THE REGIME OF CIVIL LIABILITY IN THE GENERAL DATA PROTECTION LAW AND THE GENERAL CLAUSE OF STRICT ATTRIBUTION: : THE DIALOGUE OF SOURCES AS AN INTERPRETATIVE STANDARD
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Jurídica da Ufersa |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/11963 |
Resumo: | The Law n. 13.709/2018 (LGPD) emerged as a normative framework for the fundamental right of Personal Data Protection, establishing principles, granting rights, establishing obligations, and attributing responsibility to data processing agents. However, it did not textually designate the objective or subjective character of the legal regime inherent to the imputation of the obligation to indemnify arising from the operations regulated by it. Thus, this article sought to establish guidelines for understanding the character of this accountability regime in the light of logical-systematic hermeneutics through the prism of objective civil liability established by the Civil Code, having as a background the dialogue of sources as an interpretative standard. To this end, the classic doctrine on the interpretation of the general clause of strict liability of private law was reviewed, as well as modern studies in favor and against the objectivity of the civil liability regime of the LGPD. To build this systematic interpretation, the doctrine of the dialogue of sources was also revisited. In the end, the legal viability of the objective regime for the allocation of civil liability under the LGPD was concluded in light of the risk theory of the activity, according to the application of the theory of dialogue between sources and the Theory of Risk-Created, provided for in the Civil Code. |
id |
UFERSA_e65ec92d29692179ac0fdb04f9dc3706 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/11963 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA |
network_name_str |
Revista Jurídica da Ufersa |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE REGIME OF CIVIL LIABILITY IN THE GENERAL DATA PROTECTION LAW AND THE GENERAL CLAUSE OF STRICT ATTRIBUTION: : THE DIALOGUE OF SOURCES AS AN INTERPRETATIVE STANDARDO regime de responsabilidade civil na Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados e a cláusula geral de imputação objetiva: o diálogo de fontes como padrão interpretativo: THE DIALOGUE OF SOURCES AS AN INTERPRETATIVE STANDARDThe Law n. 13.709/2018 (LGPD) emerged as a normative framework for the fundamental right of Personal Data Protection, establishing principles, granting rights, establishing obligations, and attributing responsibility to data processing agents. However, it did not textually designate the objective or subjective character of the legal regime inherent to the imputation of the obligation to indemnify arising from the operations regulated by it. Thus, this article sought to establish guidelines for understanding the character of this accountability regime in the light of logical-systematic hermeneutics through the prism of objective civil liability established by the Civil Code, having as a background the dialogue of sources as an interpretative standard. To this end, the classic doctrine on the interpretation of the general clause of strict liability of private law was reviewed, as well as modern studies in favor and against the objectivity of the civil liability regime of the LGPD. To build this systematic interpretation, the doctrine of the dialogue of sources was also revisited. In the end, the legal viability of the objective regime for the allocation of civil liability under the LGPD was concluded in light of the risk theory of the activity, according to the application of the theory of dialogue between sources and the Theory of Risk-Created, provided for in the Civil Code.A Lei n. 13.709/2018 (LGPD) se descortinou como marco normativo do direito fundamental de Proteção de Dados Pessoais, predispondo princípios, deferindo direitos, estabelecendo obrigações, e atribuindo responsabilidade aos agentes de tratamento de dados. Contudo, não designou textualmente o caráter objetivo ou subjetivo do regime jurídico inerente à imputação da obrigação de indenizar decorrente das operações por ela disciplinadas. Assim, o presente artigo buscou estabelecer balizas para a compreensão do regime de responsabilização à luz de uma hermenêutica lógico-sistemática com o prisma de responsabilidade civil objetiva estabelecido pelo Código Civil, tendo por pano de fundo o diálogo de fontes como padrão interpretativo. Para tanto, revistou-se a doutrina clássica sobre a interpretação da cláusula geral de responsabilidade objetiva do direito privado, bem como os estudos modernos em favor e contra a objetividade do regime de responsabilidade civil da LGPD. A fim de construir essa interpretação sistemática, revisitou-se também a doutrina do diálogo das fontes. Ao cabo, concluiu-se pela viabilidade jurídica do regime objetivo da imputação da responsabilidade civil no âmbito da LGPD à luz da teoria do risco da atividade, conforme aplicação da teoria do diálogo das fontes frente à Teoria do Risco-Criado, prevista no Código Civil.