Spinoza and the ethical-social issue of desire: comparative studies of the philosphies of Epicurus-Lucrecius and Machiavelli

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bove, Laurent
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4908
Resumo: Epicurus, Democritus, Lucrecius (in the letter 56 to Hugo Boxel) and Machiavelli (in the Political Treaty) are the two streams of thought that Spinoza cites in a quite eulogistic way. We propose to study here the affiliations and the differences between the philosophies of Spinoza, Epicurus and  Machiavelli in a comparative analysis, departing from the ethical and social issue of desire.
id UFF-7_2c5b59f7a316b7bcde1becc813918370
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4908
network_acronym_str UFF-7
network_name_str Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
repository_id_str
spelling Spinoza and the ethical-social issue of desire: comparative studies of the philosphies of Epicurus-Lucrecius and MachiavelliSpinoza et la question éthico-sociale du désir: études comparatives avec Epicure-Lucrece et MachiavelSpinoza et la question éthico-sociale du désir: études comparatives avec Épicure-Lucrece et Machiaveldesirepleasureprudencedesirplaisirprudencedesirplaisirprudence.Epicurus, Democritus, Lucrecius (in the letter 56 to Hugo Boxel) and Machiavelli (in the Political Treaty) are the two streams of thought that Spinoza cites in a quite eulogistic way. We propose to study here the affiliations and the differences between the philosophies of Spinoza, Epicurus and  Machiavelli in a comparative analysis, departing from the ethical and social issue of desire.“Épicure, Démocrite, Lucrèce” (dans la lettre 56 à Hugo Boxel) et “Machiavel” (dans le Traité politique) sont les deux courants de pensée que Spinoza (1966[1674], 2002[1677]), cite de manière très élogieuse. Nous nous proposons d’étudier ici – selon une analyse comparative et à partir de la question éthico-sociale du Désir – les filiations et les différences de la philosophie spinoziste avec la pensée épicurienne et la pensée de Machiavel.“Épicure, Démocrite, Lucrèce” (dans la lettre 56 à Hugo Boxel) et “Machiavel” (dans le Traité politique) sont les deux courants de pensée que Spinoza (1966[1674], 2002[1677]), cite de manière très élogieuse. Nous nous proposons d’étudier ici – selon une analyse comparative et à partir de la question éthico-sociale du Désir – les filiations et les différences de la philosophie spinoziste avec la pensée épicurienne et la pensée de Machiavel.ABEC2012-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4908Fractal: Journal of Psychology; Vol. 24 No. 3 (2012); 443-472Fractal: Revista de Psicologia; v. 24 n. 3 (2012); 443-4721984-0292reponame:Fractal : Revista de Psicologiainstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4908/4749https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4908/4750Copyright (c) 2018 Fractalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBove, Laurent2018-06-05T12:03:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4908Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractalPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/oai||anaclmonteiro@yahoo.com.br|| mlivianascimento@gmail.com1984-02921984-0292opendoar:2018-06-05T12:03:08Fractal : Revista de Psicologia - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Spinoza and the ethical-social issue of desire: comparative studies of the philosphies of Epicurus-Lucrecius and Machiavelli
Spinoza et la question éthico-sociale du désir: études comparatives avec Epicure-Lucrece et Machiavel
Spinoza et la question éthico-sociale du désir: études comparatives avec Épicure-Lucrece et Machiavel
title Spinoza and the ethical-social issue of desire: comparative studies of the philosphies of Epicurus-Lucrecius and Machiavelli
spellingShingle Spinoza and the ethical-social issue of desire: comparative studies of the philosphies of Epicurus-Lucrecius and Machiavelli
Bove, Laurent
desire
pleasure
prudence
desir
plaisir
prudence
desir
plaisir
prudence.
title_short Spinoza and the ethical-social issue of desire: comparative studies of the philosphies of Epicurus-Lucrecius and Machiavelli
title_full Spinoza and the ethical-social issue of desire: comparative studies of the philosphies of Epicurus-Lucrecius and Machiavelli
title_fullStr Spinoza and the ethical-social issue of desire: comparative studies of the philosphies of Epicurus-Lucrecius and Machiavelli
title_full_unstemmed Spinoza and the ethical-social issue of desire: comparative studies of the philosphies of Epicurus-Lucrecius and Machiavelli
title_sort Spinoza and the ethical-social issue of desire: comparative studies of the philosphies of Epicurus-Lucrecius and Machiavelli
author Bove, Laurent
author_facet Bove, Laurent
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bove, Laurent
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv desire
pleasure
prudence
desir
plaisir
prudence
desir
plaisir
prudence.
topic desire
pleasure
prudence
desir
plaisir
prudence
desir
plaisir
prudence.
description Epicurus, Democritus, Lucrecius (in the letter 56 to Hugo Boxel) and Machiavelli (in the Political Treaty) are the two streams of thought that Spinoza cites in a quite eulogistic way. We propose to study here the affiliations and the differences between the philosophies of Spinoza, Epicurus and  Machiavelli in a comparative analysis, departing from the ethical and social issue of desire.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4908
url https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4908
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4908/4749
https://periodicos.uff.br/fractal/article/view/4908/4750
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Fractal
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Fractal
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABEC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABEC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Fractal: Journal of Psychology; Vol. 24 No. 3 (2012); 443-472
Fractal: Revista de Psicologia; v. 24 n. 3 (2012); 443-472
1984-0292
reponame:Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron:UFF
instname_str Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron_str UFF
institution UFF
reponame_str Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
collection Fractal : Revista de Psicologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Fractal : Revista de Psicologia - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||anaclmonteiro@yahoo.com.br|| mlivianascimento@gmail.com
_version_ 1799695290336280577

Registros relacionados