Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vieira, Luciano da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFG
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/10520
Resumo: Rhipicephalus microplus is one of the main ectoparasites of economic importance for cattle in tropical and subtropical regions, causing drop in milk production and transmitting pathogenic agents such as Anaplasma and Babesia. Therefore, constant studies on treatment schemes for parasite control are necessary to minimize the damage and losses that follow infestations by this arthropod. In this way, the present study aimed to compare two methods for R. microplus control, the strategic method and the selective method, in dairy cattle herds, aiming to provide support to the technical guidelines on the most efficient control method of the parasitic load. In the strategic method, seven treatments with spray acaricides were carried out every 21 days, starting in November. In the selective method, treatments with acaricides were performed only on animals that had an infestation equal to or greater than 40 engorged females. Only 5% of animals submitted to the selective method received treatment in November. The average of tick counts was lower in the strategic method compared to the selective method, in December. The maximum peak of infestation occurred in January, in both control methods, with no significant difference, persisting until February. No animal of the strategic method had an infestation greater than 40 engorged females in March. However, the parasitic load in both control methods was similar in the second evaluation in March. The averages of counts in the strategic method were lower in the months of April (10.9) and May (16.9) compared to the averages observed in the selective method (56.3 and 48.4). Yet, it was necessary to carry out tactical treatments in the strategic method, after the treatment scheme, in up to 16.7% of the animals in April and up to 50.0% in May, while in the selective method, the treatments varied from 42.8 to 88.8% in April and in May it varied from 28.6 to 75.0%. The total count of R. microplus was 5,036 engorged females in the strategic method, while in the selective method there were 13,829 engorged females in the study period. Therefore, it is concluded that the treatment scheme for control of R. microplus significantly interfered in the parasitic load of dairy cows, favouring the maintenance of acceptable levels of parasitism when the strategic method of tick control was implemented compared to the adoption of the selective method.
id UFG-2_499d556b2a5d9f63e1cd5bd2530442e1
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/10520
network_acronym_str UFG-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFG
repository_id_str
spelling Borges, Lígia Miranda Ferreirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2591106734434348Cotta, Viviane Zeringóta Rodrigueshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4269635925947346Monteiro, Caio Márcio de Oliveirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2496419306394657Borges, Lígia Miranda FerreiraCotta, Viviane Zeringóta RodriguesMonteiro, Caio Márcio de OliveiraLouly, Carla Cristina BrazLopes, Wélber Daniel Zanettihttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4735986261035685Vieira, Luciano da Silva2020-08-31T15:01:08Z2020-08-31T15:01:08Z2020-03-02VIEIRA, L. S. Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros. 2020. 52 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência Animal) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2020.http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/10520Rhipicephalus microplus is one of the main ectoparasites of economic importance for cattle in tropical and subtropical regions, causing drop in milk production and transmitting pathogenic agents such as Anaplasma and Babesia. Therefore, constant studies on treatment schemes for parasite control are necessary to minimize the damage and losses that follow infestations by this arthropod. In this way, the present study aimed to compare two methods for R. microplus control, the strategic method and the selective method, in dairy cattle herds, aiming to provide support to the technical guidelines on the most efficient control method of the parasitic load. In the strategic method, seven treatments with spray acaricides were carried out every 21 days, starting in November. In the selective method, treatments with acaricides were performed only on animals that had an infestation equal to or greater than 40 engorged females. Only 5% of animals submitted to the selective method received treatment in November. The average of tick counts was lower in the strategic method compared to the selective method, in December. The maximum peak of infestation occurred in January, in both control methods, with no significant difference, persisting until February. No animal of the strategic method had an infestation greater than 40 engorged females in March. However, the parasitic load in both control methods was similar in the second evaluation in March. The averages of counts in the strategic method were lower in the months of April (10.9) and May (16.9) compared to the averages observed in the selective method (56.3 and 48.4). Yet, it was necessary to carry out tactical treatments in the strategic method, after the treatment scheme, in up to 16.7% of the animals in April and up to 50.0% in May, while in the selective method, the treatments varied