Avaliação de diferentes substratos no tratamento de esgoto sanitário por zona de raízes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pitaluga, Douglas Pereira da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2011
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFG
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/5099
Resumo: The present study had the goal of assessing the efficiency and behavior of three substrates in the treatment of sanitary sewage in a root zone system. Specifically the objectives were to assess the behavior of the washed sand, gravel # 0 and gravel # 1 substrates and relate their efficacies in a root zone system with sub-superficial horizontal flow preceded by a septic tank and an anaerobic filter in the treatment of a sewage coming from one university unit. The repetitions of raw sewage constituted of five simple samples and five composed samples. The repetitions of the effluent of each stage of the treatment constituted of nineteen simple samples. All the samples were performed fortnightly and submitted to laboratorial analysis. Were assessed parameters the BOD, DO, COD, thermotolerant coliforms, pH, total phosphorus, Kjeldahl total nitrogen, ammoniacal nitrogen, oil and grease, total solids, total fixed solids and suspended solids. The experimental system of sewage treatment was set up at the Civil Engineering College, located at Campus I of the Federal University of Goiás, in the east region of the city of Goiânia – Goiás, Brazil, which constituted of a septic tank and an anaerobic filter, followed by three independent units of root zones. Each unit of the root zones received the flow of 180 L d-1, which corresponds to the area of a treatment station of 3 m2 per inhabitant. The treatment in these units occurred simultaneously. After thirty days from the beginning of the sewage application in the root zones, the collection of the samples to the analysis of the effluent and affluent quality were started. Considering the plant evapotranspiration, the results were analyzed by the tool Statistical Analysis System – SAS, performing F tests and Tukey – Kramer test with a 5% probability. The percentage efficacies of the three substrates used were similar. There hasn’t been any significant difference between the efficacies of the treatments in the removal of the attributes: COD, Kjeldahl total nitrogen, ammoniacal nitrogen, oil and grease. The treatment with washed sand substrate was more efficient in the removal of BOD and total phosphorous. The gravel # 0 was more efficient in the removal of thermotolerant coliforms, total solids and fixed total solids, and gravel # 1 was more efficient in the removal of suspended solids. After 18 months the system started working, the channel filled with washed sand colmatated.
id UFG-2_f0d6efb7ff2d18d5b94eb7f6e2717fbc
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/5099
network_acronym_str UFG-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFG
repository_id_str
spelling Almeida, Rogério de Araújohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7455447665040845Almeida, Rogério de AraújoCarvalho, Eraldo Henriques deSandri, Delviohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0153853309069404Pitaluga, Douglas Pereira da Silva2016-01-14T13:05:22Z2011-06-28PITALUGA, Douglas Pereira da Silva. Avaliação de diferentes substratos no tratamento de esgoto sanitário por zona de raízes. 2011. 133 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia do Meio Ambiente) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2011.http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/5099The present study had the goal of assessing the efficiency and behavior of three substrates in the treatment of sanitary sewage in a root zone system. Specifically the objectives were to assess the behavior of the washed sand, gravel # 0 and gravel # 1 substrates and relate their efficacies in a root zone system with sub-superficial horizontal flow preceded by a septic tank and an anaerobic filter in the treatment of a sewage coming from one university unit. The repetitions of raw sewage constituted of five simple samples and five composed samples. The repetitions of the effluent of each stage of the treatment constituted of nineteen simple samples. All the samples were performed fortnightly and submitted to laboratorial analysis. Were assessed parameters the BOD, DO, COD, thermotolerant coliforms, pH, total phosphorus, Kjeldahl total nitrogen, ammoniacal nitrogen, oil and grease, total solids, total fixed solids and suspended solids. The experimental system of sewage treatment was set up at the Civil Engineering College, located at Campus I of the Federal University of Goiás, in the east region of the city of Goiânia – Goiás, Brazil, which constituted of a septic tank and an anaerobic filter, followed by three independent units of root