Tropical soils characterization at low cost and time using portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF): Effects of different sample preparation methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,Sérgio Henrique Godinho
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Silva,Elen Alvarenga, Poggere,Giovana Clarice, Guilherme,Luiz Roberto Guimarães, Curi,Nilton
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542018000100080
Resumo: ABSTRACT Portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF) has been recently adopted by the Soil Science community for uses in both field and laboratory, obtaining the total content of several chemical elements in a few seconds. Sulfuric acid digestion is an expensive and time-consuming laboratory analysis that provides contents of Fe2O3, Al2O3, SiO2, TiO2 and P2O5, important for soil studies. Due to few pXRF studies in tropical soils, this work aimed to compare contents of Fe2O3, Al2O3, SiO2, TiO2 and P2O5 obtained by pXRF with sulfuric acid digestion results, and to evaluate the effects of varying forms of preparing soil samples and scanning with pXRF on the resulting values in Brazilian soils. Soils were scanned in five conditions in-field (in situ) and in laboratory, evaluating varying sample preparation methods, particle sizes and soil moisture. Four pXRF scanning operational modes were tested. Linear regressions were adjusted between results of pXRF and sulfuric acid digestion. Equations were validated with an independent set of samples. Statistical analyses compared the methods of preparing the samples. Adequate linear models reached R2 of 0.99 and 0.89 for Fe2O3 and TiO2, respectively. Validation promoted R2 greater than 0.97 and RMSE and ME close to zero for both oxides. Statistical differences of pXRF results were found among the methods of preparing samples. pXRF spectrometer has great potential to obtain Fe2O3 and TiO2 content rapidly and economically with high correspondence with laboratory results of sulfuric acid digestion analysis. Varying methods of preparing the samples promote differences in the results of pXRF.
id UFLA-2_aea4a00addd8dba6c7292dbf8f338da8
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-70542018000100080
network_acronym_str UFLA-2
network_name_str Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Tropical soils characterization at low cost and time using portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF): Effects of different sample preparation methodsSoil chemical propertiesproximal sensorsulfuric acid digestion analysissoil properties predictionoxidesABSTRACT Portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF) has been recently adopted by the Soil Science community for uses in both field and laboratory, obtaining the total content of several chemical elements in a few seconds. Sulfuric acid digestion is an expensive and time-consuming laboratory analysis that provides contents of Fe2O3, Al2O3, SiO2, TiO2 and P2O5, important for soil studies. Due to few pXRF studies in tropical soils, this work aimed to compare contents of Fe2O3, Al2O3, SiO2, TiO2 and P2O5 obtained by pXRF with sulfuric acid digestion results, and to evaluate the effects of varying forms of preparing soil samples and scanning with pXRF on the resulting values in Brazilian soils. Soils were scanned in five conditions in-field (in situ) and in laboratory, evaluating varying sample preparation methods, particle sizes and soil moisture. Four pXRF scanning operational modes were tested. Linear regressions were adjusted between results of pXRF and sulfuric acid digestion. Equations were validated with an independent set of samples. Statistical analyses compared the methods of preparing the samples. Adequate linear models reached R2 of 0.99 and 0.89 for Fe2O3 and TiO2, respectively. Validation promoted R2 greater than 0.97 and RMSE and ME close to zero for both oxides. Statistical differences of pXRF results were found among the methods of preparing samples. pXRF spectrometer has great potential to obtain Fe2O3 and TiO2 content rapidly and economically with high correspondence with laboratory results of sulfuric acid digestion analysis. Varying methods of preparing the samples promote differences in the results of pXRF.Editora da UFLA2018-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542018000100080Ciência e Agrotecnologia v.42 n.1 2018reponame:Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)instacron:UFLA10.1590/1413-70542018421009117info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Sérgio Henrique GodinhoSilva,Elen AlvarengaPoggere,Giovana ClariceGuilherme,Luiz Roberto GuimarãesCuri,Niltoneng2018-03-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-70542018000100080Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/cagroPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||renpaiva@dbi.ufla.br|| editora@editora.ufla.br1981-18291413-7054opendoar:2022-11-22T16:31:34.101738Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Tropical soils characterization at low cost and time using portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF): Effects of different sample preparation methods
title Tropical soils characterization at low cost and time using portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF): Effects of different sample preparation methods
spellingShingle Tropical soils characterization at low cost and time using portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF): Effects of different sample preparation methods
Silva,Sérgio Henrique Godinho
Soil chemical properties
proximal sensor
sulfuric acid digestion analysis
soil properties prediction
oxides
title_short Tropical soils characterization at low cost and time using portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF): Effects of different sample preparation methods
title_full Tropical soils characterization at low cost and time using portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF): Effects of different sample preparation methods
title_fullStr Tropical soils characterization at low cost and time using portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF): Effects of different sample preparation methods
title_full_unstemmed Tropical soils characterization at low cost and time using portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF): Effects of different sample preparation methods
title_sort Tropical soils characterization at low cost and time using portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF): Effects of different sample preparation methods
author Silva,Sérgio Henrique Godinho
author_facet Silva,Sérgio Henrique Godinho
Silva,Elen Alvarenga
Poggere,Giovana Clarice
Guilherme,Luiz Roberto Guimarães
Curi,Nilton
author_role author
author2 Silva,Elen Alvarenga
Poggere,Giovana Clarice
Guilherme,Luiz Roberto Guimarães
Curi,Nilton
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Sérgio Henrique Godinho
Silva,Elen Alvarenga
Poggere,Giovana Clarice
Guilherme,Luiz Roberto Guimarães
Curi,Nilton
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Soil chemical properties
proximal sensor
sulfuric acid digestion analysis
soil properties prediction
oxides
topic Soil chemical properties
proximal sensor
sulfuric acid digestion analysis
soil properties prediction
oxides
description ABSTRACT Portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF) has been recently adopted by the Soil Science community for uses in both field and laboratory, obtaining the total content of several chemical elements in a few seconds. Sulfuric acid digestion is an expensive and time-consuming laboratory analysis that provides contents of Fe2O3, Al2O3, SiO2, TiO2 and P2O5, important for soil studies. Due to few pXRF studies in tropical soils, this work aimed to compare contents of Fe2O3, Al2O3, SiO2, TiO2 and P2O5 obtained by pXRF with sulfuric acid digestion results, and to evaluate the effects of varying forms of preparing soil samples and scanning with pXRF on the resulting values in Brazilian soils. Soils were scanned in five conditions in-field (in situ) and in laboratory, evaluating varying sample preparation methods, particle sizes and soil moisture. Four pXRF scanning operational modes were tested. Linear regressions were adjusted between results of pXRF and sulfuric acid digestion. Equations were validated with an independent set of samples. Statistical analyses compared the methods of preparing the samples. Adequate linear models reached R2 of 0.99 and 0.89 for Fe2O3 and TiO2, respectively. Validation promoted R2 greater than 0.97 and RMSE and ME close to zero for both oxides. Statistical differences of pXRF results were found among the methods of preparing samples. pXRF spectrometer has great potential to obtain Fe2O3 and TiO2 content rapidly and economically with high correspondence with laboratory results of sulfuric acid digestion analysis. Varying methods of preparing the samples promote differences in the results of pXRF.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542018000100080
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542018000100080
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1413-70542018421009117
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da UFLA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da UFLA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência e Agrotecnologia v.42 n.1 2018
reponame:Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron:UFLA
instname_str Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron_str UFLA
institution UFLA
reponame_str Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
collection Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||renpaiva@dbi.ufla.br|| editora@editora.ufla.br
_version_ 1799874970713587712