação; Redução da biomassa; CNPQ::ENGENHARIAS

The aim of this study was to evaluate this acute toxicity, chronic and genotoxicity on E. andrei caused by freshly contaminated soil with used lubricating oil and after bioremediation by different strategies, after 22 months, and alongside ecotoxicity study, we conducted a comparative study of three methods of extraction and HTP HPA soil for chromatographic analysis. Comparison of extraction techniques for HTP showed that the technique of accelerated solvent extraction-ASE had the best recovery of n-alkanes, whereas for fractions and HRP MCNR soxhlet techniques and microwave-MARS and no significant differences were better than ASE. For HPA, the soxhlet extraction technique showed the best recovery in all soils. The mortality test showed , at the 14th day, growing mortality rates of 10 ± 6% 20 ± 0%, 73 ± 25% 93 ± 12% and 100 ± 0% for samples CONT (ground control without contamination artificial ), BIOS (soil contaminated with 5% of OLU and bioremediated for biostimulation) BIOA1 (soil contaminated with 5% of OLU and bioremediated for biostimulation + bioaugmentation by adding 10% of MSW matured) and BIOA2 (soil contaminated with 5% bioremediated of OLU and for biostimulation + bioaugmentation by adding 10% of MSW semi-matured) and OLU (soil contaminated with 5% OLU), respectively. At the 28th day, however, OLU BIOS and mortality rates were 97% ± 6% and 100% ± 0%, respectively, values which are significantly higher than CONT. Anatomical deformations have been observed in individuals kept in BIOS and OLU, as well as decreased biomass in all samples, suggesting chronic effects. The reproduction test, at the 28th day, were found large quantities of juveniles in bioremediated soils and freshly contaminated soil. However, at the 56th day there was a decrease of these forms and control (CONT) exhibited a greater amount of juveniles. The >test> density and cell viability test showed to be a sensitive indicator for chronic toxicity in soils having decrease BIOS and OLU compared to CONT with significant differences (p <0.05). No micronuclei were observed in soils under study. This observation reinforces the need for ecotoxicity tests to assess the true efficacy of treatment technologies.