DEFENSE COALITIONS IN MARITIME CARGO TRANSPORTATION POLICY IN BRAZIL: privatization, decentralization and opening to foreign capital

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Henrique Campos
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Sanches Filho, Alvino
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Caderno CRH
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/crh/article/view/55996
Resumo: The central question was the following: how and which defense coalitions influenced the Policy in the period studied and what were the beliefs andvalues that delineated these coalitions? The work dialogued with the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). The characterization of the coalitionswas defined based on three policy core beliefs: centralize or decentralize decisions on concessions and budgetary management of resources arising from commercial maritime activity; exploitation of services linked to the sector by public authorities orprivate initiative; opening or not of foreign capital participation in port and navigation exploration (Campos de Oliveira, You and Coelho, 2021). Insequence, three moments were determined to carry out a diachronic comparative study: the civilmilitarydictatorship (1964/85), the reference for comparison with other periods; the constituent process of 1987/88 (T1); and the Port Modernization Law (T2). In the end, the work identified theNational Corporate Industrial Coalition as dominant in the policy subsystem. It was possible to identify greater conflict in the reform attempt carried out in1993, without the potential, however, to generate significant changes in the policy. 
id UFBA-7_03afaa493aa619981b84839f751ab43e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/55996
network_acronym_str UFBA-7
network_name_str Caderno CRH
repository_id_str
spelling DEFENSE COALITIONS IN MARITIME CARGO TRANSPORTATION POLICY IN BRAZIL: privatization, decentralization and opening to foreign capitalCOALITIONS DE DÉFENSE DANS LA POLITIQUE DE TRANSPORT MARITIME DE MARCHANDISES AU BRÉSIL: privatisation, décentralisation et ouverture aux capitaux étrangersCOALIZÕES DE DEFESA NA POLÍTICA DE TRANSPORTE MARÍTIMO DE CARGAS NO BRASIL: privatização, descentralização e abertura para o capital estrangeiroProcesso decisórioCoalizões de defesaTransporte MarítimoMudanças em políticas públicasMudanças e coalizões de defesa na política portuária brasileiraPolicy ProcessMaritime TransportAdvocay CoalitionsChanges in public policiesProcessus décisionnelTransport maritimecoalitions de défenseChangements dans les politiques publiquesThe central question was the following: how and which defense coalitions influenced the Policy in the period studied and what were the beliefs andvalues that delineated these coalitions? The work dialogued with the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). The characterization of the coalitionswas defined based on three policy core beliefs: centralize or decentralize decisions on concessions and budgetary management of resources arising from commercial maritime activity; exploitation of services linked to the sector by public authorities orprivate initiative; opening or not of foreign capital participation in port and navigation exploration (Campos de Oliveira, You and Coelho, 2021). Insequence, three moments were determined to carry out a diachronic comparative study: the civilmilitarydictatorship (1964/85), the reference for comparison with other periods; the constituent process of 1987/88 (T1); and the Port Modernization Law (T2). In the end, the work identified theNational Corporate Industrial Coalition as dominant in the policy subsystem. It was possible to identify greater conflict in the reform attempt carried out in1993, without the potential, however, to generate significant changes in the policy. La pregunta central fue la siguiente: ¿cómo y qué coaliciones de defensa influyeron en la Política en el período estudiado y cuáles fueron las creencias y valores que delinearon estas coaliciones? La obra dialogó con el Modelo de Coalición de Defensa. La caracterización de las coaliciones se definió con base en tres creencias centrales de la política: centralizar o descentralizar las decisiones sobre concesiones y gestión presupuestaria de los recursos provenientes de la actividad marítima comercial; explotación de servicios vinculados al sector por parte de las administraciones públicas o la iniciativa privada; abriendo o no la participación de capital extranjero en la exploración portuaria y