ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND CITIZENSHIP: HOW CONSENSUAL MEANS OF SOLUTION AND CONFLICT PREVENTION CAN STRENGTHEN CITIZENSHIP AND RESTORE COMMUNITY TIES
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/68261 |
Resumo: | The present study investigates whether consensual means of conflict solution constitute denial of jurisdiction or, instead, represent a paradigmatic change that can serve to strengthen citizenship and democracy. It analyzes the constitutional guarantee of access to Justice and how this provision has been taking place as a public service, based on the premise of the complexity of today's society and its multiple legal relationships, desires, expectations and demands, in an environment of permanent social, political and economic conflicts, which leads to the inevitable judicialization of social relations and the crisis of the Judiciary. Recognizing the impossibility of putting an end to the plethora of demands submitted to the Judiciary's judgment, access to Justice goes through a process of expansion and conceptual enlargement comprising new dimensions, entailing the offer of adequate means of conflict resolution, emerging mediation as a mechanism with the greatest potential to strengthen citizenship. To find an answer to the proposed problem, the analytical-dogmatic method is used, comparing the consensual means of resolving conflicts with the solution awarded through provocation of the state jurisdiction, through bibliographic and documentary research. It starts from the analysis of the justice system in Brazil at its current stage, recognizing the conservation of the state-centric position in the production of legal norms, however, based on a logical-inductive argument, it is proposed the hypothesis that the consensual means of conflict resolution and prevention, especially mediation, can serve as a mechanism for exercising and consolidating citizenship and strengthening community ties. |
id |
UFG-14_0c48b22c6dd42f71fc8cd8e0687451b3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/68261 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-14 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND CITIZENSHIP: HOW CONSENSUAL MEANS OF SOLUTION AND CONFLICT PREVENTION CAN STRENGTHEN CITIZENSHIP AND RESTORE COMMUNITY TIESACESSO À JUSTIÇA E CIDADANIA: DE COMO OS MEIOS CONSENSUAIS DE SOLUÇÃO E PREVENÇÃO DE CONFLITOS PODEM FORTALECER A CIDADANIA E RESTAURAR OS LAÇOS COMUNITÁRIOS.CONFLICTS.RESOLUTION.ADEQUATE MEANS.JUDICIALIZATIONJUDICIARY POWER.CONFLITOS.SOLUÇÃO.MEIOS ADEQUADOSJUDICIALIZAÇÃO.PODER JUDICIÁRIO. The present study investigates whether consensual means of conflict solution constitute denial of jurisdiction or, instead, represent a paradigmatic change that can serve to strengthen citizenship and democracy. It analyzes the constitutional guarantee of access to Justice and how this provision has been taking place as a public service, based on the premise of the complexity of today's society and its multiple legal relationships, desires, expectations and demands, in an environment of permanent social, political and economic conflicts, which leads to the inevitable judicialization of social relations and the crisis of the Judiciary. Recognizing the impossibility of putting an end to the plethora of demands submitted to the Judiciary's judgment, access to Justice goes through a process of expansion and conceptual enlargement comprising new dimensions, entailing the offer of adequate means of conflict resolution, emerging mediation as a mechanism with the greatest potential to strengthen citizenship. To find an answer to the proposed problem, the analytical-dogmatic method is used, comparing the consensual means of resolving conflicts with the solution awarded through provocation of the state jurisdiction, through bibliographic and documentary research. It starts from the analysis of the justice system in Brazil at its current stage, recognizing the conservation of the state-centric position in the production of legal norms, however, based on a logical-inductive argument, it is proposed the hypothesis that the consensual means of conflict resolution and prevention, especially mediation, can serve as a mechanism for exercising and consolidating citizenship and strengthening community ties.O presente trabalho investiga se os meios de solução consensual de conflitos constituem negativa de jurisdição ou, ao revés, mostram-se como uma mudança paradigmática que pode servir para o fortalecimento da cidadania e da democracia. Analisa-se a garantia constitucional do acesso à Justiça e como vem se dando essa prestação enquanto serviço público, partindo da premissa da complexidade da sociedade atual e suas múltiplas relações jurídicas, anseios, desejos e reivindicações, num ambiente de permanentes conflitos sociais, políticos e econômicos, levando à inevitável judicialização das relações sociais e a crise do Poder Judiciário. Reconhecendo a impossibilidade de dar cobro à pletora de feitos submetidos ao julgamento do Judiciário, o acesso à Justiça passa por um processo de expansão e alargamento conceitual compreendendo novas dimensões, acarretando o oferecimento dos meios adequados de solução e prevenção de conflitos, despontando a mediação como mecanismo com maior potencial de fortalecimento da cidadania. Buscando encontrar resposta ao problema proposto, utiliza-se o método analítico-dogmático, comparando aos meios consensuais de solução de conflitos com a solução adjudicada mediante provocação da jurisdição estatal, através de pesquisa bibliográfica e documental. Parte-se da análise do sistema de justiça no Brasil em seu o estágio atual, reconhecendo a conservação da posição estadocêntrica na produção de normas jurídicas, porém, a partir de argumento lógico-indutivo, propõe-se a hipótese de que os meios consensuais de solução e prevenção de conflito, mais potentemente a mediação, podem servir de mecanismo de exercício e consolidação da cidadania e fortalecimento dos laços comunitários.Universidade Federal de