SALT AND CRUDE PLANT EXTRACTS AS PRESERVATIVES IN A MEAT MODEL SYSTEM (GROUND PORK SHOULDER)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vencato, Aline Aniele
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Nickel, Vinícius Sasso, Silva da Silva, Magnólia Aparecida, kindlein, Liris, Bergmann, Guiomar Pedro, Marchionatti Avancini, Cesar Augusto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Caatinga
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/8823
Resumo: Health risks associated with conventional preservatives and the trend of food healthiness have promoted a growing interest in alternatives of food preservation. These include the use of plant preservatives, condiments and their extracts. Using the indicators count of aerobic mesophiles and pH, the objective of this study was to compare the influence of salt content at the proportions of one, two and three parts with that of the addition of crude plant extracts on the time of preservation of a meat model system (600 g of ground pork shoulder). It was considered suitable for human consumption the treatment whose microbiological count of aerobic mesophiles, observed for 15 days, did not exceed 105 CFU/g. The components (salt and extracts) were mixed with the meat using a Stomacher Lab Blender. The treatment with the highest proportion of salt (three parts) remained viable for consumption for 10 days, while treatments with one part remained for four days and those with two parts remained for nine days. Treatments with “macela” or “laurel” did not statistically differ from treatments with one part of salt. The extracts of “hibiscus”, “clove”, “cinnamon” and “nutmeg”, in the plant:volume proportion (10 g:100 mL) tested, maintained the meat model system suitable for consumption until the fifteenth day. The pH of the treatments did not interfere with the shelf life of the meat model system. The results indicate the potential use of these extracts as preservatives in processed meat products.
id UFERSA-1_24151e4d3c7ff1f501afc65e780adb4a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/8823
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling SALT AND CRUDE PLANT EXTRACTS AS PRESERVATIVES IN A MEAT MODEL SYSTEM (GROUND PORK SHOULDER)SAL E EXTRATOS VEGETAIS BRUTOS COMO CONSERVANTES EM MODELO CÁRNEO (PALETA SUÍNA MOÍDA)Condimentos conservantes. Especiarias conservantes. Preservantes de alimentos. Preservantes vegetais.Preservative condiments. Preservative spices. Food preservatives. Plant preservatives.Health risks associated with conventional preservatives and the trend of food healthiness have promoted a growing interest in alternatives of food preservation. These include the use of plant preservatives, condiments and their extracts. Using the indicators count of aerobic mesophiles and pH, the objective of this study was to compare the influence of salt content at the proportions of one, two and three parts with that of the addition of crude plant extracts on the time of preservation of a meat model system (600 g of ground pork shoulder). It was considered suitable for human consumption the treatment whose microbiological count of aerobic mesophiles, observed for 15 days, did not exceed 105 CFU/g. The components (salt and extracts) were mixed with the meat using a Stomacher Lab Blender. The treatment with the highest proportion of salt (three parts) remained viable for consumption for 10 days, while treatments with one part remained for four days and those with two parts remained for nine days. Treatments with “macela” or “laurel” did not statistically differ from treatments with one part of salt. The extracts of “hibiscus”, “clove”, “cinnamon” and “nutmeg”, in the plant:volume proportion (10 g:100 mL) tested, maintained the meat model system suitable for consumption until the fifteenth day. The pH of the treatments did not interfere with the shelf life of the meat model system. The results indicate the potential use of these extracts as preservatives in processed meat products.Os riscos à saúde atribuídos aos conservantes convencionais e a tendência de saudabilidade dos alimentos promoveram um crescente interesse por alternativas para a preservação dos alimentos. Entre elas a utilização de conservantes de origem vegetal, os condimentos e os extratos deles obtidos. Usando como indicadores a contagem de mesófilos aeróbios e o pH, este trabalho teve como objetivo comparar a influência do teor de sal nas proporções uma, duas e três partes com o da adição de extratos vegetais brutos no tempo de conservação de modelo cárneo (600 g de carne de paleta suína moída). Considerou-se apto para consumo o tratamento cuja contagem de mesófilos, observados por 15 dias, não ultrapassasse 105 UFC/g. Os componentes (sal e extratos) foram misturados ao modelo cárneo usando aparelho Stomacher. O tratamento com a maior proporção de sal (três partes) permaneceu 10 dias viável para o consumo, enquanto os tratamentos com uma parte por quatro dias e duas partes por 9 dias. Os tratamentos com extratos de “macela” e de “louro” não diferiram estatisticamente do tratamento com uma parte de sal. Os extratos de “hibisco”, de “cravo”, de “canela” e de “noz-moscada”, na proporção planta : volume (10 g :100 mL) testados, mantiveram o modelo cárneo apto para o consumo até o décimo quinto dia. O pH dos tratamentos não interferiu no tempo de preservação do modelo cárneo. As evidências indicam o potencial uso desses extratos como conservantes em produtos cárneos processados.  Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2020-05-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/882310.1590/1983-21252020v33n229rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 33 No. 2 (2020); 562-570Revista Caatinga; v. 33 n. 2 (2020); 562-5701983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/8823/10225Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVencato, Aline AnieleNickel, Vinícius SassoSilva da Silva, Magnólia Aparecidakindlein, LirisBergmann, Guiomar PedroMarchionatti Avancini, Cesar Augusto2023-07-21T17:32:49Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/8823Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:43.107Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv SALT AND CRUDE PLANT EXTRACTS AS PRESERVATIVES IN A MEAT MODEL SYSTEM (GROUND PORK SHOULDER)
SAL E EXTRATOS VEGETAIS BRUTOS COMO CONSERVANTES EM MODELO CÁRNEO (PALETA SUÍNA MOÍDA)
title SALT AND CRUDE PLANT EXTRACTS AS PRESERVATIVES IN A MEAT MODEL SYSTEM (GROUND PORK SHOULDER)
spellingShingle SALT AND CRUDE PLANT EXTRACTS AS PRESERVATIVES IN A MEAT MODEL SYSTEM (GROUND PORK SHOULDER)
Vencato, Aline Aniele
Condimentos conservantes. Especiarias conservantes. Preservantes de alimentos. Preservantes vegetais.
