Labor reform and dignified work: a possible combination?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Argumentum (Vitória) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufes.br/argumentum/article/view/28978 |
Resumo: | This article compares some aspects of the 2017 Labor Reform with the concept of decent work. It starts from the statement made by the federal government and disseminated by the media and economic elites regarding the relevance of the reform for the integration of Brazil into the reproductive dynamics of capital in the 21st century. Through documentary research, articles 223-G; 611-A; 611-B; 582 and 507-B of Law no. 13,467/2017 are analyzed, as well as the unrestricted outsourcing contained in Law no. 13,429/2017, juxtaposing these devices with the concept of dignified work. The results point to the incompatibility of the rules with this concept. In conclusion, it is evident that the deregulation and flexibilisation within the analyzed articles form a process of the dismantling the labor rights established by the neoliberal model, implying new morphologies in labor precariousness. |
id |
UFES-5_f44d1ed7ce7413a035a3c7e7234737f3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufes.br:article/28978 |
network_acronym_str |
UFES-5 |
network_name_str |
Argumentum (Vitória) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Labor reform and dignified work: a possible combination?Reforma trabalhista e trabalho digno: uma combinação possível?This article compares some aspects of the 2017 Labor Reform with the concept of decent work. It starts from the statement made by the federal government and disseminated by the media and economic elites regarding the relevance of the reform for the integration of Brazil into the reproductive dynamics of capital in the 21st century. Through documentary research, articles 223-G; 611-A; 611-B; 582 and 507-B of Law no. 13,467/2017 are analyzed, as well as the unrestricted outsourcing contained in Law no. 13,429/2017, juxtaposing these devices with the concept of dignified work. The results point to the incompatibility of the rules with this concept. In conclusion, it is evident that the deregulation and flexibilisation within the analyzed articles form a process of the dismantling the labor rights established by the neoliberal model, implying new morphologies in labor precariousness.Neste artigo, faz-se uma comparação entre alguns aspectos da Reforma Trabalhista de 2017 e o conceito de trabalho digno. Parte-se do suposto enunciado pelo governo federal e veiculado pela mídia e elites econômicas da relevância da reforma para a integração do Brasil à dinâmica de reprodução do capital no século XXI. Através da pesquisa documental, analisam-se da Lei nº 13.467/2017, os arts. 223-G; 611-A; 611-B; 582 e 507-B; e a terceirização irrestrita da Lei nº 13.429/2017, confrontando esses dispositivos, posteriormente, com o conceito de trabalho digno. Os resultados apontam para a incompatibilidade das normas com referido conceito. À guisa de conclusão, evidencia-se como a desregulamentação e a flexibilização dos artigos analisados compõem o processo de desmonte dos direitos laborais previstos pelo modelo neoliberal, implicando novas morfologias da precarização do trabalho.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Política Social da UFES2021-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufes.br/argumentum/article/view/2897810.47456/argumentum.v13i1.28978Argumentum; v. 13 n. 1 (2021): Os impactos da pandemia COVID-19 sobre as políticas sociais; 153-166Argumentum; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021): Os impactos da pandemia COVID-19 sobre as políticas sociais; 153-1662176-957510.47456/argumentum.v13i1reponame:Argumentum (Vitória)instname:Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)instacron:UFESporhttps://periodicos.ufes.br/argumentum/article/view/28978/23396Copyright (c) 2021 Argumentuminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRafagnin, Maritânia Salete SalviNogueira, Vera Maria Ribeiro2021-05-01T01:36:08Zoai:periodicos.ufes.br:article/28978Revistahttp://periodicos.ufes.br/argumentumPUBhttps://periodicos.ufes.br/argumentum/oairevistaargumentum@ufes.br2176-95752176-9575opendoar:2021-05-01T01:36:08Argumentum (Vitória) - Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Labor reform and dignified work: a possible combination? Reforma trabalhista e trabalho digno: uma combinação possível? |
title |
Labor reform and dignified work: a possible combination? |
spellingShingle |
Labor reform and dignified work: a possible combination? Rafagnin, Maritânia Salete Salvi |
title_short |
Labor reform and dignified work: a possible combination? |
title_full |
Labor reform and dignified work: a possible combination? |
title_fullStr |
Labor reform and dignified work: a possible combination? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Labor reform and dignified work: a possible combination? |
title_sort |
Labor reform and dignified work: a possible combination? |
author |
Rafagnin, Maritânia Salete Salvi |
author_facet |
Rafagnin, Maritânia Salete Salvi Nogueira, Vera Maria Ribeiro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nogueira, Vera Maria Ribeiro |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rafagnin, Maritânia Salete Salvi Nogueira, Vera Maria Ribeiro |
description |
This article compares some aspects of the 2017 Labor Reform with the concept of decent work. It starts from the statement made by the federal government and disseminated by the media and economic elites regarding the relevance of the reform for the integration of Brazil into the reproductive dynamics of capital in the 21st century. Through documentary research, articles 223-G; 611-A; 611-B; 582 and 507-B of Law no. 13,467/2017 are analyzed, as well as the unrestricted outsourcing contained in Law no. 13,429/2017, juxtaposing these devices with the concept of dignified work. The results point to the incompatibility of the rules with this concept. In conclusion, it is evident that the deregulation and flexibilisation within the analyzed articles form a process of the dismantling the labor rights established by the neoliberal model, implying new morphologies in labor precariousness. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufes.br/argumentum/article/view/28978 10.47456/argumentum.v13i1.28978 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufes.br/argumentum/article/view/28978 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.47456/argumentum.v13i1.28978 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufes.br/argumentum/article/view/28978/23396 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Argumentum info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Argumentum |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Política Social da UFES |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Política Social da UFES |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Argumentum; v. 13 n. 1 (2021): Os impactos da pandemia COVID-19 sobre as políticas sociais; 153-166 Argumentum; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021): Os impactos da pandemia COVID-19 sobre as políticas sociais; 153-166 2176-9575 10.47456/argumentum.v13i1 reponame:Argumentum (Vitória) instname:Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES) instacron:UFES |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES) |
instacron_str |
UFES |
institution |
UFES |
reponame_str |
Argumentum (Vitória) |
collection |
Argumentum (Vitória) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Argumentum (Vitória) - Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistaargumentum@ufes.br |
_version_ |
1799319762003558400 |