de navegación (Campos de Oliveira, Usted y Coelho, 2021). En secuencia, se determinaron tres momentos para realizar un estudio comparativo diacrónico: la dictadura cívico-militar (1964/85), referente para la comparación con otros períodos; el proceso constituyente de 1987/88 (T1); y la Ley de Modernización Portuaria (T2). Al final, el trabajo identificó a la Coalición Industrial Corporativa Nacional como dominante en el subsistema de políticas. Fue posible identificar un mayor conflicto en el intento de reforma llevado a cabo en 1993, sin potencial, sin embargo, para generar cambios significativos en la política.La question centrale était la suivante: comment et quelles coalitions de  défense ont influencé la politique dans la période étudiée et quelles étaient les croyances et les valeurs qui délimitaient ces coalitions? Le travail a dialogué avec le modèle de coalition de défense. La caractérisation des coalitions a été définie à partir de troisconvictions centrales de la politique: centraliser ou décentraliser les  décisions sur les concessions et la gestion budgétaire des ressources issues de l’activité maritime commerciale; l’exploitation des services liés au secteur par les  pouvoirs publics ou l’initiative privée; ouverture ou non de la participation au capital étranger dans l’exploration portuaire et de navigation (Campos de Oliveira, You et Coelho, 2021). Dans l’ordre, trois moments ont été déterminés pour mener une étude comparative diachronique: la dictature civilo-militaire (1964/85), la référence pour la comparaison avec d’autres périodes; le processus constituant de1987/88 (T1); et la loi de modernisation portuaire (T2). En fin de compte, les  travaux ont identifié la National  Corporate Industrial Coalition comme dominant dans le sous-système  politique. Il a été possible d’identifier  un plus grand conflit dans la tentative de réforme menée en 1993, sans lepotentiel, cependant, de générer des changements significatifs dans la politique.A questão central foi a seguinte: como e quais coalizões de defesa incidiram sobre a Política no período estudado e quais foram as crenças e os valores delineadores dessas coalizões? O trabalho dialogou com o Modelo de Coalizão de Defesa. Definiu-se o quadro de caracterização das coalizões a partir de três crenças centrais da política: centralizar ou  descentralizar as decisões sobre concessões e gestão orçamentária dos recursos oriundos da atividade marítima mercantil; exploração dos serviços vinculados ao setor pelo poder público ou pela iniciativa privada; abertura ou não da participação de capital estrangeiro na  exploração portuária e de navegação (Campos de Oliveira, You e Coelho, 2021). Em  sequência, determinou-se três momentos para realizar um estudo comparado diacrônico: a ditadura civil-militar (1964/85), a referência para comparação aos demais períodos; o processo constituinte de 1987/88 (T1); e a Lei de Modernização dos Portos (T2). Ao final, o trabalho identificou a Coalizão Industrial Nacional Corporativa como dominante no  subsistema da política. Foi possível identificar maior conflito na tentativa de reforma  realizada em 1993, sem potencial, entretanto, para gerar mudanças significativas na política.Universidade Federal da Bahia2023-12-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos pares'texto'application/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/crh/article/view/5599610.9771/ccrh.v36i0.55996Caderno CRH; v. 36 (2023): Publicação Contínua; e0230381983-82390103-4979reponame:Caderno CRHinstname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)instacron:UFBAporhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/crh/article/view/55996/31081http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Henrique CamposSanches Filho, Alvino2023-11-20T09:53:13Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/55996Revistahttps://portalseer.ufba.br/index.php/crh/about/editorialPolicies#custom-0PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevcrh@ufba.br||revcrh@ufba.br1983-82390103-4979opendoar:2023-11-20T09:53:13Caderno CRH - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv DEFENSE COALITIONS IN MARITIME CARGO TRANSPORTATION POLICY IN BRAZIL: privatization, decentralization and opening to foreign capital
COALITIONS DE DÉFENSE DANS LA POLITIQUE DE TRANSPORT MARITIME DE MARCHANDISES AU BRÉSIL: privatisation, décentralisation et ouverture aux capitaux étrangers
COALIZÕES DE DEFESA NA POLÍTICA DE TRANSPORTE MARÍTIMO DE CARGAS NO BRASIL: privatização, descentralização e abertura para o capital estrangeiro