from 42.8 to 88.8% in April and in May it varied from 28.6 to 75.0%. The total count of R. microplus was 5,036 engorged females in the strategic method, while in the selective method there were 13,829 engorged females in the study period. Therefore, it is concluded that the treatment scheme for control of R. microplus significantly interfered in the parasitic load of dairy cows, favouring the maintenance of acceptable levels of parasitism when the strategic method of tick control was implemented compared to the adoption of the selective method.Rhipicephalus microplus é um dos principais ectoparasitos de importância econômica de bovinos nas regiões tropicais e subtropicais, causando queda da produção leiteira e transmissão de agentes patogênicos da Tristeza Parasitária Bovina (TPB). Por isso, constantes estudos sobre esquemas de tratamentos para controle do parasito são necessários para minimizar os prejuízos que acompanham as infestações por este artrópode. Desta maneira, o presente estudo teve como objetivo a comparação entre dois métodos de controle de R. microplus, o método estratégico e o método seletivo, em rebanhos de bovino leiteiro, visando fornecer sustentação às orientações técnicas sobre o método de controle mais eficiente sobre a carga parasitária. No método estratégico foram realizados sete tratamentos com acaricidas de pulverização, a cada 21 dias, iniciados em novembro. No método seletivo foram realizados tratamentos com acaricidas apenas nos animais que apresentavam uma infestação igual ou superior a 40 fêmeas ingurgitadas. Somente 5% dos animais submetidos ao método seletivo receberam tratamento em novembro. As médias de contagens de carrapatos foram menores no método estratégico em relação ao método seletivo, em dezembro. O pico máximo de infestação ocorreu em janeiro, em ambos os métodos de controle, persistindo até fevereiro. Nenhum animal do método estratégico apresentou infestação superior a 40 fêmeas ingurgitadas em março. No entanto, a carga parasitária em ambos os métodos de controle foi similar em uma segunda avaliação no mês de março. As médias de contagens no método estratégico foram menores nos meses de abril (10,9) e maio (16,9) em comparação às médias observadas no método seletivo de 56,3 e 48,4. Foi necessária a realização de tratamentos táticos no método estratégico, após o esquema de tratamentos, em até 16,7% dos animais em abril e até 50,0% em maio, enquanto no método seletivo, os tratamentos variaram de 42,8 a 88,8% em abril e em maio variou de 28,6 a 75,0%. A contagem total de R. microplus foi de 5.036 fêmeas ingurgitadas no método estratégico, enquanto o método seletivo apresentou contagem de 13.829 fêmeas ingurgitadas, no período de estudo. Portanto conclui-se que o esquema de tratamentos para controle de R microplus interferiu significativamente na carga parasitária das vacas em lactação, favorecendo a manutenção de níveis aceitáveis de parasitismo quando implementado o método estratégico de controle do carrapato em comparação à adoção do método seletivo.Submitted by Franciele Moreira (francielemoreyra@gmail.com) on 2020-08-31T13:14:46Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 811 bytes, checksum: e39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34 (MD5) Dissertação - Luciano da Silva Vieira - 2020.pdf: 2948077 bytes, checksum: dc9f91c66954a0f2fb8e1c972e9f1ce2 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2020-08-31T15:01:07Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 811 bytes, checksum: e39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34 (MD5) Dissertação - Luciano da Silva Vieira - 2020.pdf: 2948077 bytes, checksum: dc9f91c66954a0f2fb8e1c972e9f1ce2 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2020-08-31T15:01:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 811 bytes, checksum: e39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34 (MD5) Dissertação - Luciano da Silva Vieira - 2020.pdf: 2948077 bytes, checksum: dc9f91c66954a0f2fb8e1c972e9f1ce2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020-03-02application/pdfporUniversidade Federal de GoiásPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciência Animal (EVZ)UFGBrasilEscola de Veterinária e Zootecnia - EVZ (RG)Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcaricidaBrasilCarrapato do bovinoTristeza parasitária bovinaAcaricideBrazilCattle tickCattle fever tickAnaplasmosisCIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIAComparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteirosComparison of the strategic and selective control methods into parasitic loads of Rhipicephalus microplus in dairy cattle herdsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis4581960685150189167600600600-6217552114249094582453670264235017319reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFGinstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8811http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/d1229dc3-a375-4118-9f17-c78a947377c2/downloade39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34MD53LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/daede42b-b95c-4793-8083-5e573ad5bbae/downloadbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51ORIGINALDissertação - Luciano da Silva Vieira - 2020.pdfDissertação - Luciano da Silva Vieira - 2020.pdfapplication/pdf2948077http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/fb78d6b6-9531-4973-904e-319c5c3fdd32/downloaddc9f91c66954a0f2fb8e1c972e9f1ce2MD52tede/105202020-08-31 