Merit is not for all: a perception of black managers about their proccess of professional rising
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Organizações & Sociedade (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/23280 |
Resumo: | Based on a research conducted in Belo Horizonte, with 25 black managers, this article analyzes how the professional rising discourse is based on the idea of personal merit. Considering this central problem and authors such as Pierre Bourdieu, Jessé Souza and Carlos Hasenbalg, the research analyzed the assumptions, functionalities and productive character that the idea of personal merit assumes in the interviewees' discourse. The results obtained point to a perception about the professional rising process with strong meritocratic components, a perception that ignores or minimizes the social, emotional, moral and economic preconditions that interfere in the differential performance obtained by individuals. Moreover, this perception implies a disqualification of any argument that reinforces the racial barriers in their professional rising processes, which contributes to conceal the political, economic and social dimension of racism in the country. |
id |
UFBA-4_6a22cfe0927b6e3a5dd139b26ac2c3e7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/23280 |
network_acronym_str |
UFBA-4 |
network_name_str |
Organizações & Sociedade (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Merit is not for all: a perception of black managers about their proccess of professional risingMerit. Race. Career mobility.Based on a research conducted in Belo Horizonte, with 25 black managers, this article analyzes how the professional rising discourse is based on the idea of personal merit. Considering this central problem and authors such as Pierre Bourdieu, Jessé Souza and Carlos Hasenbalg, the research analyzed the assumptions, functionalities and productive character that the idea of personal merit assumes in the interviewees' discourse. The results obtained point to a perception about the professional rising process with strong meritocratic components, a perception that ignores or minimizes the social, emotional, moral and economic preconditions that interfere in the differential performance obtained by individuals. Moreover, this perception implies a disqualification of any argument that reinforces the racial barriers in their professional rising processes, which contributes to conceal the political, economic and social dimension of racism in the country.Núcleo de Pós-graduação em Administração, Escola de Administração, UFBA2018-10-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/23280Organizações & Sociedade; Vol. 25 No. 87 (2018)Organizações & Sociedade; v. 25 n. 87 (2018)1984-92301413-585Xreponame:Organizações & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)instacron:UFBAporhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/23280/16844https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/23280/16934Copyright (c) 2018 Organizações & Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, Andrea AlcioneDias, Rafaela Cyrino Peralva2020-01-17T16:53:37Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/23280Revistahttp://www.revistaoes.ufba.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcandidab@ufba.br||revistaoes@ufba.br1984-92301413-585Xopendoar:2020-01-17T16:53:37Organizações & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Merit is not for all: a perception of black managers about their proccess of professional rising |
title |
Merit is not for all: a perception of black managers about their proccess of professional rising |
spellingShingle |
Merit is not for all: a perception of black managers about their proccess of professional rising Souza, Andrea Alcione Merit. Race. Career mobility. |
title_short |
Merit is not for all: a perception of black managers about their proccess of professional rising |
title_full |
Merit is not for all: a perception of black managers about their proccess of professional rising |
title_fullStr |
Merit is not for all: a perception of black managers about their proccess of professional rising |
title_full_unstemmed |
Merit is not for all: a perception of black managers about their proccess of professional rising |
title_sort |
Merit is not for all: a perception of black managers about their proccess of professional rising |
author |
Souza, Andrea Alcione |
author_facet |
Souza, Andrea Alcione Dias, Rafaela Cyrino Peralva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Dias, Rafaela Cyrino Peralva |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Andrea Alcione Dias, Rafaela Cyrino Peralva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Merit. Race. Career mobility. |
topic |
Merit. Race. Career mobility. |
description |
Based on a research conducted in Belo Horizonte, with 25 black managers, this article analyzes how the professional rising discourse is based on the idea of personal merit. Considering this central problem and authors such as Pierre Bourdieu, Jessé Souza and Carlos Hasenbalg, the research analyzed the assumptions, functionalities and productive character that the idea of personal merit assumes in the interviewees' discourse. The results obtained point to a perception about the professional rising process with strong meritocratic components, a perception that ignores or minimizes the social, emotional, moral and economic preconditions that interfere in the differential performance obtained by individuals. Moreover, this perception implies a disqualification of any argument that reinforces the racial barriers in their professional rising processes, which contributes to conceal the political, economic and social dimension of racism in the country. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/23280 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/23280 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/23280/16844 https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/23280/16934 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Organizações & Sociedade info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Organizações & Sociedade |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Pós-graduação em Administração, Escola de Administração, UFBA |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Pós-graduação em Administração, Escola de Administração, UFBA |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Organizações & Sociedade; Vol. 25 No. 87 (2018) Organizações & Sociedade; v. 25 n. 87 (2018) 1984-9230 1413-585X reponame:Organizações & Sociedade (Online) instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) instacron:UFBA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) |
instacron_str |
UFBA |
institution |
UFBA |
reponame_str |
Organizações & Sociedade (Online) |
collection |
Organizações & Sociedade (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Organizações & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
candidab@ufba.br||revistaoes@ufba.br |
_version_ |
1799698970857963520 |