Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFG |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/10520 |
Resumo: | Rhipicephalus microplus is one of the main ectoparasites of economic importance for cattle in tropical and subtropical regions, causing drop in milk production and transmitting pathogenic agents such as Anaplasma and Babesia. Therefore, constant studies on treatment schemes for parasite control are necessary to minimize the damage and losses that follow infestations by this arthropod. In this way, the present study aimed to compare two methods for R. microplus control, the strategic method and the selective method, in dairy cattle herds, aiming to provide support to the technical guidelines on the most efficient control method of the parasitic load. In the strategic method, seven treatments with spray acaricides were carried out every 21 days, starting in November. In the selective method, treatments with acaricides were performed only on animals that had an infestation equal to or greater than 40 engorged females. Only 5% of animals submitted to the selective method received treatment in November. The average of tick counts was lower in the strategic method compared to the selective method, in December. The maximum peak of infestation occurred in January, in both control methods, with no significant difference, persisting until February. No animal of the strategic method had an infestation greater than 40 engorged females in March. However, the parasitic load in both control methods was similar in the second evaluation in March. The averages of counts in the strategic method were lower in the months of April (10.9) and May (16.9) compared to the averages observed in the selective method (56.3 and 48.4). Yet, it was necessary to carry out tactical treatments in the strategic method, after the treatment scheme, in up to 16.7% of the animals in April and up to 50.0% in May, while in the selective method, the treatments varied from 42.8 to 88.8% in April and in May it varied from 28.6 to 75.0%. The total count of R. microplus was 5,036 engorged females in the strategic method, while in the selective method there were 13,829 engorged females in the study period. Therefore, it is concluded that the treatment scheme for control of R. microplus significantly interfered in the parasitic load of dairy cows, favouring the maintenance of acceptable levels of parasitism when the strategic method of tick control was implemented compared to the adoption of the selective method. |
id |
UFG-2_499d556b2a5d9f63e1cd5bd2530442e1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/10520 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFG |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Borges, Lígia Miranda Ferreirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2591106734434348Cotta, Viviane Zeringóta Rodrigueshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4269635925947346Monteiro, Caio Márcio de Oliveirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2496419306394657Borges, Lígia Miranda FerreiraCotta, Viviane Zeringóta RodriguesMonteiro, Caio Márcio de OliveiraLouly, Carla Cristina BrazLopes, Wélber Daniel Zanettihttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4735986261035685Vieira, Luciano da Silva2020-08-31T15:01:08Z2020-08-31T15:01:08Z2020-03-02VIEIRA, L. S. Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros. 2020. 52 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência Animal) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2020.http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/10520Rhipicephalus microplus is one of the main ectoparasites of economic importance for cattle in tropical and subtropical regions, causing drop in milk production and transmitting pathogenic agents such as Anaplasma and Babesia. Therefore, constant studies on treatment schemes for parasite control are necessary to minimize the damage and losses that follow infestations by this arthropod. In this way, the present study aimed to compare two methods for R. microplus control, the strategic method and the selective method, in dairy cattle herds, aiming to provide support to the technical guidelines on the most efficient control method of the parasitic load. In the strategic method, seven treatments with spray acaricides were carried out every 21 days, starting in November. In the selective method, treatments with acaricides were performed only on animals that had an infestation equal to or greater than 40 engorged females. Only 5% of animals submitted to the selective method received treatment in November. The average of tick counts was lower in the strategic method compared to the selective method, in December. The maximum peak of infestation occurred in January, in both control methods, with no significant difference, persisting until February. No animal of the strategic method had an infestation greater than 40 engorged females in March. However, the parasitic load in both control methods was similar in the second evaluation in March. The averages of counts in the strategic method were lower in the months of April (10.9) and May (16.9) compared to the averages observed in the selective method (56.3 and 48.4). Yet, it was necessary to carry out tactical treatments in the strategic method, after the treatment scheme, in up to 16.7% of the animals in April and up to 50.0% in May, while in the selective method, the treatments varied from 42.8 to 88.8% in April and in May it varied from 28.6 to 75.0%. The total count of R. microplus was 5,036 engorged females in the strategic method, while in the selective method there were 13,829 engorged females in the study period. Therefore, it is concluded that the treatment scheme for control of R. microplus significantly interfered in the parasitic load of dairy cows, favouring the maintenance of acceptable levels of parasitism when the strategic method of tick control was implemented compared to the adoption of the selective method.Rhipicephalus microplus é um dos principais ectoparasitos de importância econômica de bovinos nas regiões tropicais e subtropicais, causando queda da produção leiteira e transmissão