12:01:08.195http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/Acesso Abertoopen.accessoai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/10520http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tedeRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/oai/requesttasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.bropendoar:2020-08-31T15:01:08Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)falseTk9UQTogQ09MT1FVRSBBUVVJIEEgU1VBIFBSw5NQUklBIExJQ0VOw4dBCkVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EgZGUgZXhlbXBsbyDDqSBmb3JuZWNpZGEgYXBlbmFzIHBhcmEgZmlucyBpbmZvcm1hdGl2b3MuCgpMSUNFTsOHQSBERSBESVNUUklCVUnDh8ODTyBOw4NPLUVYQ0xVU0lWQQoKQ29tIGEgYXByZXNlbnRhw6fDo28gZGVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EsIHZvY8OqIChvIGF1dG9yIChlcykgb3UgbyB0aXR1bGFyIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBkZSBhdXRvcikgY29uY2VkZSDDoCBVbml2ZXJzaWRhZGUgClhYWCAoU2lnbGEgZGEgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlKSBvIGRpcmVpdG8gbsOjby1leGNsdXNpdm8gZGUgcmVwcm9kdXppciwgIHRyYWR1emlyIChjb25mb3JtZSBkZWZpbmlkbyBhYmFpeG8pLCBlL291IApkaXN0cmlidWlyIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyAoaW5jbHVpbmRvIG8gcmVzdW1vKSBwb3IgdG9kbyBvIG11bmRvIG5vIGZvcm1hdG8gaW1wcmVzc28gZSBlbGV0csO0bmljbyBlIAplbSBxdWFscXVlciBtZWlvLCBpbmNsdWluZG8gb3MgZm9ybWF0b3Mgw6F1ZGlvIG91IHbDrWRlby4KClZvY8OqIGNvbmNvcmRhIHF1ZSBhIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSBwb2RlLCBzZW0gYWx0ZXJhciBvIGNvbnRlw7pkbywgdHJhbnNwb3IgYSBzdWEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIApwYXJhIHF1YWxxdWVyIG1laW8gb3UgZm9ybWF0byBwYXJhIGZpbnMgZGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gY29uY29yZGEgcXVlIGEgU2lnbGEgZGUgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlIHBvZGUgbWFudGVyIG1haXMgZGUgdW1hIGPDs3BpYSBhIHN1YSB0ZXNlIG91IApkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIHBhcmEgZmlucyBkZSBzZWd1cmFuw6dhLCBiYWNrLXVwIGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIGRlY2xhcmEgcXVlIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyDDqSBvcmlnaW5hbCBlIHF1ZSB2b2PDqiB0ZW0gbyBwb2RlciBkZSBjb25jZWRlciBvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBjb250aWRvcyAKbmVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EuIFZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgbyBkZXDDs3NpdG8gZGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyBuw6NvLCBxdWUgc2VqYSBkZSBzZXUgCmNvbmhlY2ltZW50bywgaW5mcmluZ2UgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgZGUgbmluZ3XDqW0uCgpDYXNvIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyBjb250ZW5oYSBtYXRlcmlhbCBxdWUgdm9jw6ogbsOjbyBwb3NzdWkgYSB0aXR1bGFyaWRhZGUgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzLCB2b2PDqiAKZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgb2J0ZXZlIGEgcGVybWlzc8OjbyBpcnJlc3RyaXRhIGRvIGRldGVudG9yIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcyBwYXJhIGNvbmNlZGVyIMOgIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSAKb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXByZXNlbnRhZG9zIG5lc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLCBlIHF1ZSBlc3NlIG1hdGVyaWFsIGRlIHByb3ByaWVkYWRlIGRlIHRlcmNlaXJvcyBlc3TDoSBjbGFyYW1lbnRlIAppZGVudGlmaWNhZG8gZSByZWNvbmhlY2lkbyBubyB0ZXh0byBvdSBubyBjb250ZcO6ZG8gZGEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIG9yYSBkZXBvc2l0YWRhLgoKQ0FTTyBBIFRFU0UgT1UgRElTU0VSVEHDh8ODTyBPUkEgREVQT1NJVEFEQSBURU5IQSBTSURPIFJFU1VMVEFETyBERSBVTSBQQVRST0PDjU5JTyBPVSAKQVBPSU8gREUgVU1BIEFHw4pOQ0lBIERFIEZPTUVOVE8gT1UgT1VUUk8gT1JHQU5JU01PIFFVRSBOw4NPIFNFSkEgQSBTSUdMQSBERSAKVU5JVkVSU0lEQURFLCBWT0PDiiBERUNMQVJBIFFVRSBSRVNQRUlUT1UgVE9ET1MgRSBRVUFJU1FVRVIgRElSRUlUT1MgREUgUkVWSVPDg08gQ09NTyAKVEFNQsOJTSBBUyBERU1BSVMgT0JSSUdBw4fDlUVTIEVYSUdJREFTIFBPUiBDT05UUkFUTyBPVSBBQ09SRE8uCgpBIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSBzZSBjb21wcm9tZXRlIGEgaWRlbnRpZmljYXIgY2xhcmFtZW50ZSBvIHNldSBub21lIChzKSBvdSBvKHMpIG5vbWUocykgZG8ocykgCmRldGVudG9yKGVzKSBkb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgZGEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvLCBlIG7Do28gZmFyw6EgcXVhbHF1ZXIgYWx0ZXJhw6fDo28sIGFsw6ltIGRhcXVlbGFzIApjb25jZWRpZGFzIHBvciBlc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLgo=
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Comparison of the strategic and selective control methods into parasitic loads of Rhipicephalus microplus in dairy cattle herds
title Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros
spellingShingle Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros
Vieira, Luciano da Silva
Acaricida
Brasil
Carrapato do bovino
Tristeza parasitária bovina
Acaricide
Brazil
Cattle tick
Cattle fever tick
Anaplasmosis
CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA
title_short Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros
title_full Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros
title_fullStr Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros
title_full_unstemmed Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros
title_sort Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros
author Vieira, Luciano da Silva
author_facet Vieira, Luciano da Silva
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Borges, Lígia Miranda Ferreira
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/2591106734434348
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv Cotta, Viviane Zeringóta Rodrigues
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4269635925947346
dc.contributor.advisor-co2.fl_str_mv Monteiro, Caio Márcio de Oliveira
dc.contributor.advisor-co2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/2496419306394657
