PLANTS SPATIAL ARRANGEMENT FOR DIFFERENT MAIZE HYBRIDS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kappes, Claudinei
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Andrade, João Antonio da Costa, Arf, Orivaldo, Oliveira, Ângela Cristina de, Arf, Marcelo Valentini, Ferreira, João Paulo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/9650
Resumo: Changes recently introduced to maize genotypes have made necessary to reassess the management practices recommendations for this culture, among them the plants spatial arrangement. This study was carried out to evaluate the best plant arrangement design for the maize hybrids XB 6010, XB 6012, XB 7253, XB 9003, and AG 9010, spaced at 0.45 m and 0.90 m among rows. The experiment was conducted on the 2009 harvest time, in Selvíria, Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil, with spacing arranged in strips and the combinations hybrids x populations arranged in a 5x5 factorial scheme for each block. The 50,000 plants ha-1; 60,000 plants ha-1; 70,000 plants ha-1; 80,000 plants ha-1; and 90,000 plants ha-1 populations were evaluated. The results were analyzed by using the F test, with the hybrids effects and row spacing compared by the Tukey test and populations compared by regression analysis. The hybrids differed in all features measured, what can be explained by intrinsic characteristics of each genotype. The increase of the population affected negatively most of the characters and yield components. Grain yield was influenced by the spatial arrangements, with different responses from hybrids. The best arrangements were AG 9010 (90,000 plants ha-1), for the 0.45 m row spacing; XB 7253 (70,000 plants ha-1), for both row spacings; and XB 6010, XB 6012, and XB 9003, with no significant response to such arrangements, being recommended the 50,000 plants ha-1 one, for both row spacings.
id UFG-6_b28768e76af67fcfb7d4b1387b8ad954
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/9650
network_acronym_str UFG-6
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling PLANTS SPATIAL ARRANGEMENT FOR DIFFERENT MAIZE HYBRIDSARRANJO DE PLANTAS PARA DIFERENTES HÍBRIDOS DE MILHOZea mayspopulation densityplant arrangementgrain yield.Zea maysdensidade populacionalarranjo de plantasrendimento de grãos.Changes recently introduced to maize genotypes have made necessary to reassess the management practices recommendations for this culture, among them the plants spatial arrangement. This study was carried out to evaluate the best plant arrangement design for the maize hybrids XB 6010, XB 6012, XB 7253, XB 9003, and AG 9010, spaced at 0.45 m and 0.90 m among rows. The experiment was conducted on the 2009 harvest time, in Selvíria, Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil, with spacing arranged in strips and the combinations hybrids x populations arranged in a 5x5 factorial scheme for each block. The 50,000 plants ha-1; 60,000 plants ha-1; 70,000 plants ha-1; 80,000 plants ha-1; and 90,000 plants ha-1 populations were evaluated. The results were analyzed by using the F test, with the hybrids effects and row spacing compared by the Tukey test and populations compared by regression analysis. The hybrids differed in all features measured, what can be explained by intrinsic characteristics of each genotype. The increase of the population affected negatively most of the characters and yield components. Grain yield was influenced by the spatial arrangements, with different responses from hybrids. The best arrangements were AG 9010 (90,000 plants ha-1), for the 0.45 m row spacing; XB 7253 (70,000 plants ha-1), for both row spacings; and XB 6010, XB 6012, and XB 9003, with no significant response to such arrangements, being recommended the 50,000 plants ha-1 one, for both row spacings.Modificações introduzidas recentemente em genótipos de milho têm tornado necessário reavaliar as recomendações de práticas de manejo para esta cultura, dentre elas o arranjo espacial de plantas. Este trabalho foi realizado com o objetivo de verificar o melhor arranjo de plantas para os híbridos de milho XB 6010, XB 6012, XB 7253, XB 9003 e AG 9010, nos espaçamentos de 0,45 m e 0,90 m entre linhas. O experimento foi conduzido na safra 2009, em Selvíria (MS), com os espaçamentos dispostos em faixas e as combinações híbridos x populações em esquema fatorial 5x5, dentro de cada bloco. Foram avaliadas as populações de 50.000 plantas ha-1, 60.000 plantas ha-1, 70.000 plantas ha-1, 80.000 plantas ha-1 e 90.000 plantas ha-1. Os resultados foram submetidos ao teste F, sendo os efeitos de híbridos e de espaçamentos comparados pelo teste Tukey e os de populações pela análise de regressão. Os híbridos se diferenciaram em todos os caracteres mensurados, atribuindo-se este fato às características intrínsecas de cada genótipo. O incremento da população influenciou negativamente a maioria dos caracteres e componentes de produção. O rendimento de grãos foi influenciado pelos arranjos espaciais, ocorrendo respostas diferenciadas dos híbridos. Os melhores arranjos foram AG 9010 (90.000 plantas ha-1), no espaçamento 0,45 m; XB 7253 (70.000 plantas ha-1), nos dois espaçamentos; e XB 6010, XB 6012 e XB 9003, sem resposta significativa aos arranjos, podendo ser recomendado o de 50.000 plantas ha-1, nos dois espaçamentos.Escola de Agronomia - Universidade Federal de Goiás2011-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/9650Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical [Agricultural Research in the Tropics]; v. 41, n. 3, Jul./Sep. 2011; 348-359Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Agricultural Research in the Tropics); v. 41, n. 3, jul./set. 2011; 348-359Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical; v. 41, n. 3, jul./set. 2011; 348-3591983-4063reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/9650/9487Copyright (c) 2020 Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Agricultural Research in the Tropics)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKappes, ClaudineiAndrade, João Antonio da CostaArf, OrivaldoOliveira, Ângela Cristina deArf, Marcelo ValentiniFerreira, João Paulo2020-07-09T19:12:37Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/9650Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/patPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/pat/oaiaseleguini.pat@gmail.com||mgoes@agro.ufg.br1983-40631517-6398opendoar:2024-05-21T19:55:48.857509Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv PLANTS SPATIAL ARRANGEMENT FOR DIFFERENT MAIZE HYBRIDS
ARRANJO DE PLANTAS PARA DIFERENTES HÍBRIDOS DE MILHO
title PLANTS SPATIAL ARRANGEMENT FOR DIFFERENT MAIZE HYBRIDS
spellingShingle PLANTS SPATIAL ARRANGEMENT FOR DIFFERENT MAIZE HYBRIDS
Kappes, Claudinei
Zea mays
population density
plant arrangement
grain yield.