de agentes patogênicos da Tristeza Parasitária Bovina (TPB). Por isso, constantes estudos sobre esquemas de tratamentos para controle do parasito são necessários para minimizar os prejuízos que acompanham as infestações por este artrópode. Desta maneira, o presente estudo teve como objetivo a comparação entre dois métodos de controle de R. microplus, o método estratégico e o método seletivo, em rebanhos de bovino leiteiro, visando fornecer sustentação às orientações técnicas sobre o método de controle mais eficiente sobre a carga parasitária. No método estratégico foram realizados sete tratamentos com acaricidas de pulverização, a cada 21 dias, iniciados em novembro. No método seletivo foram realizados tratamentos com acaricidas apenas nos animais que apresentavam uma infestação igual ou superior a 40 fêmeas ingurgitadas. Somente 5% dos animais submetidos ao método seletivo receberam tratamento em novembro. As médias de contagens de carrapatos foram menores no método estratégico em relação ao método seletivo, em dezembro. O pico máximo de infestação ocorreu em janeiro, em ambos os métodos de controle, persistindo até fevereiro. Nenhum animal do método estratégico apresentou infestação superior a 40 fêmeas ingurgitadas em março. No entanto, a carga parasitária em ambos os métodos de controle foi similar em uma segunda avaliação no mês de março. As médias de contagens no método estratégico foram menores nos meses de abril (10,9) e maio (16,9) em comparação às médias observadas no método seletivo de 56,3 e 48,4. Foi necessária a realização de tratamentos táticos no método estratégico, após o esquema de tratamentos, em até 16,7% dos animais em abril e até 50,0% em maio, enquanto no método seletivo, os tratamentos variaram de 42,8 a 88,8% em abril e em maio variou de 28,6 a 75,0%. A contagem total de R. microplus foi de 5.036 fêmeas ingurgitadas no método estratégico, enquanto o método seletivo apresentou contagem de 13.829 fêmeas ingurgitadas, no período de estudo. Portanto conclui-se que o esquema de tratamentos para controle de R microplus interferiu significativamente na carga parasitária das vacas em lactação, favorecendo a manutenção de níveis aceitáveis de parasitismo quando implementado o método estratégico de controle do carrapato em comparação à adoção do método seletivo.Submitted by Franciele Moreira (francielemoreyra@gmail.com) on 2020-08-31T13:14:46Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 811 bytes, checksum: e39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34 (MD5) Dissertação - Luciano da Silva Vieira - 2020.pdf: 2948077 bytes, checksum: dc9f91c66954a0f2fb8e1c972e9f1ce2 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2020-08-31T15:01:07Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 811 bytes, checksum: e39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34 (MD5) Dissertação - Luciano da Silva Vieira - 2020.pdf: 2948077 bytes, checksum: dc9f91c66954a0f2fb8e1c972e9f1ce2 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2020-08-31T15:01:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 811 bytes, checksum: e39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34 (MD5) Dissertação - Luciano da Silva Vieira - 2020.pdf: 2948077 bytes, checksum: dc9f91c66954a0f2fb8e1c972e9f1ce2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020-03-02application/pdfporUniversidade Federal de GoiásPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciência Animal (EVZ)UFGBrasilEscola de Veterinária e Zootecnia - EVZ (RG)Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcaricidaBrasilCarrapato do bovinoTristeza parasitária bovinaAcaricideBrazilCattle tickCattle fever tickAnaplasmosisCIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIAComparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteirosComparison of the strategic and selective control methods into parasitic loads of Rhipicephalus microplus in dairy cattle herdsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis4581960685150189167600600600-6217552114249094582453670264235017319reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFGinstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8811http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/d1229dc3-a375-4118-9f17-c78a947377c2/downloade39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34MD53LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/daede42b-b95c-4793-8083-5e573ad5bbae/downloadbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51ORIGINALDissertação - Luciano da Silva Vieira - 2020.pdfDissertação - Luciano da Silva Vieira - 2020.pdfapplication/pdf2948077http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/fb78d6b6-9531-4973-904e-319c5c3fdd32/downloaddc9f91c66954a0f2fb8e1c972e9f1ce2MD52tede/105202020-08-31 12:01:08.195http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/Acesso Abertoopen.accessoai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/10520http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tedeRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/oai/requesttasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.bropendoar:2020-08-31T15:01:08Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)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 |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of the strategic and selective control methods into parasitic loads of Rhipicephalus microplus in dairy cattle herds |
title |
Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros |
spellingShingle |
Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros Vieira, Luciano da Silva Acaricida Brasil Carrapato do bovino Tristeza parasitária bovina Acaricide Brazil Cattle tick Cattle fever tick Anaplasmosis CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA |
title_short |
Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros |
title_full |
Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros |
title_fullStr |
Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros |
title_sort |
Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros |
author |
Vieira, Luciano da Silva |
author_facet |
