Two finitudes: Heidegger and Karl Jaspers’ reception by the Weilian category of the finite

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soares, Daniel
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/83392
Resumo: Eric Weil, Karl Jaspers and Martin Heidegger are three German philosophers, one of whom is Jewish. Weil presents in the category of the finite a possibility among the philosophical discourses that comprise Heidegger and Jaspers. This paper proposes a partial understanding of Jaspers and Heidegger through the Weilian category of the finite and the resumption operated by this possibility of discourse – finitude – of the category of work, whose phenomenology is Nazism. For this purpose, the article was divided into three sections, followed by an introduction. The Introduction aims to present the relationship between the three thinkers given through two texts by Weil. We also list the reasons for choosing the works of Heidegger and Jaspers that will be discussed. The first section of the article contains a presentation of the Weilian concepts that are the basis for the following sections. In the second section, these concepts are compared with the Heideggerian thought. In the third section, we apply the same method to Jaspers' thinking, showing the limitations that Heidegger's thinking finds on the political plane. We conclude the paper with a small balance of the discussion.
id UFC-17_564caa8dbf7dded615c97aae130856e3
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/83392
network_acronym_str UFC-17
network_name_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Two finitudes: Heidegger and Karl Jaspers’ reception by the Weilian category of the finiteDuas finitudes: a recepção de Heidegger e Karl Jaspers pela categoria weiliana do finitoFinito. Eric Weil. Jaspers. Heidegger. Nazismo.Finite. Eric Weil. Jaspers. Heidegger. Nazism.Eric Weil, Karl Jaspers and Martin Heidegger are three German philosophers, one of whom is Jewish. Weil presents in the category of the finite a possibility among the philosophical discourses that comprise Heidegger and Jaspers. This paper proposes a partial understanding of Jaspers and Heidegger through the Weilian category of the finite and the resumption operated by this possibility of discourse – finitude – of the category of work, whose phenomenology is Nazism. For this purpose, the article was divided into three sections, followed by an introduction. The Introduction aims to present the relationship between the three thinkers given through two texts by Weil. We also list the reasons for choosing the works of Heidegger and Jaspers that will be discussed. The first section of the article contains a presentation of the Weilian concepts that are the basis for the following sections. In the second section, these concepts are compared with the Heideggerian thought. In the third section, we apply the same method to Jaspers' thinking, showing the limitations that Heidegger's thinking finds on the political plane. We conclude the paper with a small balance of the discussion.Eric Weil, Karl Jaspers e Martin Heidegger são três filósofos alemães, um deles, judeu: Weil apresenta na categoria do finito uma possibilidade entre os discursos filosóficos que compreende Heidegger e Jaspers. O presente artigo propõe uma compreensão parcial de Jaspers e Heidegger por meio da categoria do finito weiliana e da retomada operada por essa possibilidade do discurso – a finitude – da categoria da obra, cuja fenomenologia é o nazismo. Para esse objetivo, dividiu-se o artigo em três seções, seguidas de uma introdução. Na Introdução apresentamos a relação entre os três pensadores dada por meio de dois textos de Weil. Também elencamos os motivos da escolha das obras de Heidegger e Jaspers que serão discutidas. A primeira seção do artigo contém uma apresentação dos conceitos weilianos que são a base para as seções seguintes. Na segunda seção, esses conceitos são cotejados com o pensamento heideggeriano. Na terceira seção, aplicamos o mesmo método ao pensar de Jaspers, mostrando as limitações que o pensamento de Heidegger encontra no plano político. Encerramos com um pequeno balanço da discussão.Universidade Federal do Ceará2023-07-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/8339210.36517/10.36517/Argumentos.30.3Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No. 30 (2023); 39-53Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 30 (2023); 39-53Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 30 (2023); 39-531984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/83392/249510Copyright (c) 2023 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoares, Daniel2023-08-12T11:35:28Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/83392Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2023-08-12T11:35:28Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Two finitudes: Heidegger and Karl Jaspers’ reception by the Weilian category of the finite
Duas finitudes: a recepção de Heidegger e Karl Jaspers pela categoria weiliana do finito
title Two finitudes: Heidegger and Karl Jaspers’ reception by the Weilian category of the finite
spellingShingle Two finitudes: Heidegger and Karl Jaspers’ reception by the Weilian category of the finite
Soares, Daniel
Finito. Eric Weil. Jaspers. Heidegger. Nazismo.
Finite. Eric Weil. Jaspers. Heidegger. Nazism.
title_short Two finitudes: Heidegger and Karl Jaspers’ reception by the Weilian category of the finite
title_full Two finitudes: Heidegger and Karl Jaspers’ reception by the Weilian category of the finite
title_fullStr Two finitudes: Heidegger and Karl Jaspers’ reception by the Weilian category of the finite
title_full_unstemmed Two finitudes: Heidegger and Karl Jaspers’ reception by the Weilian category of the finite
title_sort Two finitudes: Heidegger and Karl Jaspers’ reception by the Weilian category of the finite
author Soares, Daniel
author_facet Soares, Daniel
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soares, Daniel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Finito. Eric Weil. Jaspers. Heidegger. Nazismo.
Finite. Eric Weil. Jaspers. Heidegger. Nazism.
topic Finito. Eric Weil. Jaspers. Heidegger. Nazismo.
Finite. Eric Weil. Jaspers. Heidegger. Nazism.
description Eric Weil, Karl Jaspers and Martin Heidegger are three German philosophers, one of whom is Jewish. Weil presents in the category of the finite a possibility among the philosophical discourses that comprise Heidegger and Jaspers. This paper proposes a partial understanding of Jaspers and Heidegger through the Weilian category of the finite and the resumption operated by this possibility of discourse – finitude – of the category of work, whose phenomenology is Nazism. For this purpose, the article was divided into three sections, followed by an introduction. The Introduction aims to present the relationship between the three thinkers given through two texts by Weil. We also list the reasons for choosing the works of Heidegger and Jaspers that will be discussed. The first section of the article contains a presentation of the Weilian concepts that are the basis for the following sections. In the second section, these concepts are compared with the Heideggerian thought. In the third section, we apply the same method to Jaspers' thinking, showing the limitations that Heidegger's thinking finds on the political plane. We conclude the paper with a small balance of the discussion.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/83392
10.36517/10.36517/Argumentos.30.3
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/83392
identifier_str_mv 10.36517/10.36517/Argumentos.30.3
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/83392/249510
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No. 30 (2023); 39-53
Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 30 (2023); 39-53
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 30 (2023); 39-53
1984-4255
1984-4247
reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
collection Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv argumentos@ufc.br||
_version_ 1797068844883247104