Two finitudes: Heidegger and Karl Jaspers’ reception by the Weilian category of the finite
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/83392 |
Resumo: | Eric Weil, Karl Jaspers and Martin Heidegger are three German philosophers, one of whom is Jewish. Weil presents in the category of the finite a possibility among the philosophical discourses that comprise Heidegger and Jaspers. This paper proposes a partial understanding of Jaspers and Heidegger through the Weilian category of the finite and the resumption operated by this possibility of discourse – finitude – of the category of work, whose phenomenology is Nazism. For this purpose, the article was divided into three sections, followed by an introduction. The Introduction aims to present the relationship between the three thinkers given through two texts by Weil. We also list the reasons for choosing the works of Heidegger and Jaspers that will be discussed. The first section of the article contains a presentation of the Weilian concepts that are the basis for the following sections. In the second section, these concepts are compared with the Heideggerian thought. In the third section, we apply the same method to Jaspers' thinking, showing the limitations that Heidegger's thinking finds on the political plane. We conclude the paper with a small balance of the discussion. |
id |
UFC-17_564caa8dbf7dded615c97aae130856e3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufc:article/83392 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-17 |
network_name_str |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Two finitudes: Heidegger and Karl Jaspers’ reception by the Weilian category of the finiteDuas finitudes: a recepção de Heidegger e Karl Jaspers pela categoria weiliana do finitoFinito. Eric Weil. Jaspers. Heidegger. Nazismo.Finite. Eric Weil. Jaspers. Heidegger. Nazism.Eric Weil, Karl Jaspers and Martin Heidegger are three German philosophers, one of whom is Jewish. Weil presents in the category of the finite a possibility among the philosophical discourses that comprise Heidegger and Jaspers. This paper proposes a partial understanding of Jaspers and Heidegger through the Weilian category of the finite and the resumption operated by this possibility of discourse – finitude – of the category of work, whose phenomenology is Nazism. For this purpose, the article was divided into three sections, followed by an introduction. The Introduction aims to present the relationship between the three thinkers given through two texts by Weil. We also list the reasons for choosing the works of Heidegger and Jaspers that will be discussed. The first section of the article contains a presentation of the Weilian concepts that are the basis for the following sections. In the second section, these concepts are compared with the Heideggerian thought. In the third section, we apply the same method to Jaspers' thinking, showing the limitations that Heidegger's thinking finds on the political plane. We conclude the paper with a small balance of the discussion.Eric Weil, Karl Jaspers e Martin Heidegger são três filósofos alemães, um deles, judeu: Weil apresenta na categoria do finito uma possibilidade entre os discursos filosóficos que compreende Heidegger e Jaspers. O presente artigo propõe uma compreensão parcial de Jaspers e Heidegger por meio da categoria do finito weiliana e da retomada operada por essa possibilidade do discurso – a finitude – da categoria da obra, cuja fenomenologia é o nazismo. Para esse objetivo, dividiu-se o artigo em três seções, seguidas de uma introdução. Na Introdução apresentamos a relação entre os três pensadores dada por meio de dois textos de Weil. Também elencamos os motivos da escolha das obras de Heidegger e Jaspers que serão discutidas. A primeira seção do artigo contém uma apresentação dos conceitos weilianos que são a base para as seções seguintes. Na segunda seção, esses conceitos são cotejados com o pensamento heideggeriano. Na terceira seção, aplicamos o mesmo método ao pensar de Jaspers, mostrando as limitações que o pensamento de Heidegger encontra no plano político. Encerramos com um pequeno balanço da discussão.Universidade Federal do Ceará2023-07-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/8339210.36517/10.36517/Argumentos.30.3Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No. 30 (2023); 39-53Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 30 (2023); 39-53Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 30 (2023); 39-531984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/83392/249510Copyright (c) 2023 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoares, Daniel2023-08-12T11:35:28Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/83392Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2023-08-12T11:35:28Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Two finitudes: Heidegger and Karl Jaspers’ reception by the Weilian category of the finite Duas finitudes: a recepção de Heidegger e Karl Jaspers pela categoria weiliana do finito |
title |
Two finitudes: Heidegger and Karl Jaspers’ reception by the Weilian category of the finite |
spellingShingle |
Two finitudes: Heidegger and Karl Jaspers’ reception by the Weilian category of the finite Soares, Daniel Finito. Eric Weil. Jaspers. Heidegger. Nazismo. Finite. Eric Weil. Jaspers. Heidegger. Nazism. |
title_short |
Two finitudes: Heidegger and Karl Jaspers’ reception by the Weilian category of the finite |
title_full |
Two finitudes: Heidegger and Karl Jaspers’ reception by the Weilian category of the finite |
title_fullStr |
Two finitudes: Heidegger and Karl Jaspers’ reception by the Weilian category of the finite |
title_full_unstemmed |
Two finitudes: Heidegger and Karl Jaspers’ reception by the Weilian category of the finite |
title_sort |
Two finitudes: Heidegger and Karl Jaspers’ reception by the Weilian category of the finite |
author |
Soares, Daniel |
author_facet |
Soares, Daniel |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Soares, Daniel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Finito. Eric Weil. Jaspers. Heidegger. Nazismo. Finite. Eric Weil. Jaspers. Heidegger. Nazism. |
topic |
Finito. Eric Weil. Jaspers. Heidegger. Nazismo. Finite. Eric Weil. Jaspers. Heidegger. Nazism. |
description |
Eric Weil, Karl Jaspers and Martin Heidegger are three German philosophers, one of whom is Jewish. Weil presents in the category of the finite a possibility among the philosophical discourses that comprise Heidegger and Jaspers. This paper proposes a partial understanding of Jaspers and Heidegger through the Weilian category of the finite and the resumption operated by this possibility of discourse – finitude – of the category of work, whose phenomenology is Nazism. For this purpose, the article was divided into three sections, followed by an introduction. The Introduction aims to present the relationship between the three thinkers given through two texts by Weil. We also list the reasons for choosing the works of Heidegger and Jaspers that will be discussed. The first section of the article contains a presentation of the Weilian concepts that are the basis for the following sections. In the second section, these concepts are compared with the Heideggerian thought. In the third section, we apply the same method to Jaspers' thinking, showing the limitations that Heidegger's thinking finds on the political plane. We conclude the paper with a small balance of the discussion. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/83392 10.36517/10.36517/Argumentos.30.3 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/83392 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.36517/10.36517/Argumentos.30.3 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/83392/249510 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No. 30 (2023); 39-53 Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 30 (2023); 39-53 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 30 (2023); 39-53 1984-4255 1984-4247 reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
collection |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
argumentos@ufc.br|| |
_version_ |
1797068844883247104 |