As identidades de gênero e sexualidade na visão dos parlamentares da Câmara Federal: uma análise do discurso a partir dos projetos "escola sem partido"

• Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Isabella Bruna lemes
• Data de Publicação: 2017
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFG
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/8065
• topic: Análise do discurso; Direitos humanos em perspectiva decolonial; Escola sem partido; Câmara dos deputados; Ideologia de gênero; Discourse analysis; Decolonial perspective of human rights; School without party; House of representatives; Gender ideology; CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA

The aim of the dissertation is analyzing parliamentarian discourses about the human rights of people whom the sexuality, or the gender identity does not satisfy the heteronormative and heterosexual standard imposed by society. The methodology used is the analyze of the discourses using studies developed by Michel Foucault e Dominique Maingueneau. The analysis’ constitutive matter, the corpora, were the written or verbal federal congressmen’ discourses related to the House of Representatives’ parliamentarian bills with related themes to the School Without Party Movement. They are: Bill 7180/2014 (aims the insertion of the familiar value reasons precedence above the scholar education on the aspects related to the moral, sexual and religious education as a principle). Bill 7181/2014 (aims the application of a ten-year validity to the National Curricular Parameters (NCP)). Bill 867/2015 (aims the insertion of the “School Without Party Program” in the NCP). Bill 6005/2016 (aims the creation of the “Free School Program”). Bill 1859/2015 (aims the prohibition of “gender ideology” teaching policies development). Bill 5487/2016 (aims the prohibition of sexual orientation and the distribution of books about sexual diversity orientation for children). The understanding of the parliamentarian about Human Rights is relative, since it does not involve all the people, i.e., it is restricted to certain social categories, which is explained by the way the Brazilian citizenship was formed: patriarchal, full of conservatism and religious ideals that prevent a less prejudiced, sexist and colonized look about the differences and the multiple sexual identities, and allow the imposition of unfounded speeches, e.g., the “gender ideology”, restricting spaces that should be democratic.