Vieira, Luciano da Silva |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Borges, Lígia Miranda Ferreira |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2591106734434348 |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
Cotta, Viviane Zeringóta Rodrigues |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4269635925947346 |
dc.contributor.advisor-co2.fl_str_mv |
Monteiro, Caio Márcio de Oliveira |
dc.contributor.advisor-co2Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2496419306394657 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Borges, Lígia Miranda Ferreira |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Cotta, Viviane Zeringóta Rodrigues |
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv |
Monteiro, Caio Márcio de Oliveira |
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv |
Louly, Carla Cristina Braz |
dc.contributor.referee5.fl_str_mv |
Lopes, Wélber Daniel Zanetti |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4735986261035685 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vieira, Luciano da Silva |
contributor_str_mv |
Borges, Lígia Miranda Ferreira Cotta, Viviane Zeringóta Rodrigues Monteiro, Caio Márcio de Oliveira Borges, Lígia Miranda Ferreira Cotta, Viviane Zeringóta Rodrigues Monteiro, Caio Márcio de Oliveira Louly, Carla Cristina Braz Lopes, Wélber Daniel Zanetti |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Acaricida Brasil Carrapato do bovino Tristeza parasitária bovina |
topic |
Acaricida Brasil Carrapato do bovino Tristeza parasitária bovina Acaricide Brazil Cattle tick Cattle fever tick Anaplasmosis CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Acaricide Brazil Cattle tick Cattle fever tick Anaplasmosis |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA |
description |
Rhipicephalus microplus is one of the main ectoparasites of economic importance for cattle in tropical and subtropical regions, causing drop in milk production and transmitting pathogenic agents such as Anaplasma and Babesia. Therefore, constant studies on treatment schemes for parasite control are necessary to minimize the damage and losses that follow infestations by this arthropod. In this way, the present study aimed to compare two methods for R. microplus control, the strategic method and the selective method, in dairy cattle herds, aiming to provide support to the technical guidelines on the most efficient control method of the parasitic load. In the strategic method, seven treatments with spray acaricides were carried out every 21 days, starting in November. In the selective method, treatments with acaricides were performed only on animals that had an infestation equal to or greater than 40 engorged females. Only 5% of animals submitted to the selective method received treatment in November. The average of tick counts was lower in the strategic method compared to the selective method, in December. The maximum peak of infestation occurred in January, in both control methods, with no significant difference, persisting until February. No animal of the strategic method had an infestation greater than 40 engorged females in March. However, the parasitic load in both control methods was similar in the second evaluation in March. The averages of counts in the strategic method were lower in the months of April (10.9) and May (16.9) compared to the averages observed in the selective method (56.3 and 48.4). Yet, it was necessary to carry out tactical treatments in the strategic method, after the treatment scheme, in up to 16.7% of the animals in April and up to 50.0% in May, while in the selective method, the treatments varied from 42.8 to 88.8% in April and in May it varied from 28.6 to 75.0%. The total count of R. microplus was 5,036 engorged females in the strategic method, while in the selective method there were 13,829 engorged females in the study period. Therefore, it is concluded that the treatment scheme for control of R. microplus significantly interfered in the parasitic load of dairy cows, favouring the maintenance of acceptable levels of parasitism when the strategic method of tick control was implemented compared to the adoption of the selective method. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-31T15:01:08Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-31T15:01:08Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2020-03-02 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
VIEIRA, L. S. Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros. 2020. 52 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência Animal) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2020. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/10520 |
identifier_str_mv |
VIEIRA, L. S. Comparação dos métodos de controles estratégico e seletivo na carga parasitária de Rhipicephalus microplus em rebanhos bovinos leiteiros. 2020. 52 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência Animal) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2020. |
url |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/10520 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
4581960685150189167 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
-6217552114249094582 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
453670264235017319 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência Animal (EVZ) |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFG |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia - EVZ (RG) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFG instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFG |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFG |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/d1229dc3-a375-4118-9f17-c78a947377c2/download http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/daede42b-b95c-4793-8083-5e573ad5bbae/download http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/fb78d6b6-9531-4973-904e-319c5c3fdd32/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
e39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34 bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468 dc9f91c66954a0f2fb8e1c972e9f1ce2 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.br |
_version_ |
1798044361115566080 |