zones. Each unit of the root zones received the flow of 180 L d-1, which corresponds to the area of a treatment station of 3 m2 per inhabitant. The treatment in these units occurred simultaneously. After thirty days from the beginning of the sewage application in the root zones, the collection of the samples to the analysis of the effluent and affluent quality were started. Considering the plant evapotranspiration, the results were analyzed by the tool Statistical Analysis System – SAS, performing F tests and Tukey – Kramer test with a 5% probability. The percentage efficacies of the three substrates used were similar. There hasn’t been any significant difference between the efficacies of the treatments in the removal of the attributes: COD, Kjeldahl total nitrogen, ammoniacal nitrogen, oil and grease. The treatment with washed sand substrate was more efficient in the removal of BOD and total phosphorous. The gravel # 0 was more efficient in the removal of thermotolerant coliforms, total solids and fixed total solids, and gravel # 1 was more efficient in the removal of suspended solids. After 18 months the system started working, the channel filled with washed sand colmatated.O presente estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a eficiência e o comportamento de três substratos no tratamento de esgoto sanitário, num sistema do tipo zona de raízes. De modo específico, objetivou-se avaliar o comportamento dos substratos areia lavada, brita # 0 e brita # 1 e relacionar suas eficiências num sistema do tipo zona de raízes de fluxo subsuperficial horizontal, precedido de tanque séptico e filtro anaeróbio, no tratamento do esgoto gerado numa unidade universitária. As repetições do esgoto bruto foram constituídas por cinco amostragens compostas e cinco amostragens simples. Já as repetições do efluente de cada etapa do tratamento foram constituídas por dezenove amostragens simples. Todas as amostragens foram realizadas quinzenalmente e submetidas a análises laboratoriais. Foram avaliados os parâmetros de DBO, OD, DQO, coliformes termotolerantes, pH, óleos e graxas, fósforo total, nitrogênio total Kjeldahl, nitrogênio amoniacal, sólidos totais, sólidos totais fixos e sólidos suspensos. O sistema experimental de tratamento de esgotos foi implantado na Escola de Engenharias, localizada no Campus I da Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), região Leste da cidade de Goiânia-GO e constituiu-se de um tanque séptico e um filtro anaeróbio, seguidos por três unidades de zona de raízes independentes. Cada unidade de zona de raízes recebeu uma vazão de 180 L d-1, correspondente a uma área de sistema zona de raízes de 3 m2 por habitante. O tratamento nestas unidades ocorreu de forma simultânea. Após trinta dias do início da aplicação de esgoto nas zonas de raízes, iniciaram-se as amostragens para a análise da qualidade do afluente e dos efluentes. Considerando a evapotranspiração das plantas, os resultados foram analisados pela ferramenta Statistical Analysis System – SAS, realizando os Testes F e de Tukey – Kramer, a 5% de probabilidade. As eficiências percentuais dos três substratos utilizados foram semelhantes. Não houve diferença significativa entre as eficiências dos tratamentos na remoção dos atributos: DQO, nitrogênio total Kjeldahl, nitrogênio amoniacal e óleos e graxas. O tratamento com substrato areia lavada foi mais eficiente na remoção de: DBO e fósforo total; o substrato brita # 0 foi mais eficiente na remoção de coliformes termotolerantes, sólidos totais e sólidos totais fixos, e a brita # 1 foi mais eficiente na redução dos sólidos suspensos. Após 18 meses do início de funcionamento do sistema o leito preenchido com areia lavada colmatou.Submitted by Erika Demachki (erikademachki@gmail.com) on 2016-01-14T12:59:48Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Douglas Pereira da Silva Pitaluga - 2014.pdf: 5824789 bytes, checksum: 85a87385cf42dae67ee7e83bc0803d6e (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Erika Demachki (erikademachki@gmail.com) on 2016-01-14T13:05:22Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Douglas Pereira da Silva Pitaluga - 2014.pdf: 5824789 bytes, checksum: 85a87385cf42dae67ee7e83bc0803d6e (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2016-01-14T13:05:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Douglas Pereira da Silva Pitaluga - 2014.pdf: 5824789 bytes, checksum: 85a87385cf42dae67ee7e83bc0803d6e (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-06-28application/pdfhttp://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/retrieve/25065/Disserta%c3%a7%c3%a3o%20-%20Douglas%20Pereira%20da%20Silva%20Pitaluga%20-%202014.