Goiás2022-03-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliação por "double-blind review"application/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/6826110.5216/rfd.v45i2.68261Revista Facultad de Derecho UFG; Vol. 45 Núm. 2 (2021): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFGMagazine de la faculté de droit UFG; Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFGRevista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG; v. 45 n. 2 (2021): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFG0101-7187reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/68261/38065Ivo, JasielTeixeira, Sérgio Torresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-09-15T21:15:11Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/68261Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/revfdPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/oaimcvidotte@gmail.com || rfdufg@gmail.com2317-67330101-7187opendoar:2023-09-15T21:15:11Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND CITIZENSHIP: HOW CONSENSUAL MEANS OF SOLUTION AND CONFLICT PREVENTION CAN STRENGTHEN CITIZENSHIP AND RESTORE COMMUNITY TIES ACESSO À JUSTIÇA E CIDADANIA: DE COMO OS MEIOS CONSENSUAIS DE SOLUÇÃO E PREVENÇÃO DE CONFLITOS PODEM FORTALECER A CIDADANIA E RESTAURAR OS LAÇOS COMUNITÁRIOS. |
title |
ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND CITIZENSHIP: HOW CONSENSUAL MEANS OF SOLUTION AND CONFLICT PREVENTION CAN STRENGTHEN CITIZENSHIP AND RESTORE COMMUNITY TIES |
spellingShingle |
ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND CITIZENSHIP: HOW CONSENSUAL MEANS OF SOLUTION AND CONFLICT PREVENTION CAN STRENGTHEN CITIZENSHIP AND RESTORE COMMUNITY TIES Ivo, Jasiel CONFLICTS. RESOLUTION. ADEQUATE MEANS. JUDICIALIZATION JUDICIARY POWER. CONFLITOS. SOLUÇÃO. MEIOS ADEQUADOS JUDICIALIZAÇÃO. PODER JUDICIÁRIO. |
title_short |
ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND CITIZENSHIP: HOW CONSENSUAL MEANS OF SOLUTION AND CONFLICT PREVENTION CAN STRENGTHEN CITIZENSHIP AND RESTORE COMMUNITY TIES |
title_full |
ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND CITIZENSHIP: HOW CONSENSUAL MEANS OF SOLUTION AND CONFLICT PREVENTION CAN STRENGTHEN CITIZENSHIP AND RESTORE COMMUNITY TIES |
title_fullStr |
ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND CITIZENSHIP: HOW CONSENSUAL MEANS OF SOLUTION AND CONFLICT PREVENTION CAN STRENGTHEN CITIZENSHIP AND RESTORE COMMUNITY TIES |
title_full_unstemmed |
ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND CITIZENSHIP: HOW CONSENSUAL MEANS OF SOLUTION AND CONFLICT PREVENTION CAN STRENGTHEN CITIZENSHIP AND RESTORE COMMUNITY TIES |
title_sort |
ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND CITIZENSHIP: HOW CONSENSUAL MEANS OF SOLUTION AND CONFLICT PREVENTION CAN STRENGTHEN CITIZENSHIP AND RESTORE COMMUNITY TIES |
author |
Ivo, Jasiel |
author_facet |
Ivo, Jasiel Teixeira, Sérgio Torres |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Teixeira, Sérgio Torres |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ivo, Jasiel Teixeira, Sérgio Torres |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
CONFLICTS. RESOLUTION. ADEQUATE MEANS. JUDICIALIZATION JUDICIARY POWER. CONFLITOS. SOLUÇÃO. MEIOS ADEQUADOS JUDICIALIZAÇÃO. PODER JUDICIÁRIO. |
topic |
CONFLICTS. RESOLUTION. ADEQUATE MEANS. JUDICIALIZATION JUDICIARY POWER. CONFLITOS. SOLUÇÃO. MEIOS ADEQUADOS JUDICIALIZAÇÃO. PODER JUDICIÁRIO. |
description |
The present study investigates whether consensual means of conflict solution constitute denial of jurisdiction or, instead, represent a paradigmatic change that can serve to strengthen citizenship and democracy. It analyzes the constitutional guarantee of access to Justice and how this provision has been taking place as a public service, based on the premise of the complexity of today's society and its multiple legal relationships, desires, expectations and demands, in an environment of permanent social, political and economic conflicts, which leads to the inevitable judicialization of social relations and the crisis of the Judiciary. Recognizing the impossibility of putting an end to the plethora of demands submitted to the Judiciary's judgment, access to Justice goes through a process of expansion and conceptual enlargement comprising new dimensions, entailing the offer of adequate means of conflict resolution, emerging mediation as a mechanism with the greatest potential to strengthen citizenship. To find an answer to the proposed problem, the analytical-dogmatic method is used, comparing the consensual means of resolving conflicts with the solution awarded through provocation of the state jurisdiction, through bibliographic and documentary research. It starts from the analysis of the justice system in Brazil at its current stage, recognizing the conservation of the state-centric position in the production of legal norms, however, based on a logical-inductive argument, it is proposed the hypothesis that the consensual means of conflict resolution and prevention, especially mediation, can serve as a mechanism for exercising and consolidating citizenship and strengthening community ties. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliação por "double-blind review" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/68261 10.5216/rfd.v45i2.68261 |
url |
https://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/68261 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5216/rfd.v45i2.68261 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/68261/38065 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Facultad de Derecho UFG; Vol. 45 Núm. 2 (2021): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFG Magazine de la faculté de droit UFG; Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFG Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG; v. 45 n. 2 (2021): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFG 0101-7187 reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mcvidotte@gmail.com || rfdufg@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1796798165754576896 |