Preservative condiments. Preservative spices. Food preservatives. Plant preservatives.
title_short SALT AND CRUDE PLANT EXTRACTS AS PRESERVATIVES IN A MEAT MODEL SYSTEM (GROUND PORK SHOULDER)
title_full SALT AND CRUDE PLANT EXTRACTS AS PRESERVATIVES IN A MEAT MODEL SYSTEM (GROUND PORK SHOULDER)
title_fullStr SALT AND CRUDE PLANT EXTRACTS AS PRESERVATIVES IN A MEAT MODEL SYSTEM (GROUND PORK SHOULDER)
title_full_unstemmed SALT AND CRUDE PLANT EXTRACTS AS PRESERVATIVES IN A MEAT MODEL SYSTEM (GROUND PORK SHOULDER)
title_sort SALT AND CRUDE PLANT EXTRACTS AS PRESERVATIVES IN A MEAT MODEL SYSTEM (GROUND PORK SHOULDER)
author Vencato, Aline Aniele
author_facet Vencato, Aline Aniele
Nickel, Vinícius Sasso
Silva da Silva, Magnólia Aparecida
kindlein, Liris
Bergmann, Guiomar Pedro
Marchionatti Avancini, Cesar Augusto
author_role author
author2 Nickel, Vinícius Sasso
Silva da Silva, Magnólia Aparecida
kindlein, Liris
Bergmann, Guiomar Pedro
Marchionatti Avancini, Cesar Augusto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vencato, Aline Aniele
Nickel, Vinícius Sasso
Silva da Silva, Magnólia Aparecida
kindlein, Liris
Bergmann, Guiomar Pedro
Marchionatti Avancini, Cesar Augusto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Condimentos conservantes. Especiarias conservantes. Preservantes de alimentos. Preservantes vegetais.
Preservative condiments. Preservative spices. Food preservatives. Plant preservatives.
topic Condimentos conservantes. Especiarias conservantes. Preservantes de alimentos. Preservantes vegetais.
Preservative condiments. Preservative spices. Food preservatives. Plant preservatives.
description Health risks associated with conventional preservatives and the trend of food healthiness have promoted a growing interest in alternatives of food preservation. These include the use of plant preservatives, condiments and their extracts. Using the indicators count of aerobic mesophiles and pH, the objective of this study was to compare the influence of salt content at the proportions of one, two and three parts with that of the addition of crude plant extracts on the time of preservation of a meat model system (600 g of ground pork shoulder). It was considered suitable for human consumption the treatment whose microbiological count of aerobic mesophiles, observed for 15 days, did not exceed 105 CFU/g. The components (salt and extracts) were mixed with the meat using a Stomacher Lab Blender. The treatment with the highest proportion of salt (three parts) remained viable for consumption for 10 days, while treatments with one part remained for four days and those with two parts remained for nine days. Treatments with “macela” or “laurel” did not statistically differ from treatments with one part of salt. The extracts of “hibiscus”, “clove”, “cinnamon” and “nutmeg”, in the plant:volume proportion (10 g:100 mL) tested, maintained the meat model system suitable for consumption until the fifteenth day. The pH of the treatments did not interfere with the shelf life of the meat model system. The results indicate the potential use of these extracts as preservatives in processed meat products.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/8823
10.1590/1983-21252020v33n229rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/8823
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252020v33n229rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/8823/10225
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 33 No. 2 (2020); 562-570
Revista Caatinga; v. 33 n. 2 (2020); 562-570
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1797674028240994304