title DEFENSE COALITIONS IN MARITIME CARGO TRANSPORTATION POLICY IN BRAZIL: privatization, decentralization and opening to foreign capital
spellingShingle DEFENSE COALITIONS IN MARITIME CARGO TRANSPORTATION POLICY IN BRAZIL: privatization, decentralization and opening to foreign capital
Oliveira, Henrique Campos
Processo decisório
Coalizões de defesa
Transporte Marítimo
Mudanças em políticas públicas
Mudanças e coalizões de defesa na política portuária brasileira
Policy Process
Maritime Transport
Advocay Coalitions
Changes in public policies
Processus décisionnel
Transport maritime
coalitions de défense
Changements dans les politiques publiques
title_short DEFENSE COALITIONS IN MARITIME CARGO TRANSPORTATION POLICY IN BRAZIL: privatization, decentralization and opening to foreign capital
title_full DEFENSE COALITIONS IN MARITIME CARGO TRANSPORTATION POLICY IN BRAZIL: privatization, decentralization and opening to foreign capital
title_fullStr DEFENSE COALITIONS IN MARITIME CARGO TRANSPORTATION POLICY IN BRAZIL: privatization, decentralization and opening to foreign capital
title_full_unstemmed DEFENSE COALITIONS IN MARITIME CARGO TRANSPORTATION POLICY IN BRAZIL: privatization, decentralization and opening to foreign capital
title_sort DEFENSE COALITIONS IN MARITIME CARGO TRANSPORTATION POLICY IN BRAZIL: privatization, decentralization and opening to foreign capital
author Oliveira, Henrique Campos
author_facet Oliveira, Henrique Campos
Sanches Filho, Alvino
author_role author
author2 Sanches Filho, Alvino
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Henrique Campos
Sanches Filho, Alvino
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Processo decisório
Coalizões de defesa
Transporte Marítimo
Mudanças em políticas públicas
Mudanças e coalizões de defesa na política portuária brasileira
Policy Process
Maritime Transport
Advocay Coalitions
Changes in public policies
Processus décisionnel
Transport maritime
coalitions de défense
Changements dans les politiques publiques
topic Processo decisório
Coalizões de defesa
Transporte Marítimo
Mudanças em políticas públicas
Mudanças e coalizões de defesa na política portuária brasileira
Policy Process
Maritime Transport
Advocay Coalitions
Changes in public policies
Processus décisionnel
Transport maritime
coalitions de défense
Changements dans les politiques publiques
description The central question was the following: how and which defense coalitions influenced the Policy in the period studied and what were the beliefs andvalues that delineated these coalitions? The work dialogued with the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). The characterization of the coalitionswas defined based on three policy core beliefs: centralize or decentralize decisions on concessions and budgetary management of resources arising from commercial maritime activity; exploitation of services linked to the sector by public authorities orprivate initiative; opening or not of foreign capital participation in port and navigation exploration (Campos de Oliveira, You and Coelho, 2021). Insequence, three moments were determined to carry out a diachronic comparative study: the civilmilitarydictatorship (1964/85), the reference for comparison with other periods; the constituent process of 1987/88 (T1); and the Port Modernization Law (T2). In the end, the work identified theNational Corporate Industrial Coalition as dominant in the policy subsystem. It was possible to identify greater conflict in the reform attempt carried out in1993, without the potential, however, to generate significant changes in the policy. 
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos pares
'texto'
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/crh/article/view/55996
10.9771/ccrh.v36i0.55996
url https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/crh/article/view/55996
identifier_str_mv 10.9771/ccrh.v36i0.55996
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/crh/article/view/55996/31081
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Caderno CRH; v. 36 (2023): Publicação Contínua; e023038
1983-8239
0103-4979
reponame:Caderno CRH
instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron:UFBA
instname_str Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron_str UFBA
institution UFBA
reponame_str Caderno CRH
collection Caderno CRH
repository.name.fl_str_mv Caderno CRH - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcrh@ufba.br||revcrh@ufba.br
_version_ 1799699056934518784

Registros relacionados