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Federal de GoiásPrograma de Pós-graduação em Engenharia do Meio Ambiente (EEC)UFGBrasilEscola de Engenharia Civil - EEC (RG)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFitorremediaçãoAlagados construídosWetlandsFitoremediationConstructed wetlandsENGENHARIASAvaliação de diferentes substratos no tratamento de esgoto sanitário por zona de raízesEvaluation of different substrates in the treatment of sanitary sewage by root zoneinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis10097020919728748476006006007240872516263155854518971056484826825reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFGinstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/5bb6f543-6e82-4ab9-bd8a-4198ffbc80fb/downloadbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51CC-LICENSElicense_urllicense_urltext/plain; charset=utf-849http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/3315dda0-8a9b-49a6-89c9-897f51cb3032/download4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2fMD52license_textlicense_texttext/html; charset=utf-822064http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/e70271c8-3b2a-4e85-9d77-b0d137679e26/downloadef48816a10f2d45f2e2fee2f478e2fafMD53license_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-823148http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/b0c98fb8-3fe4-47e9-94a9-b938a156cd9b/download9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306MD54ORIGINALDissertação - Douglas Pereira da Silva Pitaluga - 2014.pdfDissertação - Douglas Pereira da Silva Pitaluga - 2014.pdfapplication/pdf5824789http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/bdce094d-b8aa-4c98-bb28-7a4b930cd6d2/download85a87385cf42dae67ee7e83bc0803d6eMD55TEXTDissertação - Douglas Pereira da Silva Pitaluga - 2014.pdf.txtDissertação - Douglas Pereira da Silva Pitaluga - 2014.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain275882http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/95dade9b-5cd2-4929-b66f-cae4e93b9bab/download8e3d8ae8f37b0039df564311d4044c8dMD56THUMBNAILDissertação - Douglas Pereira da Silva Pitaluga - 2014.pdf.jpgDissertação - Douglas Pereira da Silva Pitaluga - 2014.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1943http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/ad3a82e2-bb3a-46b8-828f-3146458ec1d6/downloadcc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2MD57tede/50992016-01-15 03:02:48.167http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Acesso Abertoopen.accessoai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/5099http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tedeRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/oai/requesttasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.bropendoar:2016-01-15T05:02:48Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)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
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Avaliação de diferentes substratos no tratamento de esgoto sanitário por zona de raízes
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Evaluation of different substrates in the treatment of sanitary sewage by root zone
title Avaliação de diferentes substratos no tratamento de esgoto sanitário por zona de raízes
spellingShingle Avaliação de diferentes substratos no tratamento de esgoto sanitário por zona de raízes
Pitaluga, Douglas Pereira da Silva
Fitorremediação
Alagados construídos
Wetlands
Fitoremediation
Constructed wetlands
ENGENHARIAS
title_short Avaliação de diferentes substratos no tratamento de esgoto sanitário por zona de raízes
title_full Avaliação de diferentes substratos no tratamento de esgoto sanitário por zona de raízes
title_fullStr Avaliação de diferentes substratos no tratamento de esgoto sanitário por zona de raízes
title_full_unstemmed Avaliação de diferentes substratos no tratamento de esgoto sanitário por zona de raízes
title_sort Avaliação de diferentes substratos no tratamento de esgoto sanitário por zona de raízes
author Pitaluga, Douglas Pereira da Silva
author_facet Pitaluga, Douglas Pereira da Silva
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Almeida, Rogério de Araújo
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/7455447665040845
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Almeida, Rogério de Araújo
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Carvalho, Eraldo Henriques de
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Sandri, Delvio
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0153853309069404
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pitaluga, Douglas Pereira da Silva
contributor_str_mv Almeida, Rogério de Araújo
Almeida, Rogério de Araújo
Carvalho, Eraldo Henriques de
Sandri, Delvio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fitorremediação
Alagados construídos
topic Fitorremediação
Alagados construídos
Wetlands
Fitoremediation
Constructed wetlands
ENGENHARIAS
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Wetlands
Fitoremediation
Constructed wetlands