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Borges, Lígia Miranda Ferreira
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Cotta, Viviane Zeringóta Rodrigues
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Monteiro, Caio Márcio de Oliveira
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv Louly, Carla Cristina Braz
dc.contributor.referee5.fl_str_mv Lopes, Wélber Daniel Zanetti
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4735986261035685
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vieira, Luciano da Silva
contributor_str_mv Borges, Lígia Miranda Ferreira
Cotta, Viviane Zeringóta Rodrigues
Monteiro, Caio Márcio de Oliveira
Borges, Lígia Miranda Ferreira
Cotta, Viviane Zeringóta Rodrigues
Monteiro, Caio Márcio de Oliveira
Louly, Carla Cristina Braz
Lopes, Wélber Daniel Zanetti
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Acaricida
Brasil
Carrapato do bovino
Tristeza parasitária bovina
topic Acaricida
Brasil
Carrapato do bovino
Tristeza parasitária bovina
Acaricide
Brazil
Cattle tick
Cattle fever tick
Anaplasmosis
CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Acaricide
Brazil
Cattle tick
Cattle fever tick
Anaplasmosis
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA
description Rhipicephalus microplus is one of the main ectoparasites of economic importance for cattle in tropical and subtropical regions, causing drop in milk production and transmitting pathogenic agents such as Anaplasma and Babesia. Therefore, constant studies on treatment schemes for parasite control are necessary to minimize the damage and losses that follow infestations by this arthropod. In this way, the present study aimed to compare two methods for R. microplus control, the strategic method and the selective method, in dairy cattle herds, aiming to provide support to the technical guidelines on the most efficient control method of the parasitic load. In the strategic method, seven treatments with spray acaricides were carried out every 21 days, starting in November. In the selective method, treatments with acaricides were performed only on animals that had an infestation equal to or greater than 40 engorged females. Only 5% of animals submitted to the selective method received treatment in November. The average of tick counts was lower in the strategic method compared to the selective method, in December. The maximum peak of infestation occurred in January, in both control methods, with no significant difference, persisting until February. No animal of the strategic method had an infestation greater than 40 engorged females in March. However, the parasitic load in both control methods was similar in the second evaluation in March. The averages of counts in the strategic method were lower in the months of April (10.9) and May (16.9) compared to the averages observed in the selective method (56.3 and 48.4). Yet, it was necessary to carry out tactical treatments in the strategic method, after the treatment scheme, in up to 16.7% of the animals in April and up to 50.0% in May, while in the selective method, the treatments varied from 42.8 to 88.8% in April and in May it varied from 28.6 to 75.0%. The total count of R. microplus was 5,036 engorged females in the strategic method, while in the selective method there were 13,829 engorged females in the study period. Therefore, it is concluded that the treatment scheme for control of R. microplus significantly interfered in the parasitic load of dairy cows, favouring the maintenance of acceptable levels of parasitism when the strategic method of tick control was implemented compared to the adoption of the selective method.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-08-31T15:01:08Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2020-08-31T15:01:08Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2020-03-02
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv VIEIRA, L. S. Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros. 2020. 52 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência Animal) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2020.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/10520
identifier_str_mv VIEIRA, L. S. Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros. 2020. 52 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência Animal) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2020.
url http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/10520
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv 4581960685150189167
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv -6217552114249094582
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 453670264235017319
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência Animal (EVZ)
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFG
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia - EVZ (RG)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFG
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFG
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/d1229dc3-a375-4118-9f17-c78a947377c2/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/daede42b-b95c-4793-8083-5e573ad5bbae/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/fb78d6b6-9531-4973-904e-319c5c3fdd32/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv e39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
dc9f91c66954a0f2fb8e1c972e9f1ce2
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.br
_version_ 1798044361115566080