SOME CONCEPTS OF THE BAKHTINIAN DIALOGIC THEORY OF DISCOURSE AND THE LITERATURE TEACHING
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Gragoatá |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/32999 |
Resumo: | This article - part of the postdoctoral project A Bakhtinian theoretical and methodological approach of the literary collection of the National Program School Library (PNBE) / 2013 for high school – aims to show the relevance of some concepts of Bakhtin’s theory of discourse for teaching literature. In working with literature in the classroom, if we want to face the evils of its inadequate schooling (SOARES, 2011), it is important to understand concepts such as dialogism, which helps to address the different stylistic and axiological layers of the artistic discourses in general, not only of the literary ones. Working didactically with the notion of “dialogic construction” of the literary discourse means to form readers able to notice the nuances of the polysemic text, who can build interpretations of it according to their world view and knowledge, who can make “aesthetic and / or affective” appreciations with confidence and develop “appreciations on ethical and / or political values” (ROJO, 2004). Under Bakhtin’s perspective, it is understood that communication is done through the concrete utterance comprising two parts: the part perceived or performed on words and the assumed part - the spatial and ideational horizon shared by speakers; its distinctive feature is that it provides a myriad of connections with the extra verbal context of life (BAKHTIN, VOLOSHINOV, 1976). The understanding of the concept of concrete utterance contributes to the teacher perceives the question of ideology from the Bakhtinian point of view - everything that involves the worldview and its value scale. This notion allows us to see the positive and negative values that run through all the discourses and constitute them as discourses from different social voices. |
id |
UFF-6_7121dda4ff2e42940fe65c1f566868c1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/32999 |
network_acronym_str |
UFF-6 |
network_name_str |
Gragoatá |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
SOME CONCEPTS OF THE BAKHTINIAN DIALOGIC THEORY OF DISCOURSE AND THE LITERATURE TEACHINGALGUNS CONCEITOS DA TEORIA BAKHTINIANA DO DISCURSO E O ENSINO DE LITERATURALiterature teachingDialogismConcrete utteranceEnsino de literaturaDialogismoEnunciado concretoThis article - part of the postdoctoral project A Bakhtinian theoretical and methodological approach of the literary collection of the National Program School Library (PNBE) / 2013 for high school – aims to show the relevance of some concepts of Bakhtin’s theory of discourse for teaching literature. In working with literature in the classroom, if we want to face the evils of its inadequate schooling (SOARES, 2011), it is important to understand concepts such as dialogism, which helps to address the different stylistic and axiological layers of the artistic discourses in general, not only of the literary ones. Working didactically with the notion of “dialogic construction” of the literary discourse means to form readers able to notice the nuances of the polysemic text, who can build interpretations of it according to their world view and knowledge, who can make “aesthetic and / or affective” appreciations with confidence and develop “appreciations on ethical and / or political values” (ROJO, 2004). Under Bakhtin’s perspective, it is understood that communication is done through the concrete utterance comprising two parts: the part perceived or performed on words and the assumed part - the spatial and ideational horizon shared by speakers; its distinctive feature is that it provides a myriad of connections with the extra verbal context of life (BAKHTIN, VOLOSHINOV, 1976). The understanding of the concept of concrete utterance contributes to the teacher perceives the question of ideology from the Bakhtinian point of view - everything that involves the worldview and its value scale. This notion allows us to see the positive and negative values that run through all the discourses and constitute them as discourses from different social voices.Este artigo - parte do projeto de pós-doutorado Uma abordagem teórico-metodológica bakhtiniana do acervo literário do Programa Nacional Biblioteca da Escola (PNBE)/2013 para o ensino médio – procura demonstrar a pertinência de alguns conceitos da teoria bakhtiniana do discurso para o ensino de literatura. No trabalho com literatura em sala de aula, se quisermos enfrentar os males da sua escolarização inadequada (SOARES, 2011, p.?), é importante compreender conceitos como dialogismo, que contribui para abordar as diferentes camadas estilísticas e axiológicas próprias dos discursos artísticos em geral, não só do literário. Trabalhar didaticamente com a noção da “construção dialógica” do discurso literário significa poder formar um leitor que percebe os matizes polissêmicos do texto, que pode construir interpretações sobre ele de acordo com sua visão de mundo e seus conhecimentos, que pode fazer com certa segurança apreciações “estéticas e/ou afetivas” e elaborar “apreciações relativas a valores éticos e/ou políticos” (ROJO, 2004, p.?). Sob a perspectiva bakhtiniana, entende-se que a comunicação se dá por meio do enunciado concreto que compreende duas partes: a parte percebida ou realizada em palavras e a parte presumida – o horizonte espacial e ideacional compartilhado pelos falantes; sua característica distintiva é que estabelece uma miríade de conexões com o contexto