The introduction of the moral psychology in the ergon argument

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pires de Oliveira, Angelo Antonio
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Rónai
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/ronai/article/view/32068
Resumo: In this paper, I discuss in detail one of the first conclusions drawn by Aristotle in the ergon argument. The paper provides an in-depth approach to Nicomachean Ethics’ lines 1098a3-4, where one reads: “λείπεται δὴ πρακτική τις τοῦ λόγον ἔχοντος”. I divide the discussion into two parts. In the first part, I put under scrutiny how one should take the word “πρακτική” and argue that one should avoid taking this word as meaning “practical” in the passage. I will argue in favor of taking it as meaning “active”. The exegetical inconvenience of taking “πρακτική” as meaning “practical” is the fact that it restricts the results achieved in the ergon argument by excluding the possibility of contemplation being considered a eudaimon life. In the second part, I discuss the expression “λόγον ἔχον” and provide some arguments to take it as preliminarily introducing the criterion of division of the virtues that will be spelled out in EN I.13 so that the λόγον-ἔχον part of the soul here also makes reference to the virtue of the non-rational part, i.e., virtue of character. I offer a deflationary view by showing that the moral psychology is developed in EN I.7 within the limits imposed by the ergon argument.
id UFJF-3_0cf1da28a769d74d2e514282a3594eeb
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufjf.br:article/32068
network_acronym_str UFJF-3
network_name_str Rónai
repository_id_str
spelling The introduction of the moral psychology in the ergon argumentA introdução da psicologia moral no argumento do ergonA introdução da psicologia moral no argumento do ergonergon argumentmoral psychologyvirtuesAristotleNichomaean Ethicsargumento do Ergonpsicologia moralvirtudesAristótelesÉtica a NicômacoIn this paper, I discuss in detail one of the first conclusions drawn by Aristotle in the ergon argument. The paper provides an in-depth approach to Nicomachean Ethics’ lines 1098a3-4, where one reads: “λείπεται δὴ πρακτική τις τοῦ λόγον ἔχοντος”. I divide the discussion into two parts. In the first part, I put under scrutiny how one should take the word “πρακτική” and argue that one should avoid taking this word as meaning “practical” in the passage. I will argue in favor of taking it as meaning “active”. The exegetical inconvenience of taking “πρακτική” as meaning “practical” is the fact that it restricts the results achieved in the ergon argument by excluding the possibility of contemplation being considered a eudaimon life. In the second part, I discuss the expression “λόγον ἔχον” and provide some arguments to take it as preliminarily introducing the criterion of division of the virtues that will be spelled out in EN I.13 so that the λόγον-ἔχον part of the soul here also makes reference to the virtue of the non-rational part, i.e., virtue of character. I offer a deflationary view by showing that the moral psychology is developed in EN I.7 within the limits imposed by the ergon argument.Neste artigo, eu discuto em detalhes uma das primeiras conclusões apresentadas por Aristóteles no argumento do ergon. O artigo traz uma discussão pormenorizada da afirmação “λείπεται δὴ πρακτική τις τοῦ λόγον ἔχοντος” nas linhas 1098a3-4 da Ética a Nicômaco. Eu divido a discussão em duas partes. Na primeira parte, eu coloco em discussão como se deve entender a palavra “πρακτική” e argumento que se deve evitar tomá-la como significando “prática”. Eu argumentarei em favor de entendê-la como significando “ativa”. O  inconveniente exegético de tomar “πρακτική” com o significado de “prática” é que tal leitura restringe os resultados alcançados no argumento do ergon ao excluir a possibilidade de a vida contemplativa ser considerada uma vida eudaimon. Na segunda parte, eu discuto a expressão “λόγον ἔχον” e forneço alguns argumentos para entender a expressão como preliminarmente introduzindo o critério de divisão de virtudes que será apresentado em EN I.13 de modo que a expressão “λόγον ἔχον” na passagem discutida deve ser entendida como também fazendo referência à virtude da parte não-racional da alma, a saber, à virtude do caráter. Eu apresento uma interpretação deflacionária, argumentando que a psicologia moral é desenvolvida em EN I.7 tendo em vista os interesses argumentativos do argumento do ergon.Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora2020-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/ronai/article/view/3206810.34019/2318-3446.2020.v8.32068Rónai – Revista de Estudos Clássicos e Tradutórios; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020); 375-391Rónai – Revista de Estudos Clássicos e Tradutórios; v. 8 n. 2 (2020); 375-3912318-3446reponame:Rónaiinstname:Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)instacron:UFJFporhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/ronai/article/view/32068/21801Copyright (c) 2020 Angelo Antonio Pires de Oliveirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPires de Oliveira, Angelo Antonio2023-10-27T19:04:24Zoai:periodicos.ufjf.br:article/32068Revistahttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/ronaiPUBhttps://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/ronai/oairevistaronai@gmail.comhttps://doi.org/10.34019/2318-34462318-34462318-3446opendoar:2024-05-03T12:01:06.347394Rónai - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The introduction of the moral psychology in the ergon argument
A introdução da psicologia moral no argumento do ergon
A introdução da psicologia moral no argumento do ergon
title The introduction of the moral psychology in the ergon argument
spellingShingle The introduction of the moral psychology in the ergon argument
Pires de Oliveira, Angelo Antonio
ergon argument
moral psychology
virtues
Aristotle
Nichomaean Ethics
argumento do Ergon
psicologia moral
virtudes
Aristóteles
Ética a Nicômaco
title_short The introduction of the moral psychology in the ergon argument
title_full The introduction of the moral psychology in the ergon argument
title_fullStr The introduction of the moral psychology in the ergon argument
title_full_unstemmed The introduction of the moral psychology in the ergon argument
title_sort The introduction of the moral psychology in the ergon argument
author Pires de Oliveira, Angelo Antonio
author_facet Pires de Oliveira, Angelo Antonio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pires de Oliveira, Angelo Antonio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ergon argument
moral psychology
virtues
Aristotle
Nichomaean Ethics
argumento do Ergon
psicologia moral
virtudes
Aristóteles
Ética a Nicômaco
topic ergon argument
moral psychology
virtues
Aristotle
Nichomaean Ethics
argumento do Ergon
psicologia moral
virtudes
Aristóteles
Ética a Nicômaco
description In this paper, I discuss in detail one of the first conclusions drawn by Aristotle in the ergon argument. The paper provides an in-depth approach to Nicomachean Ethics’ lines 1098a3-4, where one reads: “λείπεται δὴ πρακτική τις τοῦ λόγον ἔχοντος”. I divide the discussion into two parts. In the first part, I put under scrutiny how one should take the word “πρακτική” and argue that one should avoid taking this word as meaning “practical” in the passage. I will argue in favor of taking it as meaning “active”. The exegetical inconvenience of taking “πρακτική” as meaning “practical” is the fact that it restricts the results achieved in the ergon argument by excluding the possibility of contemplation being considered a eudaimon life. In the second part, I discuss the expression “λόγον ἔχον” and provide some arguments to take it as preliminarily introducing the criterion of division of the virtues that will be spelled out in EN I.13 so that the λόγον-ἔχον part of the soul here also makes reference to the virtue of the non-rational part, i.e., virtue of character. I offer a deflationary view by showing that the moral psychology is developed in EN I.7 within the limits imposed by the ergon argument.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/ronai/article/view/32068
10.34019/2318-3446.2020.v8.32068
url https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/ronai/article/view/32068
identifier_str_mv 10.34019/2318-3446.2020.v8.32068
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/ronai/article/view/32068/21801
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Angelo Antonio Pires de Oliveira
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Angelo Antonio Pires de Oliveira
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Rónai – Revista de Estudos Clássicos e Tradutórios; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020); 375-391
Rónai – Revista de Estudos Clássicos e Tradutórios; v. 8 n. 2 (2020); 375-391
2318-3446
reponame:Rónai
instname:Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
instacron:UFJF
instname_str Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
instacron_str UFJF
institution UFJF
reponame_str Rónai
collection Rónai
repository.name.fl_str_mv Rónai - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistaronai@gmail.com
_version_ 1798044934412959744