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv ENGENHARIAS
description The present study had the goal of assessing the efficiency and behavior of three substrates in the treatment of sanitary sewage in a root zone system. Specifically the objectives were to assess the behavior of the washed sand, gravel # 0 and gravel # 1 substrates and relate their efficacies in a root zone system with sub-superficial horizontal flow preceded by a septic tank and an anaerobic filter in the treatment of a sewage coming from one university unit. The repetitions of raw sewage constituted of five simple samples and five composed samples. The repetitions of the effluent of each stage of the treatment constituted of nineteen simple samples. All the samples were performed fortnightly and submitted to laboratorial analysis. Were assessed parameters the BOD, DO, COD, thermotolerant coliforms, pH, total phosphorus, Kjeldahl total nitrogen, ammoniacal nitrogen, oil and grease, total solids, total fixed solids and suspended solids. The experimental system of sewage treatment was set up at the Civil Engineering College, located at Campus I of the Federal University of Goiás, in the east region of the city of Goiânia – Goiás, Brazil, which constituted of a septic tank and an anaerobic filter, followed by three independent units of root zones. Each unit of the root zones received the flow of 180 L d-1, which corresponds to the area of a treatment station of 3 m2 per inhabitant. The treatment in these units occurred simultaneously. After thirty days from the beginning of the sewage application in the root zones, the collection of the samples to the analysis of the effluent and affluent quality were started. Considering the plant evapotranspiration, the results were analyzed by the tool Statistical Analysis System – SAS, performing F tests and Tukey – Kramer test with a 5% probability. The percentage efficacies of the three substrates used were similar. There hasn’t been any significant difference between the efficacies of the treatments in the removal of the attributes: COD, Kjeldahl total nitrogen, ammoniacal nitrogen, oil and grease. The treatment with washed sand substrate was more efficient in the removal of BOD and total phosphorous. The gravel # 0 was more efficient in the removal of thermotolerant coliforms, total solids and fixed total solids, and gravel # 1 was more efficient in the removal of suspended solids. After 18 months the system started working, the channel filled with washed sand colmatated.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2011-06-28
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-01-14T13:05:22Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv PITALUGA, Douglas Pereira da Silva. Avaliação de diferentes substratos no tratamento de esgoto sanitário por zona de raízes. 2011. 133 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia do Meio Ambiente) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2011.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/5099
identifier_str_mv PITALUGA, Douglas Pereira da Silva. Avaliação de diferentes substratos no tratamento de esgoto sanitário por zona de raízes. 2011. 133 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia do Meio Ambiente) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2011.
url http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/5099
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv 1009702091972874847
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv 724087251626315585
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 4518971056484826825
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-graduação em Engenharia do Meio Ambiente (EEC)
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFG
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Escola de Engenharia Civil - EEC (RG)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFG
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFG
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/5bb6f543-6e82-4ab9-bd8a-4198ffbc80fb/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/3315dda0-8a9b-49a6-89c9-897f51cb3032/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/e70271c8-3b2a-4e85-9d77-b0d137679e26/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/b0c98fb8-3fe4-47e9-94a9-b938a156cd9b/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/bdce094d-b8aa-4c98-bb28-7a4b930cd6d2/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/95dade9b-5cd2-4929-b66f-cae4e93b9bab/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/ad3a82e2-bb3a-46b8-828f-3146458ec1d6/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2f
ef48816a10f2d45f2e2fee2f478e2faf
9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306
85a87385cf42dae67ee7e83bc0803d6e
8e3d8ae8f37b0039df564311d4044c8d
cc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.br
_version_ 1793965540283252736