extraverbal da vida (BAKHTIN; VOLOSHINOV, 1976, p.?). A compreensão do conceito de enunciado concreto contribui para que o professor perceba a questão da ideologia sob o ponto de vista bakhtiniano – tudo o que envolve a visão de mundo e sua escala de valor. Essa noção permite perceber os valores, positivos e negativos, que atravessam todos os discursos e os constituem como discursos das mais diferentes vozes sociais.Universidade Federal Fluminense2014-12-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/3299910.22409/gragoata.v19i37.32999Gragoatá; Vol. 19 No. 37 (2014): Literarture Studies and TeachingGragoatá; v. 19 n. 37 (2014): Estudos de Literatura e ensino2358-41141413-907310.22409/gragoata.v19i37reponame:Gragoatáinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/32999/18986Copyright (c) 2019 Gragoatáinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinto, Mayra2019-08-23T10:56:07Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/32999Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoataPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/oai||revistagragoata@gmail.com2358-41141413-9073opendoar:2019-08-23T10:56:07Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
SOME CONCEPTS OF THE BAKHTINIAN DIALOGIC THEORY OF DISCOURSE AND THE LITERATURE TEACHING ALGUNS CONCEITOS DA TEORIA BAKHTINIANA DO DISCURSO E O ENSINO DE LITERATURA |
title |
SOME CONCEPTS OF THE BAKHTINIAN DIALOGIC THEORY OF DISCOURSE AND THE LITERATURE TEACHING |
spellingShingle |
SOME CONCEPTS OF THE BAKHTINIAN DIALOGIC THEORY OF DISCOURSE AND THE LITERATURE TEACHING Pinto, Mayra Literature teaching Dialogism Concrete utterance Ensino de literatura Dialogismo Enunciado concreto |
title_short |
SOME CONCEPTS OF THE BAKHTINIAN DIALOGIC THEORY OF DISCOURSE AND THE LITERATURE TEACHING |
title_full |
SOME CONCEPTS OF THE BAKHTINIAN DIALOGIC THEORY OF DISCOURSE AND THE LITERATURE TEACHING |
title_fullStr |
SOME CONCEPTS OF THE BAKHTINIAN DIALOGIC THEORY OF DISCOURSE AND THE LITERATURE TEACHING |
title_full_unstemmed |
SOME CONCEPTS OF THE BAKHTINIAN DIALOGIC THEORY OF DISCOURSE AND THE LITERATURE TEACHING |
title_sort |
SOME CONCEPTS OF THE BAKHTINIAN DIALOGIC THEORY OF DISCOURSE AND THE LITERATURE TEACHING |
author |
Pinto, Mayra |
author_facet |
Pinto, Mayra |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pinto, Mayra |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Literature teaching Dialogism Concrete utterance Ensino de literatura Dialogismo Enunciado concreto |
topic |
Literature teaching Dialogism Concrete utterance Ensino de literatura Dialogismo Enunciado concreto |
description |
This article - part of the postdoctoral project A Bakhtinian theoretical and methodological approach of the literary collection of the National Program School Library (PNBE) / 2013 for high school – aims to show the relevance of some concepts of Bakhtin’s theory of discourse for teaching literature. In working with literature in the classroom, if we want to face the evils of its inadequate schooling (SOARES, 2011), it is important to understand concepts such as dialogism, which helps to address the different stylistic and axiological layers of the artistic discourses in general, not only of the literary ones. Working didactically with the notion of “dialogic construction” of the literary discourse means to form readers able to notice the nuances of the polysemic text, who can build interpretations of it according to their world view and knowledge, who can make “aesthetic and / or affective” appreciations with confidence and develop “appreciations on ethical and / or political values” (ROJO, 2004). Under Bakhtin’s perspective, it is understood that communication is done through the concrete utterance comprising two parts: the part perceived or performed on words and the assumed part - the spatial and ideational horizon shared by speakers; its distinctive feature is that it provides a myriad of connections with the extra verbal context of life (BAKHTIN, VOLOSHINOV, 1976). The understanding of the concept of concrete utterance contributes to the teacher perceives the question of ideology from the Bakhtinian point of view - everything that involves the worldview and its value scale. This notion allows us to see the positive and negative values that run through all the discourses and constitute them as discourses from different social voices. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-12-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/32999 10.22409/gragoata.v19i37.32999 |
url |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/32999 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22409/gragoata.v19i37.32999 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/32999/18986 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Gragoatá info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Gragoatá |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Fluminense |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Fluminense |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Gragoatá; Vol. 19 No. 37 (2014): Literarture Studies and Teaching Gragoatá; v. 19 n. 37 (2014): Estudos de Literatura e ensino 2358-4114 1413-9073 10.22409/gragoata.v19i37 reponame:Gragoatá instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) instacron:UFF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
instacron_str |
UFF |
institution |
UFF |
reponame_str |
Gragoatá |
collection |
Gragoatá |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistagragoata@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799705499832156160 |