Is there a place for variation in the cognitive construction grammar? The case of the construction [por SN de X]

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Paiva, Maria da Conceição
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Bruno Araújo de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Gragoatá
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/42326
Resumo: In this paper, we discuss some issues related to the modelling of language variation and change within the framework of the Cognitive Construction Grammar. We particularly put into question the principle of no synonymy as outlined by Goldberg (1995, 2006), especially regarding the indistinction between the semantic and pragmatic components in the definition of construction. To this end, we analyze the intraclausal causal constructions por causa de and por conta de in order to show that they can alternate in some contexts. Although these two constructions play different argumentative functions, they share a set of formal and semantic properties that create a space for variation, especially if we restrict semantic equivalence to the referential meaning. The results of the analysis provide evidence to argue in favor of a stricter delimitation of the principle of no synonymy.---Original in French.
id UFF-6_78fc9b9340ab7525291564587adc2e7e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/42326
network_acronym_str UFF-6
network_name_str Gragoatá
repository_id_str
spelling Is there a place for variation in the cognitive construction grammar? The case of the construction [por SN de X]Y a -t- il une la place pour la variation dans la grammaire de construction cognitive? Le cas de la construction [por SN de X]Variation. Cognitive Construction Grammar. Synonymy.Variation. Grammaire de Constructions Cognitive. Synonymie.In this paper, we discuss some issues related to the modelling of language variation and change within the framework of the Cognitive Construction Grammar. We particularly put into question the principle of no synonymy as outlined by Goldberg (1995, 2006), especially regarding the indistinction between the semantic and pragmatic components in the definition of construction. To this end, we analyze the intraclausal causal constructions por causa de and por conta de in order to show that they can alternate in some contexts. Although these two constructions play different argumentative functions, they share a set of formal and semantic properties that create a space for variation, especially if we restrict semantic equivalence to the referential meaning. The results of the analysis provide evidence to argue in favor of a stricter delimitation of the principle of no synonymy.---Original in French.Dans cet article, nous discutons de certains problèmes liés  à la modélisation de la variation et du changement linguistique dans le cadre théorique de la Grammaire Cognitive des Constructions. Nous remettons notamment en cause  le principe de non synonymie tel que proposé par Goldberg (1995, 2006), principalement en ce qui concerne l’indistinction entre les composantes sémantique et pragmatique dans la définition de construction. Pour cela, nous analysons les constructions causales por causa de et por conta de afin de montrer que dans certains contextes elles peuvent  alterner. Bien que les deux constructions jouent des rôles argumentatifs différents, elles partagent un ensemble de propriétés formelles et sémantiques qui engendrent un espace de variation, surtout si on restreint l’ équivalence sémantique au niveau référentiel. Les résultats de l’analyse permettent d’apporter des arguments favorables à une définition plus stricte du principe de non synonymie.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------HA LUGAR PARA VARIAÇÃO NA GRAMATICA DE CONSTRUÇÕES COGNITIVA? O CASO DA CONSTRUÇÃO [por SN de X]Neste artigo, discutimos alguns problemas relativos à modelização da variação e da mudança linguística no quadro teórico da Gramática de Construções Cognitiva. Colocamos em causa, em especial, o princípio da não sinonímia tal como formulado por Goldberg (1995, 2006), principalmente no que se refere à indistinção entre os componentes semântico e pragmático na definição de construção. Para tanto, analisamos as construções causais intraoracionais por causa de e por conta de, com o objetivo de mostrar que elas podem alternar em alguns dos seus contextos. Embora as duas construções desempenhem funções argumentativas distintas, elas partilham um conjunto de propriedades formais e semânticas que criam um espaço de variação, principalmente se restringimos equivalência semântica ao nível referencial. Os resultados obtidos na análise fornecem evidências para argumentar a favor de uma delimitação mais estrita do princípio de não sinonímia.---Original em francês.Universidade Federal Fluminense2020-09-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/4232610.22409/gragoata.v25i52.42326Gragoatá; Vol. 25 No. 52 (2020): Grammar of constructions and interfaces; 879-909Gragoatá; v. 25 n. 52 (2020): Gramática de Construções e interfaces; 879-9092358-41141413-907310.22409/gragoata.v25i52reponame:Gragoatáinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/42326/26461Copyright (c) 2020 Gragoatáinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPaiva, Maria da ConceiçãoOliveira, Bruno Araújo de2020-09-21T09:06:32Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/42326Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoataPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/oai||revistagragoata@gmail.com2358-41141413-9073opendoar:2020-09-21T09:06:32Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is there a place for variation in the cognitive construction grammar? The case of the construction [por SN de X]
Y a -t- il une la place pour la variation dans la grammaire de construction cognitive? Le cas de la construction [por SN de X]
title Is there a place for variation in the cognitive construction grammar? The case of the construction [por SN de X]
spellingShingle Is there a place for variation in the cognitive construction grammar? The case of the construction [por SN de X]
Paiva, Maria da Conceição
Variation. Cognitive Construction Grammar. Synonymy.
Variation. Grammaire de Constructions Cognitive. Synonymie.
title_short Is there a place for variation in the cognitive construction grammar? The case of the construction [por SN de X]
title_full Is there a place for variation in the cognitive construction grammar? The case of the construction [por SN de X]
title_fullStr Is there a place for variation in the cognitive construction grammar? The case of the construction [por SN de X]
title_full_unstemmed Is there a place for variation in the cognitive construction grammar? The case of the construction [por SN de X]
title_sort Is there a place for variation in the cognitive construction grammar? The case of the construction [por SN de X]
author Paiva, Maria da Conceição
author_facet Paiva, Maria da Conceição
Oliveira, Bruno Araújo de
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Bruno Araújo de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Paiva, Maria da Conceição
Oliveira, Bruno Araújo de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Variation. Cognitive Construction Grammar. Synonymy.
Variation. Grammaire de Constructions Cognitive. Synonymie.
topic Variation. Cognitive Construction Grammar. Synonymy.
Variation. Grammaire de Constructions Cognitive. Synonymie.
description In this paper, we discuss some issues related to the modelling of language variation and change within the framework of the Cognitive Construction Grammar. We particularly put into question the principle of no synonymy as outlined by Goldberg (1995, 2006), especially regarding the indistinction between the semantic and pragmatic components in the definition of construction. To this end, we analyze the intraclausal causal constructions por causa de and por conta de in order to show that they can alternate in some contexts. Although these two constructions play different argumentative functions, they share a set of formal and semantic properties that create a space for variation, especially if we restrict semantic equivalence to the referential meaning. The results of the analysis provide evidence to argue in favor of a stricter delimitation of the principle of no synonymy.---Original in French.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/42326
10.22409/gragoata.v25i52.42326
url https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/42326
identifier_str_mv 10.22409/gragoata.v25i52.42326
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/42326/26461
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Gragoatá
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Gragoatá
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Fluminense
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Fluminense
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Gragoatá; Vol. 25 No. 52 (2020): Grammar of constructions and interfaces; 879-909
Gragoatá; v. 25 n. 52 (2020): Gramática de Construções e interfaces; 879-909
2358-4114
1413-9073
10.22409/gragoata.v25i52
reponame:Gragoatá
instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron:UFF
instname_str Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron_str UFF
institution UFF
reponame_str Gragoatá
collection Gragoatá
repository.name.fl_str_mv Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistagragoata@gmail.com
_version_ 1799705502891900928

Registros relacionados