Labor reform and dignified work: a possible combination?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rafagnin, Maritânia Salete Salvi
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Nogueira, Vera Maria Ribeiro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Argumentum (Vitória)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufes.br/argumentum/article/view/28978
Resumo: This article compares some aspects of the 2017 Labor Reform with the concept of decent work. It starts from the statement made by the federal government and disseminated by the media and economic elites regarding the relevance of the reform for the integration of Brazil into the reproductive dynamics of capital in the 21st century. Through documentary research, articles 223-G; 611-A; 611-B; 582 and 507-B of Law no. 13,467/2017 are analyzed, as well as the unrestricted outsourcing contained in Law no. 13,429/2017, juxtaposing these devices with the concept of dignified work. The results point to the incompatibility of the rules with this concept. In conclusion, it is evident that the deregulation and flexibilisation within the analyzed articles form a process of the dismantling the labor rights established by the neoliberal model, implying new morphologies in labor precariousness.
id UFES-5_f44d1ed7ce7413a035a3c7e7234737f3
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufes.br:article/28978
network_acronym_str UFES-5
network_name_str Argumentum (Vitória)
repository_id_str
spelling Labor reform and dignified work: a possible combination?Reforma trabalhista e trabalho digno: uma combinação possível?This article compares some aspects of the 2017 Labor Reform with the concept of decent work. It starts from the statement made by the federal government and disseminated by the media and economic elites regarding the relevance of the reform for the integration of Brazil into the reproductive dynamics of capital in the 21st century. Through documentary research, articles 223-G; 611-A; 611-B; 582 and 507-B of Law no. 13,467/2017 are analyzed, as well as the unrestricted outsourcing contained in Law no. 13,429/2017, juxtaposing these devices with the concept of dignified work. The results point to the incompatibility of the rules with this concept. In conclusion, it is evident that the deregulation and flexibilisation within the analyzed articles form a process of the dismantling the labor rights established by the neoliberal model, implying new morphologies in labor precariousness.Neste artigo, faz-se uma comparação entre alguns aspectos da Reforma Trabalhista de 2017 e o conceito de trabalho digno. Parte-se do suposto enunciado pelo governo federal e veiculado pela mídia e elites econômicas da relevância da reforma para a integração do Brasil à dinâmica de reprodução do capital no século XXI. Através da pesquisa documental, analisam-se da Lei nº 13.467/2017, os arts. 223-G; 611-A; 611-B; 582 e 507-B; e a terceirização irrestrita da Lei nº 13.429/2017, confrontando esses dispositivos, posteriormente, com o conceito de trabalho digno. Os resultados apontam para a incompatibilidade das normas com referido conceito. À guisa de conclusão, evidencia-se como a desregulamentação e a flexibilização dos artigos analisados compõem o processo de desmonte dos direitos laborais previstos pelo modelo neoliberal, implicando novas morfologias da precarização do trabalho.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Política Social da UFES2021-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufes.br/argumentum/article/view/2897810.47456/argumentum.v13i1.28978Argumentum; v. 13 n. 1 (2021): Os impactos da pandemia COVID-19 sobre as políticas sociais; 153-166Argumentum; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021): Os impactos da pandemia COVID-19 sobre as políticas sociais; 153-1662176-957510.47456/argumentum.v13i1reponame:Argumentum (Vitória)instname:Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)instacron:UFESporhttps://periodicos.ufes.br/argumentum/article/view/28978/23396Copyright (c) 2021 Argumentuminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRafagnin, Maritânia Salete SalviNogueira, Vera Maria Ribeiro2021-05-01T01:36:08Zoai:periodicos.ufes.br:article/28978Revistahttp://periodicos.ufes.br/argumentumPUBhttps://periodicos.ufes.br/argumentum/oairevistaargumentum@ufes.br2176-95752176-9575opendoar:2021-05-01T01:36:08Argumentum (Vitória) - Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Labor reform and dignified work: a possible combination?
Reforma trabalhista e trabalho digno: uma combinação possível?
title Labor reform and dignified work: a possible combination?
spellingShingle Labor reform and dignified work: a possible combination?
Rafagnin, Maritânia Salete Salvi
title_short Labor reform and dignified work: a possible combination?
title_full Labor reform and dignified work: a possible combination?
title_fullStr Labor reform and dignified work: a possible combination?
title_full_unstemmed Labor reform and dignified work: a possible combination?
title_sort Labor reform and dignified work: a possible combination?
author Rafagnin, Maritânia Salete Salvi
author_facet Rafagnin, Maritânia Salete Salvi
Nogueira, Vera Maria Ribeiro
author_role author
author2 Nogueira, Vera Maria Ribeiro
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rafagnin, Maritânia Salete Salvi
Nogueira, Vera Maria Ribeiro
description This article compares some aspects of the 2017 Labor Reform with the concept of decent work. It starts from the statement made by the federal government and disseminated by the media and economic elites regarding the relevance of the reform for the integration of Brazil into the reproductive dynamics of capital in the 21st century. Through documentary research, articles 223-G; 611-A; 611-B; 582 and 507-B of Law no. 13,467/2017 are analyzed, as well as the unrestricted outsourcing contained in Law no. 13,429/2017, juxtaposing these devices with the concept of dignified work. The results point to the incompatibility of the rules with this concept. In conclusion, it is evident that the deregulation and flexibilisation within the analyzed articles form a process of the dismantling the labor rights established by the neoliberal model, implying new morphologies in labor precariousness.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufes.br/argumentum/article/view/28978
10.47456/argumentum.v13i1.28978
url https://periodicos.ufes.br/argumentum/article/view/28978
identifier_str_mv 10.47456/argumentum.v13i1.28978
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufes.br/argumentum/article/view/28978/23396
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Argumentum
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Argumentum
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Política Social da UFES
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Política Social da UFES
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Argumentum; v. 13 n. 1 (2021): Os impactos da pandemia COVID-19 sobre as políticas sociais; 153-166
Argumentum; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021): Os impactos da pandemia COVID-19 sobre as políticas sociais; 153-166
2176-9575
10.47456/argumentum.v13i1
reponame:Argumentum (Vitória)
instname:Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)
instacron:UFES
instname_str Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)
instacron_str UFES
institution UFES
reponame_str Argumentum (Vitória)
collection Argumentum (Vitória)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Argumentum (Vitória) - Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistaargumentum@ufes.br
_version_ 1799319762003558400