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2024-03-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/1196310.21708/issn2526-9488.v8.n15.p89-116.2024UFERSA's Law Review; Vol. 8 No. 15 (2024): UFERSA's Law Review; 89-116Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; v. 8 n. 15 (2024): Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; 89-1162526-948810.21708/issn2526-9488.v8.n15.2024reponame:Revista Jurídica da Ufersainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAporhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/11963/11483Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Jurídica da UFERSAhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Jessica HindAcioly, Luis Henrique 2024-03-08T12:50:48Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/11963Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/rejur/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/rejur/oairejur.direito@ufersa.edu.br||2526-94882526-9488opendoar:2024-03-08T12:50:48Revista Jurídica da Ufersa - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE REGIME OF CIVIL LIABILITY IN THE GENERAL DATA PROTECTION LAW AND THE GENERAL CLAUSE OF STRICT ATTRIBUTION: : THE DIALOGUE OF SOURCES AS AN INTERPRETATIVE STANDARD O regime de responsabilidade civil na Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados e a cláusula geral de imputação objetiva: o diálogo de fontes como padrão interpretativo: THE DIALOGUE OF SOURCES AS AN INTERPRETATIVE STANDARD |
title |
THE REGIME OF CIVIL LIABILITY IN THE GENERAL DATA PROTECTION LAW AND THE GENERAL CLAUSE OF STRICT ATTRIBUTION: : THE DIALOGUE OF SOURCES AS AN INTERPRETATIVE STANDARD |
spellingShingle |
THE REGIME OF CIVIL LIABILITY IN THE GENERAL DATA PROTECTION LAW AND THE GENERAL CLAUSE OF STRICT ATTRIBUTION: : THE DIALOGUE OF SOURCES AS AN INTERPRETATIVE STANDARD Costa, Jessica Hind |
title_short |
THE REGIME OF CIVIL LIABILITY IN THE GENERAL DATA PROTECTION LAW AND THE GENERAL CLAUSE OF STRICT ATTRIBUTION: : THE DIALOGUE OF SOURCES AS AN INTERPRETATIVE STANDARD |
title_full |
THE REGIME OF CIVIL LIABILITY IN THE GENERAL DATA PROTECTION LAW AND THE GENERAL CLAUSE OF STRICT ATTRIBUTION: : THE DIALOGUE OF SOURCES AS AN INTERPRETATIVE STANDARD |
title_fullStr |
THE REGIME OF CIVIL LIABILITY IN THE GENERAL DATA PROTECTION LAW AND THE GENERAL CLAUSE OF STRICT ATTRIBUTION: : THE DIALOGUE OF SOURCES AS AN INTERPRETATIVE STANDARD |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE REGIME OF CIVIL LIABILITY IN THE GENERAL DATA PROTECTION LAW AND THE GENERAL CLAUSE OF STRICT ATTRIBUTION: : THE DIALOGUE OF SOURCES AS AN INTERPRETATIVE STANDARD |
title_sort |
THE REGIME OF CIVIL LIABILITY IN THE GENERAL DATA PROTECTION LAW AND THE GENERAL CLAUSE OF STRICT ATTRIBUTION: : THE DIALOGUE OF SOURCES AS AN INTERPRETATIVE STANDARD |
author |
Costa, Jessica Hind |
author_facet |
Costa, Jessica Hind Acioly, Luis Henrique |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Acioly, Luis Henrique |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, Jessica Hind Acioly, Luis Henrique |
description |
The Law n. 13.709/2018 (LGPD) emerged as a normative framework for the fundamental right of Personal Data Protection, establishing principles, granting rights, establishing obligations, and attributing responsibility to data processing agents. However, it did not textually designate the objective or subjective character of the legal regime inherent to the imputation of the obligation to indemnify arising from the operations regulated by it. Thus, this article sought to establish guidelines for understanding the character of this accountability regime in the light of logical-systematic hermeneutics through the prism of objective civil liability established by the Civil Code, having as a background the dialogue of sources as an interpretative standard. To this end, the classic doctrine on the interpretation of the general clause of strict liability of private law was reviewed, as well as modern studies in favor and against the objectivity of the civil liability regime of the LGPD. To build this systematic interpretation, the doctrine of the dialogue of sources was also revisited. In the end, the legal viability of the objective regime for the allocation of civil liability under the LGPD was concluded in light of the risk theory of the activity, according to the application of the theory of dialogue between sources and the Theory of Risk-Created, provided for in the Civil Code. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-03-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/11963 10.21708/issn2526-9488.v8.n15.p89-116.2024 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/11963 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21708/issn2526-9488.v8.n15.p89-116.2024 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/11963/11483 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Jurídica da UFERSA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Jurídica da UFERSA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
UFERSA's Law Review; Vol. 8 No. 15 (2024): UFERSA's Law Review; 89-116 Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; v. 8 n. 15 (2024): Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; 89-116 2526-9488 10.21708/issn2526-9488.v8.n15.2024 reponame:Revista Jurídica da Ufersa instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Revista Jurídica da Ufersa |
collection |
Revista Jurídica da Ufersa |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica da Ufersa - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rejur.direito@ufersa.edu.br|| |
_version_ |
1808129614286946304 |