Zea mays
densidade populacional
arranjo de plantas
rendimento de grãos.
title_short PLANTS SPATIAL ARRANGEMENT FOR DIFFERENT MAIZE HYBRIDS
title_full PLANTS SPATIAL ARRANGEMENT FOR DIFFERENT MAIZE HYBRIDS
title_fullStr PLANTS SPATIAL ARRANGEMENT FOR DIFFERENT MAIZE HYBRIDS
title_full_unstemmed PLANTS SPATIAL ARRANGEMENT FOR DIFFERENT MAIZE HYBRIDS
title_sort PLANTS SPATIAL ARRANGEMENT FOR DIFFERENT MAIZE HYBRIDS
author Kappes, Claudinei
author_facet Kappes, Claudinei
Andrade, João Antonio da Costa
Arf, Orivaldo
Oliveira, Ângela Cristina de
Arf, Marcelo Valentini
Ferreira, João Paulo
author_role author
author2 Andrade, João Antonio da Costa
Arf, Orivaldo
Oliveira, Ângela Cristina de
Arf, Marcelo Valentini
Ferreira, João Paulo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kappes, Claudinei
Andrade, João Antonio da Costa
Arf, Orivaldo
Oliveira, Ângela Cristina de
Arf, Marcelo Valentini
Ferreira, João Paulo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Zea mays
population density
plant arrangement
grain yield.
Zea mays
densidade populacional
arranjo de plantas
rendimento de grãos.
topic Zea mays
population density
plant arrangement
grain yield.
Zea mays
densidade populacional
arranjo de plantas
rendimento de grãos.
description Changes recently introduced to maize genotypes have made necessary to reassess the management practices recommendations for this culture, among them the plants spatial arrangement. This study was carried out to evaluate the best plant arrangement design for the maize hybrids XB 6010, XB 6012, XB 7253, XB 9003, and AG 9010, spaced at 0.45 m and 0.90 m among rows. The experiment was conducted on the 2009 harvest time, in Selvíria, Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil, with spacing arranged in strips and the combinations hybrids x populations arranged in a 5x5 factorial scheme for each block. The 50,000 plants ha-1; 60,000 plants ha-1; 70,000 plants ha-1; 80,000 plants ha-1; and 90,000 plants ha-1 populations were evaluated. The results were analyzed by using the F test, with the hybrids effects and row spacing compared by the Tukey test and populations compared by regression analysis. The hybrids differed in all features measured, what can be explained by intrinsic characteristics of each genotype. The increase of the population affected negatively most of the characters and yield components. Grain yield was influenced by the spatial arrangements, with different responses from hybrids. The best arrangements were AG 9010 (90,000 plants ha-1), for the 0.45 m row spacing; XB 7253 (70,000 plants ha-1), for both row spacings; and XB 6010, XB 6012, and XB 9003, with no significant response to such arrangements, being recommended the 50,000 plants ha-1 one, for both row spacings.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/9650
url https://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/9650
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/9650/9487
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Agricultural Research in the Tropics)
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Agricultural Research in the Tropics)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Agronomia - Universidade Federal de Goiás
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Agronomia - Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical [Agricultural Research in the Tropics]; v. 41, n. 3, Jul./Sep. 2011; 348-359
Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Agricultural Research in the Tropics); v. 41, n. 3, jul./set. 2011; 348-359
Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical; v. 41, n. 3, jul./set. 2011; 348-359
1983-4063
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv aseleguini.pat@gmail.com||mgoes@agro.ufg.br
_version_ 1799874817603665920